Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NEELD_tattoo

Channel

NEELD_tattoo

@NEELD_tattoo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

80subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003920967571
TypeChannel
Username@NEELD_tattoo
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 22 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NEELD_tattoo

Growth

728176.58 August 2026 — 72 subscribers9 August 2026 — 72 subscribers17 August 2026 — 74 subscribers1 September 2026 — 81 subscribers11 September 2026 — 80 subscribers808 August 202611 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 34 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71–82 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 02:3880-1
1 Sept 2026, 12:1581+7
17 Aug 2026, 10:0474+2
9 Aug 2026, 22:4572no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:3472first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

174 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54272320222527641388548.9%
custom 54225387353947663523117.8%
custom 52354575749580235922916.7%
custom 54181388334577934542011.5%
custom 520896443855983577695.17%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC78 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Татуировки на кистях считаются одними из самых сложных в работе. Кожа в этой зоне тонкая и постоянно подвергается нагрузке, трению и частому обновлению. Из-за этого пигмент может приживаться хуже, чем на других участках тела, поэтому со временем возможны выпадения цвета. Именно поэтому тату на кистях практически всегда требуют коррекции, а иногда и не одной.

custom 54272320222527641386custom 52089644385598357763

1 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC78 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Обе работы буду доделывать на коррекции через 2 месяца

custom 54272320222527641386custom 54181388334577934542

1 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC78 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

И вторая сегодняшняя работа такая черная сколопендра

custom 54225387353947663525custom 54181388334577934542

1 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC70 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня забил кисть в трайбл, часть делал фрихендом

custom 54272320222527641389

16 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC162 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем делать татушки, сегодня вышла такая работа

custom 542253873539476635212custom 52354575749580235925custom 54272320222527641382custom 52089644385598357761custom 54181388334577934541

13 Jul 2026, 13:27 UTC183 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Такая сегодня получилась лилия, сделал за 3 часа

custom 542723202225276413814custom 54181388334577934544

9 Jul 2026, 15:10 UTC187 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас ищу моделей на такие проекты, цены очень приятные

custom 542723202225276413810

9 Jul 2026, 15:09 UTC164 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Недавно купил такие классные иглы от WJX

custom 52354575749580235927custom 54272320222527641386

3 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC205 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вторая прекрасная работа заняла 1,5 часа

custom 54181388334577934547custom 54272320222527641386custom 54225387353947663522

3 Jul 2026, 11:44 UTC201 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

2,5 часа работы и получилась такая крутая татуировка

custom 542723202225276413810custom 52089644385598357765custom 54181388334577934542custom 54225387353947663522

27 Jun 2026, 09:16 UTC263 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

И такая вторая работа за вчерашний день

custom 523545757495802359210custom 54225387353947663526custom 54272320222527641385

27 Jun 2026, 09:13 UTC234 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вчера сделал такую работу с обложки альбома SALUKI

custom 542723202225276413810custom 54225387353947663524custom 54181388334577934542

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @NEELD_tattoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NEELD_tattoo” (@NEELD_tattoo), 80 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NEELD_tattoo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.