شـبكــة اليمن الإخبارية pinned a photo

Channel
شـبكــة اليمن الإخبارية
@NWSYEME
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
111,888subscribers
-3,687 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001013814061 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NWSYEME |
| Description | 📰 تغطية شاملة لأهم الأخبار والمستجدات ⚡ متابعة مستمرة • محتوى يومي متميز • مصداقية وسرعة بالنشر This channel aims to fight terrorism and extremism and rejection of violence and call for peace and love يمكنكم التوصل معنا عبر البوت التالي @NWYEMbot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NWSYEME |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 111,888 | -105 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 111,993 | -139 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:02 | 112,132 | -167 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 112,299 | -55 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 112,354 | +7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 112,347 | -149 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 112,496 | -138 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 112,634 | -129 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:53 | 112,763 | -117 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:04 | 112,880 | -113 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 112,993 | -102 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 113,095 | -94 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 113,189 | -84 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 113,273 | -94 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 113,367 | -64 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 113,431 | -120 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 113,551 | -132 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 113,683 | -192 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 113,875 | -132 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 114,007 | first reading |
Engagement
1,317 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.21%
- avg views ÷ 111,888 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,350
- 848 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.806%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 862
- of 1,317 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 802 of 848 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,317 (5 August 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,143,569 |
| Reactions total | 9,055 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Sept 2026, 21:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈54,600
- Videos
- ≈34,200
- Links
- ≈94,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 02m
- Average length
- 2m 01s
Measured directly from 91 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,265 reactions across 924 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,327 | 32.4% | |
| 🔥 | 2,781 | 27.1% | |
| 👍 | 1,803 | 17.6% | |
| 🤣 | 402 | 3.92% | |
| 🤬 | 355 | 3.46% | |
| 😁 | 328 | 3.20% | |
| 🖕 | 311 | 3.03% | |
| 👎 | 234 | 2.28% | |
| 💔 | 178 | 1.73% | |
| 👏 | 153 | 1.49% | |
| 🥰 | 66 | 0.643% | |
| 😢 | 55 | 0.536% | |
| 😱 | 51 | 0.497% | |
| 🫡 | 37 | 0.36% | |
| 🤮 | 36 | 0.351% | |
| 🤪 | 33 | 0.321% | |
| 🤩 | 26 | 0.253% | |
| 🎉 | 18 | 0.175% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 0.175% | |
| 👌 | 17 | 0.166% | |
| 8 further kinds | 36 | 0.351% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 931 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,265 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 15 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
هيئة علماء فلسطين تدين اقتحام نتنياهو أنفاق المسجد الأقصى وتدعو لحماية المقدسات. أدانت هيئة علماء فلسطين اقتحام رئيس حكومة العدو الصهيوني مجرم الحرب المطلوب لمحكمة الجنايات الدولية، بنيامين نتنياهو، للمسجد الأقصى المبارك عبر الحفريات والأنفاق أسفل المسجد، وما رافق ذلك من تصريحات صهيونية تزعم حقاً في المكان، معتبرةً ذلك حلقة جديدة في مشروع فرض السيادة الصهيونية على الأقصى ومحيطه.
صحيفة "فايننشال تايمز": ارتفع سعر زيت الأساس من المجموعة الثالثة (المادة الخام الرئيسية لزيوت المحركات الاصطناعية بالكامل) في الولايات المتحدة بنحو أربعة أضعاف منذ فبراير، ليصل إلى مستوى قياسي بلغ 12.45 دولارًا للغالون. وتجاوزت هذه الزيادة بكثير ارتفاع أسعار النفط الخام والبنزين والديزل. _ أدى النقص العالمي في زيوت المحركات إلى فرض قيود على شراء هذه المنتجات في المتاجر الكبرى. وفرضت سلسلة كوستكو حدًا على كمية زيت ال…
❤2
رفع الجاهزية القصوى اتخذت القوات المسلحة الإيرانية إجراءات استثنائية لرفع مستوى الجاهزية العملياتية إلى الدرجة القصوى على كافة المحاور (الجوية، البرية، والبحرية) تحسباً لأي مواجهة عسكرية محتملة.
