Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LabHub & ishare2 Updates ️

Channel

LabHub & ishare2 Updates ️

@NetLabHub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,352subscribers

+72 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001595578608
TypeChannel
Username@NetLabHub
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/NetLabHub

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,2756,3526,313.59 August 2026 — 6,280 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,281 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,275 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,278 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,282 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,292 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,290 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,293 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,297 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,300 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,298 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,303 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,308 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,334 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,352 subscribers9 August 20264 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 57 days, net +72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,263–6,364 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Oct 2026, 20:566,352+18
25 Sept 2026, 06:156,334+26
16 Sept 2026, 22:386,308+5
13 Sept 2026, 09:546,303+5
9 Sept 2026, 11:166,298-2
3 Sept 2026, 17:576,300+3
31 Aug 2026, 06:136,297+4
28 Aug 2026, 10:036,293+3
25 Aug 2026, 00:166,290-2
21 Aug 2026, 10:276,292+10
18 Aug 2026, 14:356,282+4
15 Aug 2026, 15:256,278+3
12 Aug 2026, 05:256,275-6
9 Aug 2026, 08:326,281+1
9 Aug 2026, 04:166,280first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

128 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7760.2%
👍3225.0%
🥰53.91%
👀32.34%
💯32.34%
😇32.34%
👏21.56%
⚡10.781%
🏆10.781%
👎10.781%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NetLabHub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 February 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 02:38 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 12 August 2026

Has anyone tried this? https://github.com/zenhosta/9drive It looks good although I might have to sort out load balancing but the S3 compatible API and admin console sound like just what we need to keep ishare2 working. Why did I learn about this project on Instagram of all places? lol Has anyone else ran into issues while using the alist mirror? (alist.labhub.eu.org) I'm aware that it's been slow for some users but…

9 Jun 2026, 21:37 UTC≈3,400 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Hey guys, if you're looking for something new to run your labs that isn't UNetLab-based but is definitely inspired by it, check out Nova VE, a project by a good friend from the networking community. It's fully open source and completely free of charge. Keep in mind that it's still in alpha and not yet feature-complete, so you can expect a few bugs here and there. For many of you, this might be a breath of fresh air…

❤15💯3👎1

6 May 2026, 16:06 UTC≈4,170 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

The alist mirror has proven to be quite reliable. It will soon become the main mirror: labhub.eu.org drive.labhub.eu.org will remain active but will keep having those quota issue problems it's known for. Apparently legacy.labhub.eu.org is still active too. The bash version of ishare2 will only support these two mirrors and a new ishare2 rewrite will become available for the alist mirror Have you faced any issues wi…

❤3

21 Apr 2026, 15:22 UTC≈4,940 views7 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

The alist mirror is load-balanced across nine mirrors. I had previously added only two. Please report any issues, as this might soon become our main mirror.

❤7

20 Mar 2026, 04:28 UTC≈6,130 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

I'm testing the load balancer feature of Alist. I will create new service accounts soon, it seems like the current ones are overused or broken. https://alist.labhub.eu.org/LabHub

❤9

14 Mar 2026, 15:47 UTC≈6,220 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

You will see a huge difference in the latest version of indexes following the massive amounts of images that were archived: https://github.com/ishare2-org/mirrors/releases/download/LabHub-Indexes-2.0.1/qemu.json

❤5

13 Mar 2026, 23:12 UTC≈5,660 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

LabHub should be back at 00:00 UTC (49 minutes from now). We'll see if I switch to the premium plan Update: it's back

❤14🥰1

10 Mar 2026, 01:22 UTC≈5,660 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

In preparation for the next multimirror future plans, old images will be archived. This is the list of currently archived images. Only the latest versions will be made available through ishare2 and LabHub. This list will be published and images requested might be moved back to main mirrors if deemed necessary. Most of them will stay archived.

👍14❤1

4 Mar 2026, 02:48 UTC≈5,410 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

I received new Shared Drives today and will start setting up more mirrors. However, be aware that LabHub might change in the way we used to distribute unlimited files without limits. This is not sustainable anymore, it was good while it lasted but the only way to keep this project somewhat alive is to make changes in how we distribute files. More details coming soon! (No. We won't start charging for mirrors.)

❤5👏2

24 Feb 2026, 13:43 UTC≈5,220 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

I've purposely not done this until we have more mirrors btw (A few more days)

👍4

22 Feb 2026, 21:28 UTC≈4,890 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

(disregard if you don't know what this is, it's meant for devs)

⚡1❤1

22 Feb 2026, 00:55 UTC≈4,640 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

I see people still saying ishare2 doesn't work, just a reminder that it's normal. I haven't added the new indexes yet.

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NetLabHub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Networking | Cisco I Huawei | CISSP | JNICA
@CCNA_CCNP_HUAWEI · 19,325
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 2 October 2026
Network Learning
@learningnets · 30,735
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LabHub & ishare2 Updates ️” (@NetLabHub), 6,352 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NetLabHub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.