Channel
@MultiChainzAnnouncements
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,440subscribers
-126 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001957586238 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MultiChainzAnnouncements |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MultiChainzAnnouncements |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 3,440 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 14:40 | 3,445 | -15 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 3,460 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:24 | 3,472 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 3,481 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 3,485 | -14 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 3,499 | -19 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 3,518 | -15 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 3,533 | -15 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 3,548 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 3,555 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 3,565 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 3,566 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 3,566 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
68 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 58 | 85.3% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 7.35% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
7 things we built, so you'd have to think about zero of them 1/9 We built seven things into multichainz so you'd have to think about zero of them. A short thread on what's actually happening behind your yield. https://x.com/MultichainZ_/status/2085699043909587164?s=20
❤4
💤 While you're doing literally anything else, your yield is compounding in the background. That's the whole feature. That's the tweet. 🚀
❤4
The most underrated feature in defi is ___ We'll start: simulation before execution. 🎯
❤3🔥1
You rarely enter a yield position at the best possible moment. You have a range of risk you're willing to sit in. Use risk rails on MultichainZ to set your risk boundaries before you ever deploy capital. Simulate the outcome first, deploy once it fits your range, let sentinel agents watch it from there. You're never guessing after the fact. https://agent.multichainz.com
❤5
Manual yield farming means constant monitoring, manual rebalancing, and gas fees eating into returns. Agentic yield routing changes that. So what's held you back from making the switch?
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤2👍1
What happens if the market moves while you're offline? That's exactly why we built Sentinel Agents. The Collateral Guardian monitors your borrow positions across chains 24/7. If risk increases, it can top up collateral, repay debt, or unwind positions before liquidation becomes a problem. Set your risk parameters once. Let the agent protect your capital while you sleep.
❤5
Old DeFi: Bridge ➝ Pay gas ➝ Chase yields ➝ Stress. MultichainZ: Set strategy ➝ AI agents execute ➝ Auto-compound ➝ Zero gas drag. Cross-chain automation for conservative, defensive, or delta-neutral strategies—without touching a bridge. Try now: https://agent.multichainz.com
❤3
The Week 3 leaderboard is out. 🏆 The grind has been real. Here's who's been showing up. 👇 🥇 @Cryptoking13983 🥈 @iEddydavid 🥉 @web3wiz284 4️⃣ @0Xsadra 5️⃣ @MdShameem376436 6️⃣ @muhitonx 7️⃣ @mamuslawkey 8️⃣ @79Aliba_ba 9️⃣ @jrbabz 🔟 @grindery_iooo Week 3. Done. 🫡 View full leaderboard 📄 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fksIdzdco0856MuVzw7nhZX2lGEPc_9z/edit?gid=505329176#gid=505329176 Week 4 star…
❤1
Harvesting $50 in yield shouldn't cost $30 in gas and 12 wallet approvals. Our Harvest + Auto-Compound Agent: 🔄 Claims rewards across all your active chains 🔁 Swaps to base assets (USDC/USDT) 📈 Re-deposits for maximum compounding Zero click fatigue. Zero gas drag. Pure efficiency.
❤3😍1
3 steps to automate your wealth in 2026: 1️⃣ Connect your wallet 2️⃣ Deposit USDC or USDT 3️⃣ Pick your AI Strategy Get started for free today https://agent.multichainz.com/
❤1
We currently offer strategies like: • Stable Yield Router 🏦 • Delta-Neutral Yield ⚖️ • Collateral Guardian 🛡️ ...but new agents ship every cycle! What strategy do you want us to automate next? Drop your ideas below👇
❤5
Saw this and thought about every portfolio not running on delta-neutral yield! 😅
❤2👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MultiChainzAnnouncements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Manual yield farming means constant monitoring, manual rebalancing, and gas fees eating into returns. Agentic yield routing changes that. So what's held you back from making the switch?
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
@MultiChainzAnnouncements named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MultichainZ Announcement Channel” (@MultiChainzAnnouncements), 3,440 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MultiChainzAnnouncements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.