Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for nasledie.muhammada

Channel

nasledie.muhammada

@NaslediyeMuhammada

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,818subscribers

-180 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001201714581
TypeChannel
Username@NaslediyeMuhammada
Created30 April 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NaslediyeMuhammada

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,8189,9989,9086 August 2026 — 9,998 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,998 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,995 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,982 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,970 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,955 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,942 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,922 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,902 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,895 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,880 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,866 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,854 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,837 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,818 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -180. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,791–10,025 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 19:599,818-19
13 Sept 2026, 13:179,837-17
9 Sept 2026, 14:199,854-12
4 Sept 2026, 04:569,866-14
1 Sept 2026, 01:469,880-15
29 Aug 2026, 06:289,895-7
26 Aug 2026, 10:249,902-20
23 Aug 2026, 06:249,922-20
19 Aug 2026, 10:359,942-13
16 Aug 2026, 20:539,955-15
13 Aug 2026, 05:349,970-12
10 Aug 2026, 00:549,982-13
7 Aug 2026, 01:209,995-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:169,998no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:009,998first reading

Engagement

298 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.46%
avg views ÷ 9,818 subscribers
Avg views / post
143
66 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
66
of 298 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 40 of 66 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held298 (4 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total9,450
Reactions total120
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3h 36m
Average length
1m 28s

Measured directly from 148 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

690 reactions across 210 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 530089484627635487824435.4%
custom 587322798468445389515722.8%
👍10515.2%
custom 54521306391574075698412.2%
💔233.33%
❤‍🔥182.61%
🤬162.32%
💯152.17%
😭111.59%
🔥50.725%
custom 520190093963979551330.435%
😢30.435%
👎20.29%
😨20.29%
💩10.145%
🙏10.145%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 211 of the 298 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 690 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 298 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC104 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🌍 Помощь Африке 💧 Чистая вода — это жизнь! Во многих уголках Африки люди ежедневно сталкиваются с острой жаждой. Для них чистая вода — не привычное благо, а большая редкость. 🌞 Дети идут километры под палящим солнцем, чтобы набрать воду из грязных луж и пересохших колодцев, где каждая капля на вес золота. 🛠 Колодцы — путь к жизни. Каждая новая скважина даёт деревне доступ к чистой воде, спасает от болезней и помог

28 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC108 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Шейха из Сирии Бадруддина аль-Хасани (ум. в 1935г.) спросили: Шейх, наступили ли времена, когда держащийся за свою религию будет подобен сжавшему (в руке) горящий уголек? На что он ответил: — Нет! Нет! Эти времена давно наступили и прошли. Сейчас настали времена, когда человек просыпается утром верующим, а ложится вечером уже неверующим, и ложится вечером верующим, а просыпается утром уже неверующим, и продает сво

💯2

28 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC106 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

نعم 👉Подпишись тут много пользы

28 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC104 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

На кадрах из алжирской провинции Джиджель — огонь совсем рядом с жилыми районами. На фоне пламени и дыма из мечетей раздаются такбиры: «Аллаху Акбар». В такие моменты особенно ясно понимаешь, насколько человек слаб перед стихией и насколько сильно его сердце нуждается в уповании на Аллаха. О Аллах, сделай этот огонь прохладой и безопасностью для жителей Алжира, защити их от всякого зла и бедствия. Пусть Аллах сохр

💔3

28 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC106 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

….❤️‍🩹 👉Подпишись тут много пользы

custom 53008948462763548783

28 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC103 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Невероятная история: как упавший дрон отправил бедняка из Ганы в Мекку Обычный житель трущоб в Гане случайно встретил съемочную группу National Geographic, когда рядом с ним упал их съемочный дрон. Возвращая аппаратуру журналистам, он пошутил с абсолютной искренностью: «А у вас есть дрон побольше, чтобы довезти меня до Мекки на Хадж?» Журналист выложил фото мужчины и его фразы в X (Twitter) — история мгновенно стал

custom 53008948462763548784custom 54521306391574075691

28 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC122 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🇵🇰🇰🇼 Пакистан и Кувейт подписали соглашение о военном сотрудничестве и совместной обороне 🤝 В Исламабаде главы оборонных ведомств Пакистана и Кувейта подписали масштабное соглашение о военном сотрудничестве, создающее общую рамку оперативной координации и обмена опытом между армиями двух государств. Канал Nasledie News освещает события на ближнем востоке, в исламском мире и во всем мире в целом.

28 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC132 viewsread 29 August 2026

Коран: «Пусть они прощают и извиняют. Разве вы не хотите, чтобы Аллах простил вас?» (Ан-Нур, 22) Прощать не слабость. Это сила того, кто надеется на прощение Аллаха. Кто закрывает глаза на чужой проступок, тому Аллах закрывает его собственные.

28 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC131 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🇱🇧 Вот так, в частности, выглядел район озера Бинт-Джубайль в Ливане до и после военных действий и оккупации. Больно видеть, как меняются места, где когда-то кипела жизнь. За разрушенными зданиями и пейзажами стоят судьбы людей, их дома, воспоминания и история. Пусть Аллах защитит мирных жителей и дарует Ливану и всему региону мир и безопасность. 🤲🇱🇧

💔4

28 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC130 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Посланник Аллаха ﷺ сказал: «Два слова, легких на языке, тяжелых на весах и любимых Милостивым: سُبْحَانَ اللَّهِ وَبِحَمْدِهِ، سُبْحَانَ اللَّهِ الْعَظِيمِ" Субхана-Ллахи ва би-хамдихи, субхана-Ллахи-ль-Азым"» (Пречист Аллах и хвала Ему, пречист Аллах Великий).

custom 53008948462763548784

28 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC140 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

НЕПАЛ: Спустя три недели после религиозных волнений, на некоторые части страны обрушились сильные наводнения. Три недели назад религиозные беспорядки на юге Непала, как сообщается, привели к поджогу копии Корана, а также атакам, которые повредили или разрушили мечеть. Согласно сообщениям, дома, предприятия и имущество, принадлежащие мусульманам, также подверглись нападениям или были сожжены. Что произошло три недели

Showing the 12 most recent of 298 posts we hold for @NaslediyeMuhammada. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@NaslediyeMuhammada edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Семья в Исламе🌸
@islamsemya · 26,239
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“nasledie.muhammada” (@NaslediyeMuhammada), 9,818 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NaslediyeMuhammada.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.