Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Neues aus Innsmouth

Channel

Neues aus Innsmouth

@Neues_aus_Innsmouth

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001327461359
TypeChannel
Username@Neues_aus_Innsmouth
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 September 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Neues_aus_Innsmouth

Growth

1016135 September 2026 — 10 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16 subscribers5 September 20268 September 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–17 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 12:1516+6
5 Sept 2026, 13:2310first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1993.8%
avg views ÷ 16 subscribers
Avg views / post
319
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.022%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held20 (24 August 2026 – 4 September 2026)
Views total5,104
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 32s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 10:24 UTC≈4,560 views1 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Ich werde mich anschließend wieder wie eine Schallplatte mit Sprung fühlen, aber das Thema ist zu wichtig, um es unkommentiert zu lassen: Die wichtigste Person bei einer jeden Wahl, gleich auf welcher Ebene, ist die des Wahlleiters. In der Militärkolonie weiß und erfährt die Öffentlichkeit grundsätzlich nichts über diese zentralen Funktionäre. Landeswahlleiterin in Sachsen-Anhalt ist Frau Ministerialdirigentin Chr…

👍1

3 Sept 2026, 06:27 UTC10 viewsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @PolitischeBilderPhoto

🟢 ➡️ Im Kanal @PolitischeBilder gibt es mehr 😇 🟢

3 Sept 2026, 06:27 UTC53 viewsread 5 September 2026

Wieder ein Schmeckerle für Halboppositionelle und ihr Gefasel vom "Kontrollverlust". Wenn das Regime an hunderttausende per Haftbefehl gesuchte Nichtdeutsche Sozialhilfen auszahlt: Dann handelt es sich bei diesen Leuten (deren Aufenthaltsorte man offensichtlich genau kennt) nicht um Einwanderer im ökonomischen Sinne, sondern um Siedler bzw. Kolonisten, deren Verbleib in der Spät-BRD einen höchstrangigen Wert für da…

2 Sept 2026, 14:48 UTC49 viewsread 5 September 2026

⬇️ Herr Haintz fragt nach der Motivation der anderen Staaten und der "EU", sich am antirussischen Kesseltreiben zu beteiligen. Diese Motivation liegt offensichtlich in der Vorsprache und Befehlsausgabe seitens der angelsächsischen Zwingherren, ihrer Geheimdienst- und Logenstrukturen gegenüber den jeweiligen Politikern. Es gibt alles ein rundes Bild. Kontinentaleuropa soll unter den Bus geworfen werden, wie die Ange…

2 Sept 2026, 14:48 UTC7 viewsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @HaintzPhoto

Gleichschaltung von Regierungschefs, NATO und EU zum angeblichen Drohnenangriff auf den Flughafen in Leipzig, den man Moskau / Putin in die Schuhe schieben möchte Es stinkt nach einer PsyOp / False Flag, um einen Krieg mit Russland zu provozieren. Die Motivation unserer Regierung ist klar und solche Aktionen waren zu erwarten. Schließlich möchte man Ulrich Siegmund als Ministerpräsidenten von Sachsen-Anhalt verhind…

2 Sept 2026, 08:19 UTC52 viewsread 5 September 2026

Spekulative Überlegung: Es dürfte ein Zusammenhang bestehen zwischen dem jüngsten Besuch von CIA-Chef Ratcliffe in Moskau und dem jetzigen Eskalationstheater für Arme, das die Bundesregierung aufführt. Hanebüchen ist natürlich die Vorstellung, Ratcfliffe sei nach Rußland gereist, um die russische Führung zu "warnen" oder was an ähnlichem Unsinn durch die Regimepresse geisterte. Nein, da ist eine Abmachung getroffen…

2 Sept 2026, 08:19 UTC7 viewsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @EvaHermanOffiziellPhoto

. Riecht nach schwerer Eskalation ... ‼️👉🔥 Deutschland bringt Russen-Sabotage vor Nato-Rat "Nach dem versuchten Sprengstoffanschlag am Flughafen Leipzig/Halle verschärft die Bundesregierung den diplomatischen Kurs gegenüber Russland drastisch: ❗️ Deutschland wird den Vorfall vor das höchste permanente Gremium des Militärbündnisses bringen. Wie BILD exklusiv aus Regierungskreisen erfuhr, wird der deutsche Nat…

1 Sept 2026, 14:10 UTC56 viewsread 5 September 2026

Fast schon kurios: Die Umfragedaten gleichen sich ziemlich genau meiner Prognose vom 13.08. an.

1 Sept 2026, 14:10 UTC7 viewsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @kaiorakPhoto

INSA-Daten: Wie immer sehen die Zahlen eine Woche vor der Wahl plötzlich anders aus als in den Wochen zuvor – damit man nach der Wahl behaupten kann, die richtige Vorhersagen ständig geliefert zu haben.

31 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC59 viewsread 5 September 2026

Die Apfel-Ernte fällt wegen Frost und Hitze, aber auch aus natürlichen Gründen geringer aus. Die Klimasekte hat es weit gebracht. Frost und Hitze gelten nun offenbar, ganz summarisch, nicht mehr als natürliche Phänomene, sondern als menschengemachte Faktoren. Meldungen solcher Art wären vor nicht allzu langer Zeit bloß in Büttenreden oder Kabarettnummern denkbar gewesen. Und die Irren, die sich offenbar eine Art S…

29 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC12 viewsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @EvaHermanOffiziellPhoto

. ‼️👉 EILMELDUNG: "US-Geheimdienste berichten, Putin gehe nun davon aus, dass Amerika durch den Iran-Krieg zu geschwächt sei, um ihn aufzuhalten … Aus neuen geheimen Berichten geht hervor, dass der Kreml den sechsmonatigen Krieg als Gelegenheit sieht, gegen amerikanische Interessen und Verbündete in Europa zu eskalieren; diese Informationen lagen bereits vor, bevor Ratcliffe am Dienstag nach Moskau flog. ❗️Er w…

29 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC89 viewsread 5 September 2026

Ich hatte es schon vor einiger Zeit angemerkt: wenn die Landmächte Eurasiens geostrategisch rational handeln (und im übrigen nicht flächendeckend von Einflußagenten der Angelsachsen unterwandert sind), wäre vermutlich jetzt der ideale Zeitpunkt für einen Präventivschlag gegen das angelsächsische Imperium. Einer der wichtigsten Faktoren in dieser Gleichung sind die Atomwaffen. Gibt es sie nun oder nicht? Funktioniere…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Neues_aus_Innsmouth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Neues aus Innsmouth” (@Neues_aus_Innsmouth), 16 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Neues_aus_Innsmouth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.