Channel
@Najvaagar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,096subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001908333688 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Najvaagar |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Najvaagar |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 1,096 | -2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 1,098 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 1,099 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 1,102 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 1,104 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 1,107 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 1,108 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 1,109 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:11 | 1,110 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 1,110 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
255 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 155 | 60.8% | |
| 💔 | 51 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 27 | 10.6% | |
| 🤨 | 8 | 3.14% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 2.75% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 1.57% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.784% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.392% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 255 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
خیلی اتفاقی از طرف عزیزی به دستم رسید. داشتم صبحانه میخوردم که شروع کردم به خواندن و چای نوشیدن که دیدم رسیدهام به صفحهی پنجاه. به گمانم کتابِ درست همین است. اساساً متنِ درست همین است. در مقدمه آمده است که یک روز پاییزی، مرد خوشپوشی میآید دفتر ویل دورانت و در آرامش به او میگوید قصد دارد خودش را بکشد مگر آنکه فیلسوف قصهی ما بتواند دلیل معتبری برایش بیاورد که این کار را نکند. و همین حضور غریب پاییزی، میشود دل…
❤13
زنان هر چند سست و ناتوانند دلآرایِ دِلیرانِ جهانند •بیت از مثنوی ویس و رامین ✍🏻: فخرالدین اسعد گرگانی ~ جمله از زبان ویس است با دایهاش. زنان علیه زنان و جهان علیه زنان. #شکسته_بخوان
😢5👍4❤3
در دشتِ توهم جهتی نیست معیّن ما را چه ضرور است بدانیم کجاییم •بیت از غزل ✍🏻: بیدل دهلوی ~بی در کجا #شکسته_بخوان
❤11
روزگاری ست که محروم شدیم از ستمش یادِ آن روز که خون در جگرِ ما میکرد •بیت از غزل ✍🏻: غیرتی شیرازی ~خودآزاری نهادینه شده در شعر فارسی به جای شکرگزاری از هجر معشوق ستمگر. #شکسته_بخوان
💔12❤9
معروف شد به «نیمای غزل» از طرف علیمحمد حقشناس؛ لقبی که پیشترها شفیعیکدکنی داده بود به ناتلخانلری. حالا درست است کاری که نیما در عرصهی شعر کرد، سیمین بهبهانی نکرد اما به هر حال، او یکی از شاعرانی بود که زیر تابوت محتضر غزل فارسی را گرفت، راهش را از گورستان کج کرد، به آن نفس داد، وزن داد، کیفیت داد و ادامه داد. بیست و هشتم تیرماه متولد شد و بیست و هشتم مردادماه درگذشت. غزلوار که نگاهش کنیم، گویی همهی عمرش سیرو…
❤15👍2
هر آن کس که در بیم و اندوه زیست بر آن زندگی زار باید گریست •بیت از شاهنامه ✍🏻: فردوسی ~میبینی اوضاع ما را آقای فردوسی؟ بیا تا بنشینیم و یک دل سیر زار بزنیم و چایِ شور بنوشیم. #شکسته_بخوان
💔12❤2👍1🤨1😢1
«بدن نمادین (سیاسی) همینکه واقعاً شکل گرفت دیگر به سادگی از بین نمیرود. هملت میگفت: بدن با شاه است اما شاه با بدن نیست. از دیدگاه نشانهشناسی، این بدن یک نشانهی بزرگ است که یک مدلول خاص ندارد و هر آنکه به درون این نشانهی تهی راه یابد، ممکن است ماسک آن را بر چهره بزند. به همین دلیل میگویند: شاه هرگز نمیمیرد.» •دو بدن شاه تأملاتی دربارهی نشانهشناسی بدن و قدرت ✍🏻:احمد اخوت #بند_آغازین
👍6❤1👎1
اینکه پسر یالوم به زندگیاش پایان داده، نشان از این نیست که دانش روانپزشکیِ پدرش در علاج او عاجز بوده؛ بلکه صدای سیلی این حقیقت است به صورت انسانِ معاصر که انسان از درمان انسان ناتوان است؛ حتی اگر بداند و بخواهد و بکوشد. ✍🏻: آبان #بند_تنبیه
💔8🤨3👍1
مُکدر است دل آتش به خرقه خواهم زد بیا ببین که کــــــــــرا میکند تماشایی •بیت از غزل ✍🏻: حافظ #شکسته_بخوان
❤7
گاه، «نوشتن»، کنشی گریزناپذیر و تکرارشونده در پاسخ به اضطرابی چارهناپذیر است. کنشی که ربطِ مستقیم و معناداری به آن اضطرابِ خاص ندارد. در چنین حالتی، «نوشتن»، نمونهی نابِ وسواسِ اجباری (OCD) است: اضطرابی که قرار است با کلمات قرار بگیرد (و نمیگیرد). #ابراهیم_سلطانی @ThePleasureOftheText
❤4
یادم افتاد که مدتهاست فصل هفتم را خواندهام. گمانم روزهای جنگِ آشکار بود. مدتهاست واژهها را به صدا بدل کردهام. اما هنوز نشده تا سر و تهشان را به هم بچسبانم و سامان دهم. چهقدر خستهام و یادم نبود که خستهام. ✍🏻: آبان
❤4💔4
📝 داستانک زبانم را درآورده بودم و لبهای نوچم را میلیسیدم که باد پیچید توی قبرستان. خاک چرخ زد توی هوا، مردها چشمهاشان را تنگ کردند و با دست پوشاندند. زنها که پرِ چادرهای سیاهشان را گرفتهبودند جلوی چشم و زار میزدند، مچالهتر شدند. جمعیت سیاهپوش در هم لولید. پیدا بود خسته شدهاند. میخواستند زودتر بروند سمت مینیبوس آبی که زیر کاجهای آن طرف جاده پارک شده بود. چادر عمه بلقیس را کشیدم: «گشنمه!» عمه سرش …
❤6💔4😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Najvaagar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نجواگـــر اسبها” (@Najvaagar), 1,096 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Najvaagar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.