❤15🔥4👍1
> تزوّد لليوم.. بوردك اليومي > 📚 محطتنا اليوم: 👈 الصفحات من 477 إلى 480 > "البركة والتوفيق لا تأتي إلا لمن جعل لكلام الله نصيباً من يومه. لا تؤجل وردك، واجعل آيات الله غيثاً يروي تفاصيل يومك ويمنحك القوة والرضا." > نسأل الله لنا ولكم التوفيق والقبول يا رب. > شاركونا بـ (❤️) لمن أتم ورد اليوم > #شبكة_اليمن_الإخبارية
❤7
صحيفةٌ باكستانية تتحدّث عن عملية يمنية هي الأكثر تأثيرًا على السعودية #شبكة_اليمن_الإخبارية /متابعات جزمت صحيفة «داون» الباكستانية بأن أُولى الضربات اليمنية على الرياض تضيفُ مزيدًا من الضغوط على المملكة السعودية؛ فقد شوهدت سحابةُ دخان كبيرة فوق الرياض وتصاعُدُ ألسنة النيران قُربَ مطارها الرئيسي، السبت، عقب سماع انفجارات، بالتزامن مع تحذيراتٍ سعودية من خطر متجدد. وتشير الصحيفة إلى أن الحادثَ يمثل أول تهديد للعاصمة …
👍6🔥1
وول ستريت جورنال: - إدارة ترامب تستعد لفرض عقوبات واسعة النطاق على المحكمة الجنائية الدولية بعد أن أصدرت مذكرة توقيف بحق نتنياهو وول ستريت جورنال عن وثائق: العقوبات ستمنع المحكمة الجنائية الدولية من إجراء معاملات بالدولار وتعزلها عن النظام المالي العالمي
🤣10❤3🔥1
الدفاع الروسية: أسقطنا 1951 مسيرة أوكرانية و8 صواريخ كروز بعيدة المدى فوق الأراضي الروسية خلال يوم واحد
👍7🔥1
⭕️ عــــــاجــــــل ⟩⟩ القدرات العسكرية الأيرانية تنشر ترقّبوا بعد قليل سنعلن عن تفاصيل هامة وحساسة للغاية
❤16👍3🤔2🔥1
سي إن إن: فيديو «الإنزال السعودي في صنعاء» قديم ولا علاقة له باليمن ... كشفت شبكة CNN بالعربية أن مقطع الفيديو الذي جرى تداوله على منصات التواصل الاجتماعي باعتباره يوثق عملية إنزال جوي لقوات سعودية في العاصمة صنعاء، لا علاقة له بالتصعيد العسكري الأخير في اليمن. وأوضحت الشبكة أن الفيديو أظهر مروحية تنزل جنودًا بالحبال إلى سطح مبنى خلال الليل، وجرى تداوله على نطاق واسع من قبل حسابات ومنصات مؤيدة للسعودية، مع ادعاءات …
🔥8
⭕️ عــــــاجــــــل ⟩⟩ متحدث قوات صنعاء العميد يحيى سريع: شن الطيران الحربي السعودي خلال الـ24 ساعة الماضية 28 غارة جوية من خلال طائرات "F15" و "تايفون" أقلعت من قاعدتي خميس مشيط والطائف استهدفت محافظات تعز والجوف ومأرب ليبلغ إجمالي الغارات منذ بدء التصعيد السعودي على بلدِنا وشعبنا 760 غارة جوية. #التصعيد_بالتصعيد ❇️ــــــــــــــــــــــــــ كن قريبًا من الحدث.. وكن أول من يعرف! 📲 👈 تليجرام t.me/NWSYEME 👈 انضموا…
😱4🔥2🤬2
⭕️ عــــــاجــــــل ⟩⟩ حركة حماس: ندعو أبناء شعبنا إلى شدّ الرحال والرباط في المسجد الأقصى المبارك، وتكثيف الحضور فيه دفاعًا عن القدس والأقصى وحمايةً له من محاولات تغيير واقعه وهويته.
