黑金版/瓦版 1.更新解密 2.增强稳定性 3.更换驱动和重构底层代码 注:一定要重启设备才能完成本次更新‼️ 和平更新了占坑检测 开解密会有概率行为10 (这个问题黑金版已经解决了)✅ 注:特别版还在重构驱动和源码中(如果玩特别版出现了闪框加密 先不要玩这个号 去玩别的号 不要开解密 否则会行为10) 等特别版更新好了 在开解密玩‼️ (不开解密 不会有影响) 您觉得是辅助问题 大可不必玩 您就尽快更换产品 放过我们彼此谢谢 最后感谢所有支持与信任NL的客户们 所有版本未到期的用户加3天时间⭐

Channel
NL内核官方主频道
@NLNHGF
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
40,151subscribers
+136 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001849849355 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NLNHGF |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NLNHGF |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 40,151 | +6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 40,145 | +13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 40,132 | +15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 40,117 | +37 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 40,080 | +16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 40,064 | +23 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 40,041 | +26 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 40,015 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.51%
- avg views ÷ 40,151 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,210
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (30 June 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 30,960 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 26s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
稳定奔放🥰 点我进入NL官方卡网 👋 点我当代理赚大米 😊 没钱想免费玩点我😀 NL产品介绍点我查看 ❤️ 反馈 @NLNHGF6🥰
1.NL并没有集体拉闸 2.关于昨天说的追踪上检测问题 (有几个人反馈行为10和一些俱乐部高端挂也出现了拉闸) 本人出于好心让用户们先观察一波 结果一些傻逼在外面说NL集体了 然后吹嘘自己项目非常稳定 纯脑残来的 几个项目加起来用户没NL一半多 NL每天日活跃用户5-6k 总结:没有任何问题 正常玩即可 (不要听风就是雨 ) 最后那些傻逼说NL集体的 拿用户数据说话OK?NL拉闸怎么还有这么多人玩呢 还是那句话 :人红是非多 树大招风
稳定奔放🥰 点我进入NL官方卡网 👋 点我当代理赚大米 😊 没钱想免费玩点我😀 NL产品介绍点我查看 ❤️ 反馈 @NLNHGF6🥰
瓦解密云更新了 重启设备即可更新完成‼️ 一定要重启设备 (选择断点解密) 全体未到期用户集体加一天⭐
瓦解密在更新啦 不要催啦 晚点统一加时间 更新好了我会在群里通知的
黑金版/瓦版 1.更新解密 2.提升流畅度 3.修复用户反馈bug 注:一定要重启设备才能完成本次更新‼️
稳定奔放🥰 点我进入NL官方卡网 👋 点我当代理赚大米 😊 没钱想免费玩点我😀 NL产品介绍点我查看 ❤️ 反馈 @NLNHGF6🥰
特别版/黑金版/瓦版 1.更新解密 重启设备即可更新完成✅ 一定要重启设备‼️ 所有版本没到期的用户集体加一天时间 反馈问题格式(尽量描述清楚 方便修复) 玩的那个版本: 设备: 内核版本: 处理器: 遇到的问题bug: 玩了多久游戏出现的bug: 最好提供视频: 按照以上格式反馈给我 谢谢 (不按照要求反馈问题不予处理‼️) @NLNHGF6
黑金和瓦 1.更新驱动增强稳定性和流畅度 2.更新解密 重启设备即可更新完成✅
黑金更新: 1.优化地图雷达 2.更新模型解密 3.安全区预测 轰炸区 毒圈绘制 瓦: 1.更新压枪算法 自适应压枪 2.新增开镜/不开镜 压枪分开调节 3.新增 5m内自瞄范围和速度调节 4.喷子自瞄范围 和 速度调节
特别版更新如下: 1.更新密钥解密 2.更新信号枪子弹剩余数量 3.更新加手雷预测和手雷落点和瞬爆倒计时 4.更新控件位置固定 5.添加载追轮胎 6.优化辅助流畅度和增强稳定性 黑金更新如下: 1.更新密钥解密 2.更新信号枪子弹剩余数量 3. 更新控件位置固定 4.添加载追轮胎 5.更新全网首发不用调节的地图雷达和迫击炮雷达 6.修复个别用户卡屏和掉后台问题 7.优化辅助流畅度和增强稳定性 注:重启设备-重新启动apk-上游戏即可完成更新
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @NLNHGF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,001,579 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NL内核官方主频道” (@NLNHGF), 40,151 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NLNHGF.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.