Channel
@NajmCrypto
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,687subscribers
-1,451 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002240742911 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NajmCrypto |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 52 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NajmCrypto |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
15.2 average views per post against 12,743 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.119%. Across the 4,836 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,004–31,619 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.98% and 14.2%, with a median of 7.18%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 46 of 46 published in the window (46 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 698 |
| Mature posts only | 0.139% over 30 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 12,743 measured 4 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:ara · 4,836 channels · p10 1.05% · p25 2.98% · p50 7.18% · p75 14.2% · p90 25.0% |
| Position in cohort | 0.724th percentile · 1/59 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.227% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Arabic · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:56 | 12,687 | -13 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 10:40 | 12,700 | -11 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 11:57 | 12,711 | -16 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:27 | 12,727 | -16 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 14:15 | 12,743 | -19 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:26 | 12,762 | -13 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:49 | 12,775 | -16 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:17 | 12,791 | -16 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 19:00 | 12,807 | -14 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:51 | 12,821 | -24 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:59 | 12,845 | -19 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:40 | 12,864 | -13 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:00 | 12,877 | -14 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:51 | 12,891 | -20 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:18 | 12,911 | -12 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 12,923 | -12 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:20 | 12,935 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:26 | 12,943 | -23 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 00:06 | 12,966 | -16 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:47 | 12,982 | first reading |
278 posts held, back to 19 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 86 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 278 (19 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,568 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 07:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 278 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 278 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 86 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🐪 حملة «القافلة» من بينانس بدأت رسمياً — مكافآت مليون USDC لحد 30 نوفمبر ⏳ الحملة فيها كذا نشاط في مكان واحد: 🎁 قسيمة لحد 20 USDC من أول تداول ليك 🏆 مسابقات تداول بجوائز 75,000 USDC 📈 أنشطة على الأسهم المرمّزة bStocks وعلى Earn 🌍 الأنشطة المتاحة بتختلف حسب بلدك — صفحة الحملة بتوريك المتاح عندك 📊 تشارك إزاي خطوة بخطوة؟ 1️⃣ اعمل حساب بينانس الأول بكود الدعوة اللي تحت — ولو عندك حساب عدّي للخطوة الجاية 2️⃣ كمّل توثيق …
📊 مؤشر الخوف والطمع في سوق العملات المشفرة 🧭 قيمة المؤشر: 28 😱 المشاعر السائدة: خوف 💰 سعر البيتكوين: 75874 دولار أمريكي
شهدت صناديق الاستثمار المتداولة في سوق البيتكوين الفورية الأمريكية تدفقات صافية خارجة بقيمة 1.28 مليار دولار هذا الأسبوع، وهو أعلى مستوى منذ يونيو.
تخطط وزارة الخزانة الأمريكية لإعادة شراء ديون بقيمة تصل إلى 95 مليار دولار خلال الربع القادم. إشارة إيجابية لعملة البيتكوين!
تكتسب قصة البنوك التي تستخدم البيتكوين زخماً متزايداً. ليس هذا بالأمر المفاجئ، فكلٌّ من سايلور وفونغ يطرحان الفكرة تدريجياً بشكلٍ أكثر وضوحاً.
تقرير قناة "سي إن بي سي" الذي يشاهده ملايين المشاهدين: أصبح بإمكان الأمريكيين الآن استخدام البيتكوين للتأهل للحصول على قروض عقارية لشراء المنازل. سوق الإسكان الأمريكي، الذي تبلغ قيمته 130 تريليون دولار، أصبح الآن متاحًا لعملة البيتكوين.
بيتكوين تصل إلى 75,000 دولار.
قام شخص ما بشراء ما قيمته 228 مليون دولار من البيتكوين أمس. المستثمرون يستفيدون إلى أقصى حد من هذا الانخفاض!
يقول يورين تيمر من شركة فيديليتي إنه لا يزال يفضل البيتكوين على الذهب، مشيرًا إلى أن السعر النسبي للبيتكوين لا يزال ثابتًا على الرغم من انخفاض كلا الأصلين.
🐪 حملة «القافلة» من بينانس بدأت رسمياً — مكافآت مليون USDC لحد 30 نوفمبر ⏳ الحملة فيها كذا نشاط في مكان واحد: 🎁 قسيمة لحد 20 USDC من أول تداول ليك 🏆 مسابقات تداول بجوائز 75,000 USDC 📈 أنشطة على الأسهم المرمّزة bStocks وعلى Earn 🌍 الأنشطة المتاحة بتختلف حسب بلدك — صفحة الحملة بتوريك المتاح عندك 📊 تشارك إزاي خطوة بخطوة؟ 1️⃣ اعمل حساب بينانس الأول بكود الدعوة اللي تحت — ولو عندك حساب عدّي للخطوة الجاية 2️⃣ كمّل توثيق …
السيناتور جيمس تالاريكو، الذي تم انتخابه حديثًا عن الحزب الديمقراطي في ولاية تكساس، صوت لصالح قرار تخصيص أموال لشراء وتخزين البيتكوين. البيتكوين يتجاوز الانقسامات السياسية في أمريكا.
الذهب يصل إلى $4000 دولار
Showing the 12 most recent of 278 posts we hold for @NajmCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نجم الكريبتو Crypto Btc 📈” (@NajmCrypto), 12,687 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NajmCrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.