14 Jul 2026, 02:07 UTC≈2,590 views140 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo
👇👇👇 https://www.instagram.com/reel/Das4gO5sYF1/?igsh=MWl0YWdrbzNidDFlaQ==
❤101😐18🤪6😁6🙈3👎2🕊2🤷♂2
Channel
Narges Kalbasi نرگس كلباسي
@NargesKalbasi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,377subscribers
-94 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001098670331 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NargesKalbasi |
| Created | 25 March 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NargesKalbasi |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 7,377 | -13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 7,390 | -8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 7,398 | -12 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 7,410 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 7,412 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 7,423 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 7,428 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 7,430 | -10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 7,440 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 7,442 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 7,449 | -14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 7,463 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 7,470 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 7,471 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 7,471 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 23 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2,192 reactions across 11 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,160 | 52.9% | |
| 👍 | 580 | 26.5% | |
| 👎 | 206 | 9.40% | |
| 👏 | 110 | 5.02% | |
| 🕊 | 35 | 1.60% | |
| 💔 | 25 | 1.14% | |
| 😐 | 18 | 0.821% | |
| 😍 | 11 | 0.502% | |
| 😘 | 10 | 0.456% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 0.365% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 0.274% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 0.274% | |
| 🤪 | 6 | 0.274% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 0.182% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 0.137% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2 | 0.091% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.046% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.046% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,192 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
14 Jul 2026, 01:47 UTC≈2,610 views342 reactionsread 28 August 2026
دنیا خیلی کوچک است و آدمهایی که شبیه هم فکر میکنند، بالاخره راهشان را به هم پیدا میکنند. پس نگران نباشید؛ دوباره همدیگر را پیدا خواهیم کرد. الان مشغول مهمترین کاری هستم که تا به حال در زندگیام داشتهام. من باور دارم که دنیا را دیوانههای واقعی اداره میکنند؛ بیشترشان مردانی هستند که در کودکی هرگز عشق واقعیِ مادرشان را تجربه نکردهاند. برای همین، حالا که مادرِ دو پسر هستم، بزرگترین مسئولیتم این است که تا جایی…
❤302🕊14😍11😘10👏4🫡1
14 Jul 2026, 01:47 UTC≈2,330 views149 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
❤136👍5👎4😢4
14 Jul 2026, 01:47 UTC≈2,390 views90 reactionsread 28 August 2026
The world is so small and people who think alike always find each other in the end. So don’t worry - we will find each other. Right now, I’m doing the most important job I’ve ever had. I believe that the world is run by absolute lunatics - mostly men who as children, were never loved by their mothers. So as the mother of two boys, my biggest responsibility now is to be as present and as loving as I possibly can. …
❤82👍6👎2
23 Jan 2026, 19:27 UTC≈6,930 views337 reactionsread 28 August 2026
