Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC

Channel

NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC

@NationalGeograaphic

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

487subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001329247696
TypeChannel
Username@NationalGeograaphic
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 19 September 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NationalGeograaphic

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

487502494.56 August 2026 — 502 subscribers6 August 2026 — 502 subscribers27 August 2026 — 497 subscribers2 September 2026 — 495 subscribers10 September 2026 — 491 subscribers19 September 2026 — 487 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 44 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 485–504 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 00:21487-4
10 Sept 2026, 09:58491-4
2 Sept 2026, 04:12495-2
27 Aug 2026, 04:15497-5
6 Aug 2026, 18:46502no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:58502first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 September 2019the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54272320222527641381100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2019 to 27 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NationalGeograaphic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 September 2019 to 27 August 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2024, 13:56 UTC≈1,100 views0 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Video

🦁👑یک نمای نزدیک از پادشاه جنگل👑🦁 🦁Closeup on the king 🦁 #animal #lion #nationalgeographic 🌐 @nationalgeograaphic

Signed Moein Abdi

23 Jun 2024, 13:45 UTC803 views1 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Video

🏠یکم از زیبایی های طبیعت ببینیم🏠 #عکاسی #فیلمبرداری #ادیت #عکاسی_طبیعت 🌐 @Nationalgeograaphic

custom 54272320222527641381

Signed Moein Abdi

22 Jun 2024, 23:37 UTC680 views0 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎 این عکس خارق العاده کاری از محمد اصلان، عکاس حرفه ای نشنال جئوگرافیک است.

Signed Moein Abdi

3 Sept 2020, 13:50 UTC≈2,820 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📸عکس روز نشنال جئوگرافیک 🔶️عکس روز نشنال جئوگرافیک به تصویری از یک زرافه در دریاچه ماسک در تانزانیا اختصاص دارد.

1 Aug 2020, 09:49 UTC≈2,820 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📸عکس روز نشنال جئوگرافیک؛ بهترین رفیق

18 May 2020, 16:51 UTC≈5,010 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📸عکس روز نشنال جئوگرافیک؛ غار یخی سیبری 🔶️عکس امروز نشنال جئوگرافیک، تصویری از توقف یک یخ نورد در کنار قندیل‌های بزرگ غار یخی سیبری واقع در دریاچه بایکال را نشان می‌دهد.

12 May 2020, 12:24 UTC≈4,700 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📸عکس روز نشنال جئوگرافیک؛ کعبه از نمای بالا 🔶️عکس روز نشنال جئوگرافیک تصویری از نمای بالا را که بر فراز شهر مکه است خانه ی کعبه را نشان می دهد

28 Apr 2020, 17:25 UTC≈4,900 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📸عکس روز نشنال جئوگرافیک 🔶️عکس روز نشنال جئوگرافیک به تصویری از یک زرافه در دریاچه ماسک در تانزانیا اختصاص دارد.

27 Apr 2020, 16:35 UTC≈4,930 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📸عکس روز نشنال جئوگرافی، صید صبحگاهی 🔶️به گزارش یادداشت سریع، عکس روز نشنال جئوگرافی به تصویری از صید روزانه زن ماهیگیری در تالاب کوآن سان ویتنام اختصاص یافته است.

18 Apr 2020, 17:03 UTC≈4,730 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📸عکس روز نشنال جئوگرافیک (آزاد و رها) 🔶️این اسبچه زیبای هایلند (highland pony) به تاخت در حال گذر از زمین برفی در منطقه روستایی هایلندز اسکاتلند است. اسبچه های هایلند بومی اسکاتلند هستند و موی ضخیم شان به آنها کمک می کند در سرمای سخت زمستان دوام بیاورند.

14 Apr 2020, 16:34 UTC≈4,960 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📸عکس روز نشنال جئوگرافیک، شکارچی و دریاچه 🔶️سوژه امروز نشنال جئوگرافیک یک شکارچی است که در مقابل یک دریاچه در نزدیکی مرز افغانستان برای شکار اردک‌های سیبری به انتظار نشسته است.

11 Apr 2020, 16:37 UTC≈4,530 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📸راه رفتن در میان ابرها عکس روز نشنال جئوگرافیک 🔶️در میان باغ های سنگاپور که در نزدیک خلیج این کشور قرار دارند؛ جنگلی از ابر، انواع و اقسام گیاهان را در بر گرفته است. بازدید کنندگان برای تماشای تمامی محیط داخلی باغ و همچنین کوه های مصنوعی آن، می توانند با استفاده از آسانسور ها به پله ها بروند و در میان ابر ها از منظره لذت ببرند. این عکس زیبا توسط عکاسی به نام واریسا ان ( Warisa N) به ثبت رسیده است.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NationalGeograaphic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ژست برتر عکاسی
@positionn · 69,297
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Fine Art
@moein_photographer · 26,003
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC” (@NationalGeograaphic), 487 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NationalGeograaphic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.