Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mr.civilman | مهدی راشکی

Channel

Mr.civilman | مهدی راشکی

@Mrcivilman

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

962subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001128805072
TypeChannel
Username@Mrcivilman
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mrcivilman

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

955962958.57 August 2026 — 959 subscribers8 August 2026 — 959 subscribers16 August 2026 — 957 subscribers24 August 2026 — 959 subscribers1 September 2026 — 955 subscribers10 September 2026 — 959 subscribers18 September 2026 — 962 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 42 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 954–963 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:57962+3
10 Sept 2026, 23:36959+4
1 Sept 2026, 02:13955-4
24 Aug 2026, 16:47959+2
16 Aug 2026, 06:54957-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:48959no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:45959first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4h 33m
Average length
27m 22s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6159.2%
👍2120.4%
🤯65.83%
👏54.85%
🤩54.85%
😈21.94%
👌10.971%
🔥10.971%
🥰10.971%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC251 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🤩1

Signed mehdi rashki

6 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC118 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

سختی و مقاومت تذکر: "اولش میگم سختی نقطه مقابل تغییر شکله این از نظر علمی غلطه درستش اینه که بگیم سختی یعنی مقاومت در برابر تغییرشکل، ولی هدف درک کلی این موضوع بود دیگه" در یک دقیقه خیلی ساده و مبتدی تفاوت سختی و مقاومت رو ببینین. با تشکر از مهندس عظیمی بابت مثال ماشین های امریکایی @mrcivilman

👍3👌1

Signed mehdi rashki

6 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC352 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

شب جمعه ست و ابزارآلات عزادار @mrcivilman

🤯2🥰1

Signed mehdi rashki

3 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC482 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

چرا؟ میگن بعضی کارها فقط نما دارن... @mrcivilman

❤2👍2

Signed mehdi rashki

1 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC247 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @engazimi60

1️⃣6️⃣2️⃣4️⃣ ‎❇️سختي در فيزيك خونديم كه سختي نيرو رو به سمت خودش جذب ميكنه دوستان آمريكايي ها در زمان قديم ماشين هايي مثل شورلت،بيوك،دوج و ... رو ميساختن و اين ماشين ها سختي زياد داشتن. يعني ماشين هاي محكمي بودند. شاسي قوي داشتن. اگر با جايي مثلا يك ديوار برخورد ميكردن صدمه كمي ميديدن. اون زمان طرز فكر ماشين سازها اين بود كه ماشين بايد مستحكم باشه تا صدمه نبينه. اما رفته رفته ديدن در تصادفات ماشين هاي آمريكايي زياد…

❤4👍3🤯2🤩1

Signed mehdi rashki

1 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈1,260 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

این ویدیو رو دیدم خیلی جالب بود موضوعش در رابطه با پیش نویس ۲۸۰۰ ویرایش ۵ هست ولی در کل خیلی ارزشمنده ارائه مهندس جواد قدرتی هست. اصلا عجیب و باحال بود یک متن خوبی مهندس عظیمی در رابطه با سختی و مقاومت گفته بودن(که بعد این پست میذارمش) اینجا یکم بحث سختی و شکل پذیری و مقاومت و...گفته شد دیدم بحث خیلی جالب و جذابه واستون ارسال کردم خلاصه ش اینه که تفکر بر این بود که شکل پذیری خیلی خوبه ولی تو ساختمان مستقیم با دریفت…

❤6🤯1

Signed mehdi rashki

1 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC519 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

یک نکته جالب از ۲۸۰۰ ویرایش ۵ بگم میای سازه رو برای زلزله بیشینه طراحی میکنی که ۱.۵ برابر زلزله طرح هست. اون وقت فونداسیون رو برای زلزله طرح میای طراحی میکنی؟ اصلا نمیفهممش! جُک نیست ها ...واقعا فونداسیون از اسکلت ضعیف تر طراحی میشه! باشد که رستگار شوید. @mrcivilman

❤1😈1

Signed mehdi rashki

1 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC209 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤2🔥1

Signed mehdi rashki

1 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC205 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

سوال از استاندارد ۲۸۰۰ پاسخ: گزینه ۴

❤3

Signed mehdi rashki

1 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC195 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

نکته از استاندارد ۲۸۰۰ @mrcivilman

❤3

Signed mehdi rashki

30 Jul 2026, 18:36 UTC202 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AlirezaeiChannelPhoto

🔵 فلوچارت تعیین ضریب زلزله براساس ویرایش پنجم 2800 🟡 در روش تحلیل استاتیکی معادل، نیروهای جانبی ناشی از زلزله، مطابق ضوابط بند 3-9-1 تعیین و به صورت استاتیکی در امتدادها و جهات مختلف به سازه اعمال می‌گردند و سازه با فرض رفتار خطی تحلیل می‌شود. همچنین لازم است ضوابط بند 3-6-2 در خصوص اثر همزمان نیروهای زلزله در دو امتداد افقی متعامد نیز در نظر گرفته شود. 🟡 در ویرایش پنجم، حداقل ضریب زلزله براساس دو رابطه داده شده اس…

❤4👍1

Signed mehdi rashki

27 Jul 2026, 16:40 UTC253 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

وقتی عرض تیر بزرگتر از ستونه تهیه توسط مهندس مهدی راشکی

❤3👍1

Signed mehdi rashki

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Mrcivilman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

آموزش نقشه برداری مهندس نباتی
@nabati_eng · 24,118
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 September 2026
دپارتمان آموزشی پاراسیویل| ♾عمران و معماری
@paracivil1 · 22,783
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
آکادمی عمران
@academy_of_civil · 36,693
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mr.civilman | مهدی راشکی” (@Mrcivilman), 962 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mrcivilman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.