Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НЕ ПOВ, А РІЛ

Channel

НЕ ПOВ, А РІЛ

@NePovRil

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,991subscribers

-168 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001847840923
TypeChannel
Username@NePovRil
DescriptionРозповідаю про доросле життя простою мовою. Донат https://base.monobank.ua/BwxAzL3VnfqBHE 👉по рекламі - @Adm1ns777 допоможу і рекламні пости написати та дам гарні умови 🔥
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NePovRil

Growth

12,99113,17413,082.57 August 2026 — 13,159 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,159 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,174 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,167 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,162 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,151 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,158 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,157 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,156 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,155 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,132 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,120 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,121 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,110 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,106 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,100 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,085 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,070 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,063 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,060 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,058 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,052 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,040 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,033 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,015 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,991 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 26 days, net -168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,964–13,201 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 07:3612,991-24
1 Sept 2026, 10:3813,015-18
31 Aug 2026, 09:0613,033-7
30 Aug 2026, 10:5313,040-12
29 Aug 2026, 08:3413,052-6
28 Aug 2026, 07:3813,058-2
27 Aug 2026, 10:5513,060-3
26 Aug 2026, 07:4313,063-7
25 Aug 2026, 05:4713,070-15
24 Aug 2026, 05:0313,085-15
22 Aug 2026, 09:3613,100-6
21 Aug 2026, 01:3213,106-4
19 Aug 2026, 23:0813,110-11
18 Aug 2026, 21:0713,121+1
17 Aug 2026, 19:4513,120-12
16 Aug 2026, 16:1513,132-23
15 Aug 2026, 02:2213,155-1
13 Aug 2026, 18:0713,156-1
12 Aug 2026, 18:3313,157-1
11 Aug 2026, 18:0613,158first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.39%
avg views ÷ 12,991 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,220
61 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
61
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 57 of 61 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held63 (25 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total74,416
Reactions total837
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 08:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,180
Videos
11
Links
379

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

874 reactions across 57 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19722.5%
😁17419.9%
🤡11913.6%
👎10311.8%
🐳475.38%
custom 5456508774200133687374.23%
💅262.97%
🤩262.97%
🤷202.29%
🤷‍♀171.95%
💘121.37%
😢121.37%
🍓111.26%
🖕111.26%
🥰111.26%
💩70.801%
😭70.801%
❤‍🔥50.572%
🤝50.572%
💊30.343%
12 further kinds242.75%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 874 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 05:28 UTC394 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

❗🔥Вийшла нова найпотужніша модель від компанії Anthropic (Fable 5.1) Ось тести що покращилося 👇✌️ 1. Феноменальний прорив у науці - На надскладному бенчмарку від Стенфорда (де зібрано реальні робочі процеси вчених у фізиці, хімії та біології) 🤯 Fable 5.1 набрав 52.6%. ⭐ попередній Fable 5 24.7% ⭐Opus 5 29.0% ⭐GPT-5.6 Sol 22.4%. ✅Також покращили кешування, зробивши його на 75% дешевше, тому тепер довгі сес

5🤡1

31 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC911 views29 reactionsread 2 September 2026

а я вже 2 раз першого вересня не йду ні в школу ні в унік ні ще кудись, аж незручно

🤩254

31 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC908 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026

ладно, тоді ставте рекорд по емодзі, що поробиш )

🤡25

31 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC911 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁6❤‍🔥1😭1

31 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC844 views78 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @frolova_otvechaetPhoto

✨ А ты когда-нибудь чувствовала, что жизнь пытается тебе что-то сказать? Иногда повторяющиеся числа, странные совпадения, сны, внутренние ощущения и встречи с определёнными людьми — не просто случайности. 🌙 В этом канале мы исследуем эзотерику, интуицию, энергию, символы, отношения и те тонкие вещи, которые обычно остаются за пределами повседневной жизни. Без скучной теории — только то, что действительно хочется по

🤡70🖕6😭2

31 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC930 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😁 Знаєте, щось, я не бачив таких новин від Claude А chatGPT , будь ласка 💘 Універсальна модель І доводе до самогубства І зпіздить щось І намагатиметься зїбатися Крч, користуйтеся норм нейронками

😁14🍓4🤡2🐳1

30 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC≈1,160 views51 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

ахуй, я про це тільки що дізнався....

😁39🥰5🐳3🙉3custom 54565087742001336871

30 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC≈1,210 views33 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Кароче, я сидів писав придумував ось ці пости типу: тебе любить тисни та вибери улюблений найкращий сердечко щоб дізнатися чи любить він тебе (ні) (Так всі ці пости я сам придумую😅🤤) І хотів знайти стікери вагітної жінки а його не має 😁🤕 Є тільки вагітний чоловік, підійде? Та ладно насправді це я не такий прошарений та толерантний ✌️🎈

😁23💘6🐳31

29 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC≈1,440 views53 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

сіксс севен дякаую за увагу

41🍓6🤡4💋2

27 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,630 views33 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @taemnytsi_stolitPhoto

💻 Людина, в честь якої назвали штучний інтелект Клод Шеннон ━━━━━━━━━━ 1937 рік, Массачусетський технологічний. 21-річний студент показує: логіку «так», «ні», «і», «або» можна зібрати з електричних реле. Абстрактна математика раптом стає схемою, яку можна спаяти. ‼️Цю роботу згодом назвуть найважливішою магістерською дисертацією століття. На ній стоїть кожен процесор, який коли-небудь працював. 1948 рік він дові

26😭4🐳1💅1💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @NePovRil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@NePovRil edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTCAnonymous Poll411 voters

Як ви ставитеся до накрутки досвіду при влаштуванні на роботу?

  1. Позитивно29%
  2. Негативно20%
  3. Нейтрально64%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,591,361 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Діма 🇬🇧 НМТ англійська
@znohub_eng · 41,120
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
Крістіна 📈 НМТ математика
@znohub_math · 51,072
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
Катя 🇺🇦 НМТ українська
@znohub_ukr · 45,966
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Яніна ⏳ НМТ історія
@znohub_hist · 65,677
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
Вступ 2026⚡️Live
@vstup · 42,181
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Вступ.ОСВІТА.UA️⚡2026
@vstuposvita · 110,529
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
TURBO ZNO History | Ілля Літун | НМТ Історія України 2027
@turboznohistory · 39,632
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НЕ ПOВ, А РІЛ” (@NePovRil), 12,991 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NePovRil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.