👀👀👀奶龙 Kernel更新1.1版本 1.修复部分用户解密失效 请前往网盘下载更新
👍2🕊1

Channel
@NLNHZPD
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,240subscribers
-131 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004482322135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NLNHZPD |
| Created | 15 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NLNHZPD |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 2,240 | -21 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 2,261 | -29 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:04 | 2,290 | -13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 2,303 | -19 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 2,322 | -22 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 2,344 | -25 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 2,369 | -10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 2,379 | -21 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 2,400 | -23 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:21 | 2,423 | +39 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 2,384 | +13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 2,371 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 2,371 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
34 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 19 | 55.9% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 17.6% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 11.8% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👀👀👀奶龙 Kernel更新1.1版本 1.修复部分用户解密失效 请前往网盘下载更新
👍2🕊1
📣8月7日用户反馈 市场唯一真算法解密 ⚠️无视强标 不闪框 不卡框 无需选区界面开启 无需切区 📲内置独家驱动支持4.9-6.12所有设备 🤩独家算法自瞄绝不空任何一个技能 ✔️局内秒刷满血不掉线美化支持全皮肤 🔗点我获取奶龙算法解密 🩵TG官方频道 🩵TG交流频道 ✉️合作/反馈/售后: @NLNHKF
👍3❤1🕊1
📣8月6日用户反馈稳定连打 市场唯一真算法解密 ⚠️无视强标 不闪框 不卡框 无需选区界面开启 无需切区 📲内置独家驱动支持4.9-6.12所有设备 🤩独家算法自瞄绝不空任何一个技能 ✔️局内秒刷满血不掉线美化支持全皮肤 🔗点我获取奶龙算法解密 🩵TG官方频道 🩵TG交流群 ✉️合作/反馈/售后: @NLNHKF
👍4❤1
奶龙 Kernel市场唯一不动内存解密 🔺绝非断点、hook、指针解密以及内置端口 📣无需选区界面开启解密 无需切区 无需局内开启 支持任何场景下启用 ➡️完美解决王者全新加密 不卡框 不掉框 不偏框 📲兼容4.9-6.12都有设备 无需手动刷入驱动 👉局内秒刷美化支持全皮肤满血无缺陷不掉线美化 🚀高度自定义绘制 支持兵线野怪射线方框 😀OpenGL Vulkan及超级流畅的CPU渲染 让你免受安卓15 GPU渲染带来的影响 ⚡60-144刷新率无极刷新极致优化避免卡顿掉帧 🚀独家算法自瞄 绝不空任何一个技能 🩵官方频道 https://t.me/NLNHZPD https://t.me/NLNHZPD https://t.me/NLZHZPD 📱官方交流群 https://t.me/NLJLPD 🔗赞助地址 https://luoye.chyidc.cn/shop/NLNH ✉️售后/反馈/合作 @NLNHKF
👍10🕊4🤡4🤔2🎉1
Signed 1
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @NLNHZPD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@NLNHZPD named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“奶龙主频道” (@NLNHZPD), 2,240 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NLNHZPD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.