Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NetBold | نت بولد

Channel

NetBold | نت بولد

@NetBold

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

619subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001235319953
TypeChannel
Username@NetBold
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NetBold

Growth

619626622.51 September 2026 — 626 subscribers1 September 2026 — 626 subscribers11 September 2026 — 619 subscribers1 September 202611 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 10 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 618–627 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 08:01619-7
1 Sept 2026, 19:34626no change
1 Sept 2026, 07:16626first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 02s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

387 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣22357.6%
👍5714.7%
🔥4812.4%
custom 6046162128438563117287.24%
👎246.20%
😁61.55%
10.258%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 387 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2023 to 7 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Dec 2025, 08:06 UTC350 views8 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

TCP vs. UDP 🖥 NetBold

custom 60461621284385631178

6 Dec 2025, 11:30 UTC334 views11 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Linux File Systems 🖥 NetBold

custom 604616212843856311711

13 Sept 2025, 10:06 UTC528 views7 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Happy Programmers Day 🟥🎉 🖥 NetBold

custom 60461621284385631177

28 Dec 2023, 14:42 UTC≈4,940 views4 reactionsread 1 September 2026

🔗 لینک دانلود Copilot از گوگل پلی: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.microsoft.copilot

👍2custom 60461621284385631172

28 Dec 2023, 03:20 UTC≈4,200 views7 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🔥 اپلیکیشن Copilot به صورت مستقل توسط مایکروسافت عرضه شد و دیگه نیازی به نصب اپ بینگ برای استفاده از این هوش مصنوعی نیست. 🔵 همانند اپ بینگ، از این هوش مصنوعی میتونید سوالای مختلف بپرسید، با DALL-E 3 عکس و با پلاگین Suno اهنگ بسازید (به صورت کاملا رایگان و بدون فیلتر). 🔵 این اپ در حال حاضر فقط برای اندروید عرضه شده ولی در اینده برای iOS هم عرضه خواهد شد. 💻 @shah_code 💻

🔥6👎1

1 Oct 2023, 02:45 UTC≈3,560 views13 reactionsread 1 September 2026

🔵 یک نکته مهم و کاربردی راجب پرامپت نویسی در ChatGPT 👇 🔹 در پرامپت نویسی استفاده از کلماتی مثل «فقط» یا «دقیقا» یا «only» و معادل‌هاش میتونه اهمیت درخواست شمارو برسونه، مثلا وقتی سوالی میکنید میتونید در ادامه بگید برای جواب به سوال من «فقط از منابع ژاپنی استفاده کن»، این خیلی تفاوت داره با اینکه «از منابع ژاپنی استفاده کن» استفاده کلمه «فقط» یا هم‌معنی‌هاش در فارسی یا غیر فارسی یک مدل زبانی رو مجبور میکنه که کاملا

👍121

30 Aug 2023, 15:06 UTC≈4,680 views34 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

برنامه نویسا وقتی میخوان از ChatGPT و Stackoverflow کمک بگیرن🤣👌: 💻 @shah_code 💻

🤣29👍5

26 Aug 2023, 19:23 UTC≈3,390 views71 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

از این لحظه به بعد ChatGPT هم به جمع مسلمانان اضافه شد. 💻 @shah_code 💻

🤣68👍3

18 Aug 2023, 09:21 UTC≈2,930 views67 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

انتقام سخت از ChatGPT😂🤦🏾‍♂ 💻 @shah_code 💻

🤣67

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NetBold. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Jul 2023, 11:36 UTCAnonymous Poll514 voters

بنظرت هوش مصنوعی میتونه یکی از دلایل موفقیت برنامه نویس باشه؟

  1. بله78%
  2. خیر22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2023 to 7 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto Insights Hub
@majale_digital · 37,394
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NetBold | نت بولد” (@NetBold), 619 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NetBold.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.