Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net +148. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,081–3,279 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 04:17
3,254
-2
12 Sept 2026, 05:16
3,256
+16
7 Sept 2026, 13:17
3,240
+21
3 Sept 2026, 00:48
3,219
-10
31 Aug 2026, 06:04
3,229
+6
28 Aug 2026, 10:58
3,223
+1
25 Aug 2026, 19:27
3,222
+6
22 Aug 2026, 13:15
3,216
+24
19 Aug 2026, 09:48
3,192
+11
16 Aug 2026, 18:57
3,181
+5
13 Aug 2026, 16:26
3,176
+2
10 Aug 2026, 17:31
3,174
+70
7 Aug 2026, 09:50
3,104
-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:48
3,106
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 24s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,558 reactions across 21 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,157
74.3%
🥰
266
17.1%
👍
135
8.66%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,558 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
14.3%
3 of 21 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,720
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,640
over 18 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
CQH36pWzJqMkuqb6ez7Wrn5NG4wFQPwbBUZaiyxaGR4aej
3
2 July 2026
15 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Даже не знаю, что и сказать. Костя написал после группы, на тот момент на 90% я был уверен, что он окажется в команде после Мажора. В целом CH давно его звали во всех составах, но он оставался в Шоках. И ничего не предвещало беды, но мы выиграли Мажор. Тут честно в моменте до обсуждения с командой я на 90% был уверен, что мы оставим Антона, приводя какие-то аргументы у себя в голове. Но все же после довольно длительн…
Время расписать свои мысли пришло. Я думаю подробности и про каждый матч, и турнир вы уже видели у ребят, поэтому я уже буду не так многословен как они. Скажу, что я ужасно долго ждал эту победу и этот турнир просто чудо-чудесное. Раунд Раниса против шоков, то, что я каким-то образом начал настреливать, в финале вообще мы с Денисом которые шли на MVP сыграли в довольно большой минус, но нас закерили пацаны уже. Как б…
Через несколько дней будем выезжать на буткемп, постараемся максимально продуктивно поработать и набрать форму. Также хочу напомнить, что за оформление подписки MiXX Play Pro вы получаете 300G ежемесячно на свой баланс.
https://u.t2.ru/mixx_play_pro
Реклама ООО «Т2 Мобайл» ИНН 7743895280 erid: CQH36pWzJqMkuqb6ez7Wrn5NG4wFQPwbBUZaiyxaGR4aej
Подробный пост по группе, дисклеймер для не любящих много читать‼️
По игре с VW я в целом уже пост делал, мы столкнулись с теми же проблемами, что у нас и были. Мы чувствуем игру, мы по нашим ощущениям сильнее, но начинаем отдавать клатчи, ситуации в преимуществе, у нас замедляется темп особенно за Т, нас начинают сноуболить, уверенность былая пропадает, а противник который вроде должен был отлетать в салат начинает…
GG SHOKE, GG VW. Формат турнира распорядился, что выходят только 3 СНГ команды, поэтому разочарование ребят я понимаю, этот этап все равно не тот мажор, к которому все привыкли.
Бля я даже на стертом экране в кд вышел, я хз че со мной эти 3 игры, но я нормис
❤49👍9🥰8
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Nekr0official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
L1berty @L1bertyNewEra · 24,702 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026
mellonty @mellonty · 28,151 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 9 September 2026
SaiNts @officialSaiNts · 32,910 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
Virtus.pro Mobile @virtuspro_mobile · 23,574 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026
BEHOLDER 🇪🇬🛠 @beholderStandoff2 · 45,216 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 August 2026
EPIC STANDOFF 2 @epic_standoff2 · 27,802 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
GentlemaN @artyom_gentleman · 92,584 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 August 2026
aboven @abovenwav · 90,011 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 17 August 2026
h1mi team @h1micanal · 22,243 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 September 2026
Union | Standoff 2 @union_standoff2 · 25,439 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 September 2026
NAVI ТРЕНЕР @navimaga · 49,696 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
Standoff 2 @play_standoff2 · 1,720,127 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 August 2026
STKILL SQUAD @stkill_squad · 46,893 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
Virtus.pro @virtuspro · 25,506 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
Standoff 2 Esports @so2esp · 65,717 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nekr0” (@Nekr0official), 3,254 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nekr0official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.