این برآورد من بر اساس پیامهاییه که هر روز میخونم. من هم مثل بقیه، وقتی آمار رسمی و قابل اتکایی وجود نداره، به خوندن نظرهای شما تکیه میکنم. ۸۰۰ هزار نفر عدد کوچیکی نیست؛ این یک بخش قابلتوجه از جامعهست. دقیقاً به همین دلیله که در دنیا از «فوکوسگروه» استفاده میکنن. فوکوسگروهها قرار نیست آمار دقیق و عدد قطعی بدن؛ هدفشون اینه که حالوهوای فکری جامعه، الگوها و دمای افکار عمومی رو نشون بدن. معمولاً هم زمانی بهک…
👍138❤121👎34💔24👏9🙏7🕊4
23 Jan 2026, 18:40 UTC≈5,780 views240 reactionsread 28 August 2026
نباید اینقدر خشن و تهاجمی برخورد میکردند. باید میتونستند فرق بین کسی که واقعاً جاسوسه و کسی که فقط میخواد کمک کنه رو تشخیص بدن. اما اصلاً چنین تواناییای نداشتن. من شهروند بریتانیا بودم و تقریباً بدون شناختِ درست از من، من وارد کشور شدم و خیلی زود هم شناختهشده شدم پس میتونم بفهمم چرا به من شک کردند. اما حتی با این توضیح هم، نحوهی برخوردشون بههیچوجه قابل توجیه نبود. زندگی من رو خیلی، خیلی سخت کردند و در ن…
❤136👍56👎24👏20🕊3👌1
23 Jan 2026, 18:40 UTC≈4,040 views168 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo
نه، به هیچوجه. هیچکس، تحت هیچ شرایطی، حق نداره فقط بهخاطر اعتراض، جونِ آدمها رو بگیره. یه مثال میخوام بزنم. خیلیهاتون میدونید که وقتی ایران بودم، چند بار به اتهامِ جاسوسی بازجویی شدم. تجربهای بود تحقیرآمیز، ترسناک و کاملاً ناعادلانه. چون من هیچ کاری جز کمک به مردم انجام نداده بودم. تنها چیزی که میخواستم، این بود که کار خیریهام رو انجام بدم و کاری رو بکنم که عاشقش بودم. اما نه یک بار، نه دو بار، بلکه سه ب…
❤92👍41👎18👏12🕊3💔1🤗1
23 Jan 2026, 17:26 UTC≈3,480 views212 reactionsread 28 August 2026
همین اختلافِ نظرها و ناتوانی در پذیرفتنِ باورهای همدیگه، بهتنهایی خودش بهقدری سخت و فرساینده هست که فهمیدنش و کنار اومدن باهاش اصلا آسون نیست. اما ماجرا فقط به این ختم نمیشه. در کنارِ همهی اینها، یک فشارِ اضافه هم از بیرون داره بیوقفه اعمال میشه. فشارِ نیروهای خارجی. یک ماشینِ عظیمِ تبلیغاتی که شبانهروز در حال کار کردنه واقعیت اینه که عملاً کل دنیا علیه ایرانه. اگر ایران منابع نداشت، موقعیت استراتژیک نداش…
👍117❤45👎25👏19🕊3👌2🙏1
23 Jan 2026, 17:25 UTC≈2,800 views169 reactionsread 28 August 2026
الان هم آدمهای زیادی داخل ایران هستن که این تغییر رو میخوان و دارن جونشون رو به خطر میندازن. ولی درست مثل زمانِ شاه، این خواسته باید بشه خواستهی اکثریت. اگه واقعاً برامون ایران مهمه، باید بپذیریم که ایران یه کشور بزرگه با آدمهایی با باورهای کاملاً متفاوت. اینکه بعضیها توی فضای آنلاین صدای بلندتری دارن، به این معنی نیست که نمایندهی همه هستن. نه حامیان حکومت حق دارن از مخالفها انتظار داشته باشن باهاشون موافق…
👍93❤34👎24👏14🕊3👌1
23 Jan 2026, 17:25 UTC≈2,580 views169 reactionsread 28 August 2026
من هر روز پیامهاشون رو میخونم و واقعاً میتونم بگم قضیه نزدیک به ۵۰/۵۰ـه. اینجا توی پیجم حدود ۸۰۰ هزار نفر هستن و من این دوپارگی رو هر روز، واضح میبینم. قبلتر هم وقتی ایران کار میکردم، شغلم طوری بود که با آدمهایی از سراسر کشور در ارتباط بودم؛ از شهرهای مختلف، با نگاهها و باورهای متفاوت. اونجا هم دقیقاً همین رو میدیدم و میشنیدم. اون موقع هم ماجرا ۵۰/۵۰ بود. خیلیها هستن که آنلاین حمایتشون رو علنی نمیکنن،…
👍81👎37❤31👏16🕊3👌1
23 Jan 2026, 17:24 UTC≈2,450 views176 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo
وقتی این سؤالها پرسیده میشه، معمولاً یه پیشفرض پشتشه، اینکه همهی مردم ایران میخوان این حکومت بره. و واقعیت اینه که این فرض، درست نیست. چه شما خوشت بیاد، چه نیاد. چه من خوشم بیاد، چه نیاد. چه نفر بعدی خوشش بیاد، چه نیاد… این حقیقت رو عوض نمیکنه که این حکومت هنوز داخل ایران، طرفدارای زیادی داره. اینکه بعضیها حاضر نیستن این واقعیت رو قبول کنن، باعث نمیشه واقعیت عوض بشه. اونها هم هموطن ما هستن. اونها هم حق …
❤80👍43👎36👏16👌1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @NargesKalbasi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Narges Kalbasi نرگس كلباسي” (@NargesKalbasi), 7,377 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NargesKalbasi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.