Улыбаемся и машем. Избавляемся от мусора. Накапливаем ресурс, нас ждут великие дела! 🌻
🔥155❤114👍38🥰3👏2

Channel
@NataliaKuper
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,300subscribers
-196 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001617951346 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NataliaKuper |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NataliaKuper |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:07 | 16,300 | +1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 14:08 | 16,299 | +2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:26 | 16,297 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:27 | 16,303 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:06 | 16,304 | +7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 16,297 | +2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:00 | 16,295 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:29 | 16,296 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:01 | 16,304 | -5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 16,309 | +4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:38 | 16,305 | +1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 16,304 | +2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:08 | 16,302 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:29 | 16,306 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:10 | 16,308 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:07 | 16,311 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 16,315 | +1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:20 | 16,314 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:18 | 16,317 | -3 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 16,320 | first reading |
111 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 111 (30 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 73,180 |
| Reactions total | 8,397 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 04:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 58 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
34,510 reactions across 110 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15,683 | 45.4% | |
| 🔥 | 11,057 | 32.0% | |
| 👍 | 4,215 | 12.2% | |
| 🥰 | 1,260 | 3.65% | |
| 😁 | 969 | 2.81% | |
| 👏 | 378 | 1.10% | |
| 🎉 | 314 | 0.91% | |
| 😱 | 285 | 0.826% | |
| 🤩 | 117 | 0.339% | |
| 😢 | 100 | 0.29% | |
| 🤯 | 68 | 0.197% | |
| 🤬 | 53 | 0.154% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 0.032% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 110 of the 111 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34,510 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (39.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Улыбаемся и машем. Избавляемся от мусора. Накапливаем ресурс, нас ждут великие дела! 🌻
🔥155❤114👍38🥰3👏2
Просили напомнить: «КЛИЕНТЫ ОКРУЖАЮТ»⠀ ⠀ Нам понадобится:⠀ Большой лист бумаги, карандаш или фломастер.⠀⠀ ⠀ Рисуем на бумаге большой круг. Вдоль⠀всего круга пишем «клиенты». Считаем до трёх и прыгаем в центр круга с криком: «Клиенты окружают! Поперло!»⠀ ⠀ Проверено - работает! ⠀ ⠀ Лист с кругом убираем. Он нам ещё может пригодится, когда наступит спад в клиентах, заказах и продажах.⠀ ⠀ Поперло!…
🔥224❤77👍38🥰4
Video, posted without a caption
🔥166❤82👍37🥰18👏2
‼️ВАЖНО‼️ 1 декабря снимается с сайта практикум «Обиды». Кто хотел приобрести, у вас есть время до 30 ноября. Кто уже приобрел- у вас всё остается. Доступ к материалам бессрочный, пройти можете в любое время. Практикум «Обиды» -это пошаговые алгоритмы чтобы справиться с любой обидой. Это НЕ значит понять, простить и полюбить. Это значит избавиться от яда, который отравляет вам жизнь годами. ВАМ! А не обидчику. Г…
🔥112❤76👍37🥰8
Сегодня праздник у девчат (опять😁). Закончился тренинг «Деньги+». С чем я себя еще вчера начала поздравлять). По итогу были, конечно, материальные плюшки. (Покупки, +2 оплаченных путешествия, мероприятия). Но я кайфанула от нематериальных. Получилось погрузиться в какие-то глубокие пласты, проработать важное. Через слезы, через физический расколбас… но трансформация случилась. И я знаю, что результаты не застав…
❤169🔥61👍34🥰19
Photo, posted without a caption
❤253🔥85👍49🥰13👏4
Моя дочка прекрасно готовит 😍
🔥317❤121👏75👍65🤩13🥰9🎉4
Ровно 7 лет назад, я открыла свой Закрытый Клуб. За эти 7 лет параллельно у меня было много классных проектов и ваши результаты говорят, что мне есть чем гордиться. Но вот сегодня я четко поняла, что самый мощный мой проект это Закрытый Клуб. Сегодня я могу без ложной скромности сказать- это достижение. И за ним стоит мой ежедневный труд, ответственность, постоянное развитие, слезы радости и грусти, отчаяние, гордо…
❤359🎉126🔥79🥰19🤩5👍4👏4
Video, posted without a caption
❤212🔥77🥰30👏8👍4
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥132👍41❤15🤩11👏1
Благодарю Наталью🙏 за этот ритуал, реально рабочий и помогает… у меня муж скептик, кредит был у него, я ему говорю: ну сделай, что ты потеряешь от этого?! Он для прикола сделал, ржал конечно… но прошел год и кредита нет больше… так что делайте, дальше обстоятельства сложится так как надо!!!🔥
🔥169👍62❤43👏4
Топовый Симорон от кредитов. «Гасим кредит в банке». - берем банку. Рвем и бросаем в нее копию кредитного договора. У меня кредитов нет, поэтому заменила не бумажку. Если вы не можете взять копию договора- так же заменяете, как я. - засыпаем содой. Кол-во не имеет значения. - гасим все обычным уксусом. - закрываем крышкой. - громко, четко, вслух говорим «Кредит погашен. Так и есть!» - оставляем на сутки. - эффе…
❤259🔥160👍64🥰6👏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 111 posts we hold for @NataliaKuper. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@NataliaKuper edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
‼️Прошу ответить тех, кто были или собираются на мой Курс про деньги. Как вам было бы удобнее?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Natalia_Kuper” (@NataliaKuper), 16,300 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NataliaKuper.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.