Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MutolaaGoh 🛋️

Channel

MutolaaGoh 🛋️

@MutolaaGoh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

73subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001535242524
TypeChannel
Username@MutolaaGoh
Created21 January 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MutolaaGoh

Growth

737674.57 August 2026 — 75 subscribers9 August 2026 — 75 subscribers25 August 2026 — 73 subscribers1 September 2026 — 76 subscribers9 September 2026 — 74 subscribers16 September 2026 — 73 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 39 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73–76 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 04:2073-1
9 Sept 2026, 11:0274-2
1 Sept 2026, 01:0576+3
25 Aug 2026, 04:4473-2
9 Aug 2026, 21:3175no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:5575first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

108 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53641024411575530654844.4%
custom 53619159592065003313936.1%
🤓1312.0%
🕊65.56%
21.85%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Iyul sarhisobi 1. Qoʼrqma 7/10 2. Kichkina shahzoda 8/10 3. Sarvqomat dilbarim 7/10 4. Jamila 2/10 Baholar, albatta, mutlaqo shaxsiy. Siz oʼtgan oyda qaysi kitoblarni mutolaa qildingiz?

🕊2

Signed 𝐀𝐧𝐡𝐮

2 Jul 2026, 13:11 UTC56 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Iyun sarhisobi: 1. Mehrobdan Chayon 8/10 2. Qimmatga tushgan xato 6/10 Siz oʼtgan oyda qaysi kitoblarni oʻqidingiz?

🤓3

Signed 𝐀𝐧𝐡𝐮

3 Jun 2026, 15:10 UTC79 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

"Oʼtkan kunlar", "Mehrobdan Chayon" romanlarini avvalroq oʼqimaganimga afsuslandim. Ikkala kitob ham oʼzbek adabiyotining "Ikki eshik orasi"sidek sevimli kitoblarimdan biriga aylandi.

🤓6

Signed 𝐀𝐧𝐡𝐮

3 Mar 2026, 18:17 UTC202 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#sarhisob Fevral 1. Oq soʼyloq 7/10 2. Nur borki, soya bor 5/10 3. Alkimyogar 7/10 4. Jannat sogʼinchi 9/10 - Siz fevralda qaysi kitoblarni oʼqidingiz?

custom 53641024411575530655

Signed 𝐀𝐧𝐡𝐮

20 Feb 2026, 04:57 UTC208 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#manfaatli ... natijada unga oshqozon roʼzasi uchungina olinadigan ajr qoladi, xolos!.. 🌙@MutolaaGoh

custom 53619159592065003316

Signed 𝐀𝐧𝐡𝐮

13 Feb 2026, 08:08 UTC198 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

📚 Alkimyogar Asarda maqsad sari odimlash yoʼlidagi sabot haqida ham foydali koʼrsatmalar keltirilgan. Hajmi kichik kitob. Tavsiya qilaman, albatta.

custom 53619159592065003313custom 53641024411575530653

Signed 𝐀𝐧𝐡𝐮

12 Feb 2026, 06:20 UTC173 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

📚Jannat sogʼinchi kitobidan Riyoning alomatlari 4 tadir

custom 53641024411575530654custom 53619159592065003313

Signed 𝐀𝐧𝐡𝐮

9 Feb 2026, 23:09 UTC152 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#Alkimyogar kitobidan

custom 53641024411575530656custom 53619159592065003315

Signed 𝐀𝐧𝐡𝐮

7 Feb 2026, 15:27 UTC155 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

📖 Nur borki, soya bor haqida Nomidan kelib chiqib kitobda toʼgʼrilik bilan egrilik bayon etilgan. Asarda tashbehlar, tevarak-atrof taʼriflari juda koʼpayib ketgandek tuyildi menga. Keyin men asarga juda qiziqib keta olmadim. Oʼqirkanman oʼzimizning seriallar koʼz oldimda gavdalandi. Nazarimda asar biroz sayozroq yozilgandek. Balki bu Hoshimovning ilk asari boʼlgani uchundir. 🤩 @MutolaaGoh

custom 53641024411575530653custom 53619159592065003311

Signed 𝐀𝐧𝐡𝐮

5 Feb 2026, 10:15 UTC126 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Biz hamma narsaning qadrini o‘zi yo‘qolganidan keyin bilamiz. Hatto bir-birimizning qadrimizni ham. 📖 Nur borki, soya bor 🤩 @MutolaaGoh

custom 53619159592065003313custom 53641024411575530653

Signed 𝐀𝐧𝐡𝐮

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MutolaaGoh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MutolaaGoh 🛋️” (@MutolaaGoh), 73 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MutolaaGoh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.