❤11👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,317 posts we hold for @NWSYEME. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@ALYEMENNET · 197,692#1
@Hadeel_eisaa · 142,280#2
@yaseenpress2004 · 146,569#3
@akhbar_alme7war · 112,960#4
@httpsBbmFFFhNGNi · 106,049#5
@newsyemn · 133,424#6
@Compass_News33 · 92,170#7
@NewsPs0 · 60,747#8
@maydan_news · 147,555#9
@httpshgfhskskdkd · 40,701#10
@AliSalemps · 83,530#11
@ajanews · 1,324,224#12
@pales_jerus · 159,371#13
@utufan · 3,204#14
@rueib_alkian · 120,453#15
@Gazaplatform · 58,462#16
@me7war313mokawama · 131,553#17
@Alomhoar · 254,150#18
@fatehpress · 107,001#19
@saraya2jinin · 74,380#20
@Djgfhjh · 93,762#21
@Aree3_jenin · 80,959#22
@Gaza_media07 · 76,360#23
@Hebrewtranslation · 117,390#24
@mehwaralmokawma · 105,414#25
@APrees · 132,498#26
@N_FFG · 115,102#27
@almasirah2 · 208,830#28
@El_shareef_mahmoud · 47,803#29
@shababpress_ar · 39,134#30
@hamza20300 · 758,959#31
@v_h33 · 111,363#32
@Healthfory0u · 110,472#33
@RasadAlmedan · 80,345#34
@Yemen_Sana_anews · 76,211#35
@GazaNowGaz · 182,410#36
@Almustashaar2 · 146,678#37
@ALYEMENNETV · 31,773#38
@rasedal3ado138e · 112,504#39
@muhamadalsharif · 84,238#40
@stepnews · 71,773#41
@almayadeen · 476,945#42
@qudsn · 621,261#43
@khaledvoar · 99,814#44
@Palestine_Trade_Agency · 42,251#45
@messa054 · 85,349#46
@PopularMediaYEV · 100,626#47
@hazempress · 64,098#48
@Googlalsker1 · 97,458#49
@SidqYem · 39,404#50
@Nablusgheer · 387,530#51
@hpress · 534,595#52
@RoaaWarStudies · 225,904#53
@ajMubasher · 355,141#54
@Electrohizbullah · 178,709#55
@army21ye · 256,383#56
@jenin_live1 · 13,821#57
@caroller · 5,884#58
@Warlife3 · 120,554#59
@BoqashEcon · 39,406#60
@Naba_yem · 40,429#61
@aizah9 · 116,503#62
@saedalzaneen8 · 164,020#63
@AlarabyTelevision · 332,298#64
@Almiddan · 18,907#65
@BalaNews30 · 90,319#66
@SS0SXS · 43,167#67
@Breaknewsa · 5,959#68
@sahabhnews · 6,488#69
@mtqdmon · 532,038#70
@balata_alhadat · 47,720#71
@bisharalibrary · 132,930#72
@mayadeenchannel · 179,659#73
@Al_gaofy · 16,125#74
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Healthfory0u · 110,472
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
@newsyemn · 133,424
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
@alharisnet · 32,513
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 5 September 2026
@BoqashEcon · 39,406
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 August 2026
@SidqYem · 39,404
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 31 August 2026
@SS0SXS · 43,167
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 August 2026
@shababpress_ar · 39,134
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
@Yemen_Sana_anews · 76,211
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
@bisharalibrary · 132,930
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
@stepnews · 71,773
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
@PopularMediaYEV · 100,626
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
@Googlalsker1 · 97,458
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
@v_h33 · 111,363
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@GazaNowGaz · 182,410
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@khaledvoar · 99,814
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
@N_FFG · 115,102
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
@MohammedAyash0 · 29,888
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
@YEducaton · 61,759
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
@akhbar_alme7war · 112,960
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
@Naba_yem · 40,429
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
@Maysa9718 · 121,162
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
@ahmedaljoby55 · 51,633
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
@a_a_o9 · 42,384
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
@Almustashaar2 · 146,678
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شـبكــة اليمن الإخبارية” (@NWSYEME), 111,888 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NWSYEME.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.