Channel
@Nazanini_Eshq
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
189subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001574492621 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nazanini_Eshq |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nazanini_Eshq |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:56 | 189 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 188 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 191 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 190 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 190 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
سلاو دۆستان هەنی چەناڵی فول ئەکتیڤم بۆ هیناون بۆ فرۆشتەنە بە هەرزانترین نرخ چەنالم لە 1k لایە تا 100k بی فەیک وە گروپی شازیشم لایە لە 20k بۆ 100k بی فەیکنو هەموی زەمانی لەگەلە بۆکرین و فرۆشتنی پۆپجی جوانو راقی بەنرخی گونجاو بۆ کرینو فرۆشتنی تیک تۆک و ئینستا گرام و سناپ چات چەنالت گەورە دەکەین بە نرخی گونجاو ئەندام بۆ چەناڵ و گروپ بەردەستە فەیک و بێ فەیک سپۆن سەری هەموو ئەپەکانمان لایە بەزەمانی بی فەیک و هەموی …
Signed 𓆩
ویستم شکانت بۆ چاک کەمۆ بەس تۆ شایەنی نی 💔
Signed 𓆩𝑆𝑂𝑁𝐴𓆪
لەکاڵی ئەوانا وەک قاحبە بکەوە .🙂🙂
❤3
Signed 𓆩𝑆𝑂𝑁𝐴𓆪
Posted without readable text
Signed 𓆩𝑆𝑂𝑁𝐴𓆪
Mrova droznakan dayama tawaw bart akanu jwent pi dadan ta rasty xoyan wn bkan bo away hamisha to tawan bar bi bas hech haqe lay xwa wn nabi
Signed .
To etr jankiky sarbarze dl sozt namawa 💔
Signed .
Warn
Signed bye
https://t.me/xwenawy?livestream=0bcf20d9c99f471677
Signed bye
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Deleted Account
Video, posted without a caption
Signed ︎𓆩𝑆𝑂𝑁𝐴𓆪
جۆین بکەن وەک جاران یەمەوە 🩷 @xwenawy @xwenawy @xwenawy
Signed ︎𓆩𝑆𝑂𝑁𝐴𓆪
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Nazanini_Eshq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Nazanini_Eshq named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نازەنینی،᷂ئیشق🤎ᰔᩚ.” (@Nazanini_Eshq), 189 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nazanini_Eshq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.