Channel
@NeuroMind
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
108subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002351069048 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NeuroMind |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NeuroMind |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 108 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 110 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 119 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 134 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 134 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
124 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 33 | 26.6% | |
| custom 5470080737711502911 | 23 | 18.5% | |
| custom 5220069080798611448 | 18 | 14.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 8.87% | |
| custom 5469725977707814979 | 10 | 8.06% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 4.84% | |
| 🤗 | 6 | 4.84% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 2.42% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 2.42% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 1.61% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.61% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.61% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.61% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.806% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.806% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.806% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💋Всем прекрасного воскресного дня! 🍬Наша любимая воскресная рубрика #воскресныйПост 🫴Сегодня #тест Какой вы человек в отношении к другим людям, каким вас видят окружающие 🤌Посмотрите на картинку и зафиксируйте что первое увидели, а потом как всегда смотрите пояснение в комментариях! Поехали..... С любовью к вам, Июша🌺 Гид по Тестам и МАК #воскресныйпост@NeuroMind
✍2❤2custom 54697259777078149792🦄1custom 54700807377115029111
А ещё мне хочется поделиться очень ценной для меня обратной связью, которую я получила за это лето уже 3 раза, не сочтите за хвастовство Ия, я так ждала этой встречи. Ты не представляешь, я рисовала нейрографику несколько раз с другими, но только с тобой всё работает Согласитесь, это не только приятно слышать, но ещё это обозначает, что мой метод работает. Я ведь давно его применяю, только у меня раньше даже мысли н…
custom 52200690807986114486❤5custom 54697259777078149795
Video, posted without a caption
❤2custom 54700807377115029112
Video, posted without a caption
❤1custom 54700807377115029111
Video, posted without a caption
❤1custom 54700807377115029111
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2custom 54700807377115029111
Video, posted without a caption
❤3custom 54700807377115029111
Всем прекрасного дня! 💖 Вчера прошла такааая невероятная встреча, что послевкусие ее ощущается ещё сегодня! Пост Натали я вам передала поздним вечером, теперь поделюсь своими впечатлениями! ✨ Я в первую очередь хочу поблагодарить каждую участницу за то, что они пришли именно осознанно разобраться в причине, почему у них не получается впустить в свою жизнь "большие деньги" и понять, как преодолеть "финансовый потол…
❤4custom 52200690807986114481custom 54700807377115029111
Posted without readable text
❤3custom 54700807377115029113👍2custom 52200690807986114482
Как же приятно получать такие отзывы❤️❤️❤️ 🤩 Во вторник 4 августа в 13.31 состоится наш с Натали очередной НейроДевичник в Арт-студии! Осталось несколько мест, самое время успеть записаться❤️ Все подробности в прикрепленном посту С любовью, ваши Натали и Ия ♾ Отзывы - в комментариях к этой рубрике можно посмотреть все отзывы о моей деятельности ♾ NeuroMindИя ♾ НАВИГАЦИЯ ♾ ПОСТ-ГИД
❤3custom 52200690807986114483🤩2custom 54700807377115029112
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
🔥2😍2custom 54697259777078149792
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NeuroMind. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NeuroMindИЯ” (@NeuroMind), 108 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NeuroMind.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.