Channel
NOSSA REVISTA
@NOSSAREVISTABR
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,982subscribers
+948 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001416949817 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NOSSAREVISTABR |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NOSSAREVISTABR |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:17 | 19,982 | +11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:05 | 19,971 | +12 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 19,959 | +4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:15 | 19,955 | +32 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:21 | 19,923 | +6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 19,917 | +8 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 19,909 | +14 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 00:41 | 19,895 | +15 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 22:34 | 19,880 | +9 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:18 | 19,871 | +25 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 16:56 | 19,846 | +46 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 19,800 | +56 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 12:41 | 19,744 | +70 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 19,674 | +140 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 19,534 | +15 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:38 | 19,519 | +9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 19,510 | +27 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 19,483 | +29 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 19,454 | +44 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 19,410 | first reading |
Engagement
No public post preview. We read this entry on 16 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@estantehistorica · 10,324#1
@galeriacult · 6,567#2
@bibliotecadorick · 8,188#3
@cantinhodoprofessor · 13,557#4
@oinformanteof · 162,032#5
@feedbrasil · 9,520#6
@brasileogasa100real · 16,833#7
@juginger · 5,655#8
@Bibliopressora · 3,496#9
@BibliotecaDeHumanidades · 5,044#10
@TramasAmoresBR · 88,670#11
@beyondlibrary · 6,197#12
@NOSSOQUADRINHO · 14,218#13
@bibliotecateologicaefilosofica · 2,338#14
@somosumcomoCriador · 16,546#15
@BibliotecaEBD · 11,704#16
@TreinePortuguesTodososDias · 9,540#17
@cmu1169 · 12,790#18
@historia_br · 13,188#19
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@adoramosromancesebook · 37,643
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 1 September 2026
@psicologialivros · 72,594
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 20 August 2026
@skeelo_br · 42,290
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 29 August 2026
@doraminhascompleto · 69,155
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 20 August 2026
@cantinhodelivros · 44,013
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 19 here — alongside 18 others — read 29 August 2026
@ladyofbook · 65,972
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 19 here — alongside 18 others — read 21 August 2026
@hyesers · 39,855
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 29 August 2026
@materiaisdeconcursos · 78,859
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 19 August 2026
@LEITURA_BR · 170,449
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 16 August 2026
@TramasAmoresBR · 88,670
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 17 August 2026
@educamais · 66,437
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 20 August 2026
@BibliotecaCrista · 26,759
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 24 August 2026
@IndicoShorts · 76,283
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 18 August 2026
@livroscatolicosbrasil · 39,346
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 31 August 2026
@ladyqueentips · 48,492
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NOSSA REVISTA” (@NOSSAREVISTABR), 19,982 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NOSSAREVISTABR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.