Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Musing mind Degen

Channel

Musing mind Degen

@MusingMindDegen

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,782subscribers

+196 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003988612878
TypeChannel
Username@MusingMindDegen
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 22 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MusingMindDegen

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5861,7821,6847 August 2026 — 1,586 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,586 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,587 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,589 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,588 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,664 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,719 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,739 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,748 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,751 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,772 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,782 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 43 days, net +196. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,557–1,811 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:571,782+10
15 Sept 2026, 11:581,772+21
11 Sept 2026, 12:381,751+3
6 Sept 2026, 14:571,748+9
2 Sept 2026, 10:441,739+20
30 Aug 2026, 12:531,719+55
27 Aug 2026, 07:271,664+76
24 Aug 2026, 04:431,588-1
20 Aug 2026, 08:421,589+2
11 Aug 2026, 10:241,587+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:181,586no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:331,586first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

92 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5762.0%
3032.6%
🤡33.26%
👍22.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 00:10 UTC522 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xc1abiBJnEo

🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 00:08 UTC508 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

You mailed into my company a postcard a few weeks back requesting information on penny stocks that had huge upside potential with very little downside risk. Something just came across my desk, John. The name of the company, Aerotyne International. It is a cutting-edge high-tech firm out of the Midwest awaiting imminent patent approval on huge military and civilian applications. Now, right now, John, the stock trades

🔥21

28 Jul 2026, 05:53 UTC916 viewsread 7 August 2026

Highest i have hit so far was 600k, 450k ish RAW like 2.5-3.5x lol My lowest was below 10k RAW lmaoo This is too much fun. Wats your highest so far?

28 Jul 2026, 05:39 UTC871 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Also the win on packs are randomized. you can hit 85 sol TRIPLET pack which gives you instant 45x or you can hit very common packs where you lose 40-50% in sol but can redeem for RAW and wait for price to pump. Its gambling on steroids lol coz you speculate on token price and you get bust on packs or get lucky lol

28 Jul 2026, 05:01 UTC812 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Only 135 Holders rn. so we might be early here. Again i would recommend using a BURNER wallet not main wallet coz thats the security hygiene i always follow on new stuff.

28 Jul 2026, 05:00 UTC926 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Aped $RAW $750k Its similar to FWA on RH which went $40M and currently at 20M. I like it better than FWA coz FWA has Random NFT's from a pool and RIP has Random memecoins like (BONK, WIF, ANSEM, TRIPLET, etc.) USE A BURNER WALLET COZ YOU DIRECTLY INTERACT ON THE WEBSITE AND ITS NEW ONE (RISKY) DONT USE THE BOTS. Can only buy on their website How to buy? Go to the website https://rip.win Connect a BURNER WALLET B

🔥61

26 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC829 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Not good for our bags. was up 2-3x, now down bad coz of this tweet https://x.com/samconnerone/status/2081302993962455539

2

25 Jul 2026, 21:20 UTC≈1,150 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Why i choose to bid on $Architects on Arc chain? On Arc Chain (Circle’s Layer-1 blockchain built for stablecoin finance which has raised $222 Million around 3 Billion valuation), “Architects” refers to participants in the Architects program- Arc’s official community ambassador/contributor program. Its all over their Official website, Docs, Tweets. https://community.arc.io/public/resources/architects-overview https

🔥52

25 Jul 2026, 21:06 UTC811 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Some info on how it works eUSD is a 1:1 derivative, well how it works is. they lock your USDC on Base in a contract and issue eUSD on Arc chain so you can trade any tokens freely. Once the Arc bridge opens they'll bridge those USDC(Base) and migrate eUSD pairs to USDC pairs. So yeah we are trusting Envolpe until mainnet bridge officially opens but the derivates and the tokens like Architects we are buying are issu

🔥3

25 Jul 2026, 20:30 UTC≈3,740 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Bought $ARCHITECTS On Arc chain( Its Circle's chain) at $300k Mcap https://gmgn.ai/arc/token/0xc6d6f1fc29acd081e94909ea60e2307339e551e0 Can Bridge USDC (base) to Arc chain eUSD here (USE A BURNER WALLET) https://envelope.trade/?tab=bridge Lore https://x.com/arc/status/2013703075710836942

🔥42

24 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC775 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WastaDegeneracy

Two CEX listings for $FEFER: MEXC and LBank. Personally, I find it interesting that this kinda stuff is happening on day 2 of fefer. Stable chain’s main page is supporting FEFER as the main memecoin and they’ve posted about GMGN. They clearly want an on-chain season and want volume flowing to their chain. These exchange listings don’t look like a coincidence to me especially when a coin is sub 10m. Give it time

🔥54🤡3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MusingMindDegen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Musing mind Degen” (@MusingMindDegen), 1,782 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MusingMindDegen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.