#WeeklyNaseeha 🔵🔴 The Power of One Takbeer 3min read Muhammad As-Sameen (rahimahullah) was a sufi shaikh of Baghdad, from whom the great luminary, Junaid Baghdaadi (rahimahullah) had also benefitted. On one occasion, he joined the Muslim army to fight against the Romans. When the Roman army drew closer, the Muslims were overcome with fear due to the large army that stood before them.… Read more by Tapping the …

Channel
Naseeha Channel
@NaseehaChannel
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
246subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001013321070 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NaseehaChannel |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NaseehaChannel |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “☆ Naseeha Channel ☆” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 246 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 247 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 249 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 248 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 248 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 78.9% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 21.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2024 to 23 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#WeeklyNaseeha 🔵🔴 Don’t be a Ramdhaani! 3min read As the blessed month of Ramadhaan draws to a close, and the month of Shawwaal approaches, people eagerly anticipate the arrival of the day of ‘Eid. However, it is at this time that the challenge arises – the challenge of istiqaamah (steadfastness). Throughout the month of Ramadhaan, people exert themselves in ‘ibaadah, try their best to refrain from all sins, and…
🌹🌷🌷🌹 May the spirit of Ramadān stay in our hearts and illuminate our souls from within.
╔○══━┅┅┅┅┅━━─ RAMADAN MUBARAK TO THE MEMBERS OF NASEEHA CHANNEL! Beautiful typographic ramadan design by Qutub Qadri based on the following quote by Shaykh Abd Al Qadir Al Jilani (RA): "Ramadān consists of five letters, ra‘, meem, dhad, alif, noon. The ra‘ is derived from rahma (mercy), the meem from mujazat (recompense), mahabba (love) and minna (favour), the dhad from dhaman lilthawab (assurance of reward), the …
❤1
#WeeklyNaseeha 🔵🔴 Generosity ‘Competition’ 3min read During the golden ages of the Sahaabah (radhiyallahu ‘anhum), a remarkable incident took place. Three people had a discussion in the precincts of the Ka’bah as to who was the most generous man of the time. One of them argued that Sayyiduna ‘Abdullah bin Ja’far (radhiyallahu ‘anhuma) was the most charitable, the second one was of the opinion that Sayyiduna Qais …
❤2
#WeeklyNaseeha 🔵🔴 The First Martyr in Islam 3min read In the initial days of Islam, the disbelievers of Makkah Mukarramah inflicted untold torture on the few individuals who had accepted Islam, many of whom were slaves or freed slaves. Among them were Sayyiduna Bilaal, Sayyiduna Khabbaab, Sayyiduna Suhaib, Sayyiduna Zaid bin Haarithah, Sayyiduna ‘Aamir bin Fuhairah (radhiyallahu ‘anhum), and others. Although the …
#WeeklyNaseeha 🔵🔴 In Exchange for a Well in Jannah 3min read When the Sahaabah (radhiyallahu ‘anhum) migrated from Makkah Mukarramah to Madeenah Munawwarah, the water of Madeenah Munawwarah did not agree with them. However, one of the water sources from which the Muhaajireen (radhiyallahu ‘anhum) were able to drink comfortably was a well which belonged to a person from the tribe of Ghifaar. The name of the well w…
#WeeklyNaseeha 🔵🔴 Chain Reaction of Good 5min read Sayyiduna Luqmaan (‘alaihis salaam) was initially a slave. His master had once taken him to the marketplace to sell him. However, whenever anyone showed interest in purchasing him, Sayyiduna Luqmaan (‘alaihis salaam) first asked him, “What would you do with me? (i.e. what work would you make me do?)” The buyer would then explain his reason for purchase hearing wh…
#WeeklyNaseeha 🔵🔴 The Pious Porter 5min read A man once came to the gathering of the great saint, Ma’roof Karkhi (rahimahullah) and said, “Last night I witnessed something very strange.” When Ma’roof (rahimahullah) asked him for the details, he began relating the following extraordinary incident: The man explained that his family was desirous of eating fish. He therefore set out to the market, purchased a fish an…
❤2
🔵🔴 ‘Eid Sunan List
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1
#WeeklyNaseeha 🔵🔴 The ‘Dream’ of a King 5min read Sultaan Mahmood Begra (rahimahullah) ruled over Gujarat in India from the year 863 A.H till 919 A.H. During his rule, Gujarat witnessed a time of safety and prosperity. Furthermore, the different sciences of Islam, including the fields of tajweed and qiraat, were widespread and common in the province. Many illustrious ‘Ulama came to stay in Gujarat at that time. …
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NaseehaChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Naseeha Channel” (@NaseehaChannel), 246 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NaseehaChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.