Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانال رسمی نود 90

Channel

کانال رسمی نود 90

@NavadTel90

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,841subscribers

-302 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001297474592
TypeChannel
Username@NavadTel90
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NavadTel90

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@NavadTel90/445155 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC@navad/2597917 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC0.972 minutes
@NavadTel90/445185 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 21:08 UTC@navad/2598187 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC0.963 minutes
@NavadTel90/445162 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC@navad/2597987 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC0.9672 seconds
@NavadTel90/445083 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC@navad/2597307 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC0.952 minutes
@navad/2598207 Aug 2026, 21:20 UTC@NavadTel90/445187 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 21:22 UTC0.912 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@navad5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.952 minutesthis entry (41)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 42 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @navad. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

15,84116,14315,9926 August 2026 — 16,143 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,143 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,122 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,110 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,091 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,074 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,062 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,058 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,045 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,034 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,014 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,006 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,994 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,978 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,969 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,948 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,924 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,913 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,902 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,892 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,880 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,867 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,856 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,841 subscribers6 August 202630 August 2026
24 measurements spanning 24 days, net -302. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,796–16,188 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 15:1615,841-15
29 Aug 2026, 14:3515,856-11
28 Aug 2026, 17:3415,867-13
27 Aug 2026, 14:3415,880-12
26 Aug 2026, 15:2415,892-10
25 Aug 2026, 18:1115,902-11
24 Aug 2026, 19:5315,913-11
23 Aug 2026, 06:4415,924-24
21 Aug 2026, 18:0515,948-21
20 Aug 2026, 16:2415,969-9
19 Aug 2026, 19:0215,978-16
18 Aug 2026, 17:2315,994-12
17 Aug 2026, 17:5716,006-8
16 Aug 2026, 14:0616,014-20
14 Aug 2026, 20:1316,034-11
13 Aug 2026, 13:3716,045-13
12 Aug 2026, 13:1316,058-4
11 Aug 2026, 15:5216,062-12
10 Aug 2026, 19:1316,074-17
9 Aug 2026, 17:0316,091first reading

Engagement

886 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.04%
avg views ÷ 15,841 subscribers
Avg views / post
323
886 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.632%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
886
of 886 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 295 of 886 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held886 (6 August 202630 August 2026)
Views total286,035
Reactions total772
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 04:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
252,000
Videos
42,500
Links
3,130

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 46m
Average length
1m 15s

Measured directly from 134 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

772 reactions across 271 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩28637.0%
26734.6%
👍7810.1%
👎354.53%
🔥263.37%
👏232.98%
🤣151.94%
😁141.81%
🍌81.04%
💔40.518%
🖕40.518%
👌20.259%
🤬20.259%
🥴20.259%
🍾10.13%
💋10.13%
😍10.13%
🤡10.13%
🤮10.13%
🥰10.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 295 of the 886 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 772reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 886 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC399 viewsread 31 August 2026

کانال بتمون ⬇️🔽⬇️🔽 @Mixbet_org @Mixbet_org ✅ @Mixbet_org @Mixbet_org ✅

30 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC342 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

👑رفقایی که دنبال چنل مطمئن و کار درست برای بت بودن میتونن تو چنلمون عضو بشن و از فرمای نابش استفاده کنن❤️ ➕تموم فرم ها رایگانه ، و با یه سرمایه کم میتونید ماهانه چند میلیون سود کنید وقتش نرسیده که از فوتبال دیدن پول در بیارید؟⚽️ 🆓عضویت رایگان در کانال 🔖@Mixbet_org @Mixbet_org 🔖@Mixbet_org @Mixbet_org

1

30 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC537 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

#غیررسمی| کوپال ناظمی به‌عنوان داور دیدار استقلال و پرسپولیس انتخاب شد ناظمی در هفته چهارم لیگ برتر قضاوتی نداشت و به همین دلیل با استراحت بیشتری نسبت به دیگر گزینه اصلی، موعود بنیادی‌ فر، وارد فرآیند انتخاب داور دربی شد در ابتدا نام پیام حیدری، موعود بنیادی‌ فر و کوپال ناظمی به‌عنوان گزینه‌های اصلی قضاوت دربی مطرح شده بود، اما عملکرد حیدری در هفته‌های اخیر باعث شد نام او از فهرست نهایی کنار گذاشته شود ⚽️Channel:

30 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC505 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

مورینیو: بلینگام باید در رقابت توپ طلا باشد؛ امروز آن پسری که شاید محبوب نباشد عالی بود سرمربی رئال مادرید، پس از پیروزی قاطع مقابل مالاگا گفت: آیا بلینگام باید در رقابت توپ طلا باشد؟ قطعاً. کیلیان در جام جهانی تاریخ‌سازی کرد، اما عملکرد جود به عنوان یک هافبک، واقعاً باورنکردنی است. بسیار مهم است که مردم لذت ببرند، اما دیدگاه فوتبالی در سطح بالا، یعنی لذت بردن از نیمه دوم بازی ما؛ تیمی که از نظر دفاعی کار تیمی کرد.

30 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC459 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

لاتزیو 1 - جنوا 0 | پیروزی لاتزیو با تک گل داویده فراتسی ⚽️Channel: @NavadTel90

30 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC455 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

موناکو 2 - مارسی 0 | پیروزی قاطع موناکو در شب دبل پاریس برونر ⚽️Channel: @NavadTel90

30 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC418 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

کالیاری 0 - اینتر 1 | تگ گل چالهان‌اوغلو برای پیروزی اینتر کافی بود. ⚽️Channel: @NavadTel90

30 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC410 views0 reactionsread 31 August 2026

منصوریان عراقی‌ها را تهدید کرد! منصوریان در واکنش به شکایت باشگاه نوروز اعلام کرد الطلبه در صورت ضایع شدن حقش سکوت نمی‌کند. نوروز مدعی شده دو بازیکن الطلبه با شماره پیراهن یکسان (۷۷) بازی کرده‌اند و شکایت کرده است. سرمربی الطلبه تأکید کرد در صورت نیاز موضوع را به AFC و دادگاه CAS می‌کشاند. ⚽️Channel: @NavadTel90

30 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC446 views0 reactionsread 31 August 2026

انتقاد رسانه عراقی از گل‌محمدی: یحیی روحش در ایران است! رسانه عراقی از یحیی گل‌محمدی انتقاد کرد و مدعی شد او از نظر ذهنی در ایران است. این رسانه پس از چهارمین تساوی پیاپی دهوک، از احتمال تماس سپاهان با گل‌محمدی خبر داد. همچنین مدعی شد این سرمربی ایرانی با مدیران باشگاه دهوک دچار اختلاف شده است. ⚽️Channel: @NavadTel90

30 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC415 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

لیگ لهستان | برد لخ پوزنان در شب گلزنی اللهیار لیجف لوج 2 ـ لخ پوزنان 3 ⚽️Channel: @NavadTel90

30 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC508 views4 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

تصاویری از تمرین امروز استقلال ⚽️Channel: @NavadTel90

2💩2

30 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC500 views3 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

تصاویری از تمرین امروز پرسپولیس ⚽️Channel: @NavadTel90

2💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 886 posts we hold for @NavadTel90. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کانال ارتش سرخ پرسپولیس
@artshsorkh6 · 64,753
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
اخبار فوری/ مهم🔖
@havadese_fori · 63,324
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال رسمی نود 90” (@NavadTel90), 15,841 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NavadTel90.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.