Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ᜊ꒰ ´ ˘꒱ ੭ 𐌺᧐ⲙнᥲᴛκᥲ 𐋏ᥲны! ⻝

Channel

ᜊ꒰ ´ ˘꒱ ੭ 𐌺᧐ⲙнᥲᴛκᥲ 𐋏ᥲны! ⻝

@Nana_79103

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

99subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003524460508
TypeChannel
Username@Nana_79103
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Nana_79103

Growth

9210196.58 August 2026 — 92 subscribers9 August 2026 — 92 subscribers25 August 2026 — 100 subscribers31 August 2026 — 101 subscribers9 September 2026 — 99 subscribers998 August 20269 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 32 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 91–102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 08:5899-2
31 Aug 2026, 01:25101+1
25 Aug 2026, 02:07100+8
9 Aug 2026, 14:0192no change
8 Aug 2026, 16:4692first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

135 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51930711053545319004734.8%
custom 54070854344738430273223.7%
custom 51931237573586137512921.5%
custom 52337068646837996152720.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC19 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ⲏⲁⲕⲟⲏⲉц-ⲧⲟ ⲏⲁⲣυⲥⲟⲃⲁⲗⲁ ⲏⲟⲃⲩю ⲁⲃⲁⲧⲁⲣⲟⳡⲕⲩ ⲇⲗя ⲧⲅⲕ⤴️ #Арт #Ос #Маскот #Melody

custom 52337068646837996156custom 51931237573586137513custom 51930711053545319002custom 54070854344738430272

6 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC131 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ⲕⲟⲗⲗⲁⳝυⲕ ⲥ ⲗⲡⲱⳡⲕⲟύ, ⲕⲟⲏⲉⳡⲏⲟ ⲫⲟⲏ ⲭⲩύⲏя, ⲏⲟ ⳝⲩⲇⲉⲙ ⲥⳡυⲧⲁⲧь ⳡⲧⲟ ⲧⲁⲕ υ ⲇⲟⲗⲯⲏⲟ ⳝыⲧь🌟🌟 #Арт #Ос #Маскот #Melody

custom 51931237573586137516custom 51930711053545319003custom 52337068646837996153custom 54070854344738430271

31 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC175 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟📚📚📚🌟 #Арт 🌟

custom 51930711053545319009custom 51931237573586137514custom 52337068646837996153custom 54070854344738430272

26 Jul 2026, 12:50 UTC147 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ⲏⲁⲕⲟⲏⲉц ⲇⲣⲩⲅ ⲇⲟⲣυⲥⲟⲃⲁⲗ эⲧⲟⲧ ⲏⲉⲥⳡⲁⲥⲧⲏыύ ⲕⲟⲗⲗⲁⳝ, υ ⲧⲉⲡⲉⲣь я ⲙⲟⲅⲩ ⲉⲅⲟ ⲡⲟⲕⲁⳅⲁⲧь ⲃⲁⲙ🪦 #Ос #Louise #Коллаб

custom 52337068646837996158custom 51930711053545319003custom 51931237573586137513custom 54070854344738430272

22 Jul 2026, 17:35 UTC215 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Йⲟⲟ, я ⲩⲯⲉ ⲕⲁⲕ ⲇⲃⲁ ⲅⲟⲇⲁ ⲟⳝⳃⲁюⲥь ⲃ ⲣⲉⲁⲗⲉ ⲥ ⲡⲉⳡⲉⲏьⲕⲟύ, я ⲣⲁⲇⲁ эⲧⲟⲙⲩ, υ ⲏⲁⲣυⲥⲟⲃⲁⲗⲁ ⲥⲉⳝя ⲥ ⲏⲉύ, ⲥⲡⲣⲁⲃⲁ ⲟⲏⲁ, ⲁ ⲥⲗⲉⲃⲁ я🤩 #Арт

custom 54070854344738430279custom 51930711053545319003custom 51931237573586137513custom 52337068646837996152

20 Jul 2026, 19:42 UTC178 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 6/8 ⲙⲟυⲭ ⲡⲉⲣⲥⲟⲏⲁⲯⲉύ #Ос #Louise ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨

custom 519307110535453190010custom 51931237573586137514custom 52337068646837996152custom 54070854344738430271

15 Jul 2026, 20:07 UTC211 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

😀😀😀▪️ Ⲃⲁύⳝ ⲡⲣυⲥⲩⲧⲥⲧⲃⲩⲉⲧ ⲇⲁ ⲏⲉⲧ🤩 #Арт 🧛

custom 519307110535453190014custom 51931237573586137514custom 54070854344738430274custom 52337068646837996153

14 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC104 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @nanahishPhoto

#portfolioday

custom 54070854344738430276custom 51930711053545319001

14 Jul 2026, 14:56 UTC70 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @shzhivinciPhoto

♥️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️♥️ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩 VINCI VINCI VINCI🤩🤩🤩 #PortfolioDay 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩цель к нг 4к. 🤩 портфель с недоделками это конечно мощь. буду репостить всех, кто в ответ репостнет

custom 54070854344738430275custom 51930711053545319001

14 Jul 2026, 14:53 UTC68 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mitsu_drawsPhoto

Опааа, а у нас оказывается портфолио дэй наступил😋 Буду очень рада репостам💋 #PortfolioDay

custom 51931237573586137512custom 51930711053545319001

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Nana_79103. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᜊ꒰ ´ ˘꒱ ੭ 𐌺᧐ⲙнᥲᴛκᥲ 𐋏ᥲны! ⻝” (@Nana_79103), 99 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nana_79103.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.