Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mertz | Закрыто

Channel

Mertz | Закрыто

@MreRtz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

140subscribers

-61 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002594269317
TypeChannel
Username@MreRtz
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MreRtz

Growth

140203171.57 August 2026 — 201 subscribers8 August 2026 — 202 subscribers8 August 2026 — 202 subscribers15 August 2026 — 203 subscribers23 August 2026 — 193 subscribers31 August 2026 — 145 subscribers9 September 2026 — 140 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 33 days, net -61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 131–212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 09:56140-5
31 Aug 2026, 07:57145-48
23 Aug 2026, 09:57193-10
15 Aug 2026, 02:14203+1
8 Aug 2026, 11:30202no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:51202+1
7 Aug 2026, 16:16201first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

879 reactions across 15 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 519065051762108250711513.1%
custom 544279915698694260811112.6%
custom 5269233214953650988859.67%
custom 5429385338466366872758.53%
custom 5271751831020665360637.17%
custom 5312223548369046728576.48%
custom 5440653923901797137556.26%
custom 5321433001928722003384.32%
custom 5255701082968957046212.39%
custom 5278430861648209126171.93%
custom 5384396732861806572171.93%
custom 5395672117230470584171.93%
custom 5397995037407606594171.93%
custom 5228913152900490112151.71%
custom 5444979080522907486151.71%
custom 5384566998250321859121.37%
custom 5444925470741121835121.37%
custom 5445164305282515386121.37%
custom 5384576653336803972111.25%
custom 5337011655765171266101.14%
19 further kinds10411.8%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 879 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
200
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 20 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MreRtz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 December 2025 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC23 viewsread 8 August 2026

New post Рп, рк, мнение по желанию и под разделитель. Сделали репост — канал сюда.

8 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC67 views28 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🕸️ Я щедра на траты, хороша в Louis Vuitton Почти так же элегантна, как моё авто

custom 53370116557651712667custom 54451643052825153867custom 53394190794238592816custom 53390880104597818174custom 53390193124578824571custom 53392296069415964471custom 53395273598443573231custom 54430629366983728211

8 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC68 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Не оставлю конкурентам в банке ни рубля 🤩 Вот мой метод, детка, — это монополия

custom 54451643052825153865custom 54430629366983728214custom 53370116557651712663custom 53390880104597818172custom 53390193124578824571custom 53392296069415964471custom 53394190794238592811custom 53395273598443573231

3 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC287 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 532143300192872200312custom 539799503740760659410custom 53845669982503218598custom 54430209748678919215custom 54429103193304766252custom 54429353117451707792custom 52829578001278925021custom 54449254707411218351

3 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC270 views60 reactions30 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

￶🚬 Ведь всё должно быть красиво и мы С тобою два эксклюзива немых

custom 539567211723047058415custom 532143300192872200311custom 544497908052290748611custom 53979950374076065945custom 54427344661895109105custom 54449254707411218355custom 52829578001278925024custom 54429353117451707794

3 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC281 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

😈Мы промолчим, чтоб не говорить Вот бы тебя отлюбить прямо здесь, лезь ко мне.

custom 532143300192872200312custom 53843967328618065729custom 53845766533368039728custom 54449254707411218356custom 54449790805229074864custom 54427344661895109103custom 54429103193304766253custom 54430209748678919213

16 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC827 views95 reactions50 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌸 Жизнь слишком коротка, чтобы мы с вами тратили её на любовь.

custom 525570108296895704621custom 527843086164820912617custom 522891315290049011215custom 52400873693144825238custom 52783859191104222968custom 52785475602046066027custom 53732550164653082007custom 52786289111801602896

20 Jun 2026, 19:07 UTC≈1,530 views156 reactions28 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сука мне сосёт, пока я хаваю хот-дог Кетчуп на ковёр — её мамаша ототрёт.

custom 519065051762108250753custom 526923321495365098851custom 527175183102066536048custom 53214330019287220032custom 53843967328618065721custom 53845669982503218591

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MreRtz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mertz | Закрыто” (@MreRtz), 140 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MreRtz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.