Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +263. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,257–6,665 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 16:42
6,567
-11
11 Sept 2026, 17:20
6,578
-17
6 Sept 2026, 18:39
6,595
-13
2 Sept 2026, 02:34
6,608
-10
29 Aug 2026, 20:27
6,618
+1
26 Aug 2026, 15:23
6,617
+32
23 Aug 2026, 19:35
6,585
-16
20 Aug 2026, 00:57
6,601
+38
16 Aug 2026, 20:27
6,563
+112
12 Aug 2026, 23:57
6,451
+27
10 Aug 2026, 05:38
6,424
+83
6 Aug 2026, 19:40
6,341
+37
6 Aug 2026, 03:21
6,304
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:52
6,304
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
31s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
678 reactions across 25 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
374
55.2%
👍
171
25.2%
❤
111
16.4%
😁
11
1.62%
🫡
11
1.62%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 678 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 27 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NakbaevBTC. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 May 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⬆️ Выше моя статистика за 30 дней (всего было три сделки) - WinRate 100%
🔘А также, статистика за все время - WinRate 65%
❗️Главный вывод этого месяца: меньше сделок - больше профита.
p.s. Если хотите повторять за мной мои сделки, пишите @skalleta
⬅️Теория вероятности для троечников от троечника
🔘Не думал что прошлый пост наберет столько реакций, но если интерес есть - нужно делать!
🔘На первой фотке мой младший брат - ему 15 лет, по алгебра тройка (это потому что двойку ставить нельзя). Он и будет моей фокус-группой на котором обкатаю материал перед выпуском, чтобы понятно было каждому. В сентябре все будет готово!
p.s. У меня всего есть два кровных родных …
#MU (Micron Technology)
🔘Взял небольшую позицию (с риском в $100) на повышение с целью обновления исторического максимума. Ожидаю рост примерно на 25% в ближайшие недели. Глобальный тренд устойчивый, локально актив проявляет силу.
⚡️Торгую на Bitget (по ссылке - скидка 20% на торговые комиссии).
🗃 Математика
💡 До 10-го класса я был твёрдым троечником, считал, что не для меня все эти расчёты/цифры/формулы. Пока родители не наняли мне репетитора для подготовки к ЕНТ (экзамен после 11-го класса). В итоге репетитор довёл меня до международной олимпиады по прикладной математике в Корее и до призового места 🥉 (+ большая удача, что не участвовали таланты из России 😅, которые забрали все призовые места годом ранее)…
✅ MACD - Как ПРАВИЛЬНО настроить индикатор 👆
⚡️Я собрал ВСЮ полезную информацию об MACD и уместил в удобный формат (10 минут на изучение). Когда нужен MACD? Когда его игнорировать? Что ставить рядом?
🔘Забирайте PDF-файл, также, смотрите последний ролик:
https://youtu.be/Pa6uTg1yGhI
https://youtu.be/Pa6uTg1yGhI
https://youtu.be/Pa6uTg1yGhI
_______
p.s. Читайте также про RSI
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
#Копилка: 1 неделя
«Периодически инвестируя в индексный фонд, ничего не смыслящий в рынке инвестор способен на самом деле обогнать большинство инвестиционных профессионалов» (с) Баффет
🔘Как оказалось, если в течение года (с августа 2025-го) вы покупали бы Nasdaq еженедельно на $100, то прибыль составила бы ~13% годовых, а если в течение двух лет ~20%.
🔘Это натолкнуло меня на мысль откладывать в «копилку» еженедель…
🗃ФОНДОВЫЙ РЫНОК: С чего начать?
🔘Подготовил подробную инструкцию для новичков в формате PDF (5 страниц): где покупать, как покупать и что покупать?
🔘Главная мысль: «Не являясь профессиональным инвестором не пытайтесь обогнать индекс». Nasdaq/SPX обогнать невероятно тяжело, если у вас нет опыта/времени и вы просто хотите вкладывать деньги под 20% годовых в долларах (средний показатель за 20 лет) - то индексы лучший …
✅ ~23% годовых в $ на фондовом рынке
❌ ~15% годовых в нац. валютах по вкладам в СНГ
🔘Среднегодовая инфляция (по официальным данным) сейчас составляет ~11%, но если измерять не по мин. потребительской корзине выходит выше!
🔘Как сохранить стоимость денег? Какие инструменты остаются рабочими? Есть ли что-то доступнее и ликвиднее недвижимости?
▶️Мировой фондовый рынок, самое простое - индексный фонд S&P-500, ежегодная…
🗃NVIDIA: из $3,600 в $7,680 (за три года)
🔘Сегодня утром мне стало интересно, а что было бы, если с августа 2023-го года по сегодняшний день ежемесячно я бы покупал акций NVDA на $100?
1️⃣ Обогнал бы среднюю инфляцию
2️⃣ Получил бы $4,080 прибыли
3️⃣ Бонусом дивидендами получил $10
• «Но ведь акций NVDA растут только последние несколько лет?»
• На графике я вижу десятилетний восходящий тренд, с коррекциями от 3 до…
👍11🔥5❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @NakbaevBTC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nakbaev 🇰🇿” (@NakbaevBTC), 6,567 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NakbaevBTC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.