Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Никита Лаврецкий!!!

Channel

Никита Лаврецкий!!!

@NikitaLavretski

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,723subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001279650875
TypeChannel
Username@NikitaLavretski
Created18 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NikitaLavretski

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,7221,7311,726.56 August 2026 — 1,725 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,726 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,728 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,731 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,730 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,728 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,729 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,727 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,726 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,725 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,722 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,723 subscribers1,7236 August 202611 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 36 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,721–1,732 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 18:361,723+1
6 Sept 2026, 22:161,722-3
2 Sept 2026, 03:071,725-1
29 Aug 2026, 22:131,726-1
26 Aug 2026, 13:591,727-2
23 Aug 2026, 09:441,729+1
19 Aug 2026, 22:021,728-2
16 Aug 2026, 21:441,730-1
13 Aug 2026, 08:241,731+3
10 Aug 2026, 03:211,728+2
7 Aug 2026, 05:561,726+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:061,725first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

203 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12059.1%
😁3115.3%
🔥167.88%
👎83.94%
🫡62.96%
👍52.46%
💯52.46%
👏41.97%
☃31.48%
⚡10.493%
❤‍🔥10.493%
💊10.493%
😈10.493%
🤔10.493%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC254 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @afishadailyPhoto

Август приготовил нам сразу несколько фильмов, ради которых стоит выбраться в кино. Среди них: • «Большая арка» — немного смешная, немного грустная история о творческих муках и об амбициях скромного художника, который выиграл конкурс по проектированию монументальной арки в Париже. По всем признакам крайне интеллигентское кино — как в хорошем смысле, так и не очень. • «Демонолог» — не самый стандартный J-хоррор о ге…

❤2👍1

3 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC483 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"Секрет Мэдди" — пока что комедия года. А про первый за 20 лет фильм Томми Вайсо я, кажется, написал на русском первым. Неиронично большая честь! https://daily.afisha.ru/cinema/34167-5-novyh-komediy-dlya-prosmotra-doma-idiotka-sekret-meddi-i-vozvraschenie-tommi-vayso/

👍4🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC737 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

С удовольствием посмотрел нового "Человека-паука"! Так что не думайте, что я всегда слишком строг по отношению к новым частям любимых киносериалов, запущенных Сэмом Рейми. https://daily.afisha.ru/cinema/34030-chelovek-pauk-novyy-den-samyy-trushnyy-film-pro-pauka-so-vremen-trilogii-sema-reymi/

❤5

28 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC688 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

3. Говоря о провалах маркетологов, невозможно не вспомнить про "Дау" Ильи Хржановского. Теперь уже точно понятно, что это потенциально очень интересный, если не великий, кинопроект с самой катастрофической маркетинговой кампанией в истории. Как и корпорация "Марвел", Хржановский с соавторами полностью убили хайп и аппетит публики, выпустив тонну необязательного бонусного контента вперед главного фильма, — только Хржа…

❤16👎2

28 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC536 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

2. Когда писал про сходство "Одиссеи" с серией-рекапом, понял, что единственное, что могло бы меня заинтересовать в просмотре новых "Мстителей", — такая вот серия-рекап, выпущенная в кино. А что? В аниме-франшизах так часто бывает! Мне кажется, только единицы зрителей смотрели все (или хотя бы большинство) фильмов и сериалов "Марвел", вышедших между предыдущими и грядущими "Мстителями". Ставьте класс, если вам тоже х…

❤7👎1👏1

28 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC581 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Три хот-тейка недели. 1. Кристофер Нолан — главный режиссер эпохи брейнрота! Вам попадались рилзы, в которых нуднейший разговор каких-нибудь подкастеров-тугодумов очень ритмично нарезан с такими крутыми монтажными эффектами и напряженной музыкой на фоне, что невольно кажется, будто вот-вот мужчины с экрана раскроют вслух самые главные секреты жизни и вселенной? Примерно то же самое делает Нолан в своих фильмах при п…

❤16👎5💯5😁4👏3

26 Jul 2026, 19:10 UTC619 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Никогда бы не предсказал, что буду смотреть новый сериал Уилла Феррелла с бóльшим удовольствием, чем возвращение Ларри Дэвида. https://daily.afisha.ru/cinema/33498-krinzh-v-horoshem-smysle-ili-net-smotrim-novye-komediynye-shou-larri-devida-i-uilla-ferrella/

❤4

24 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC775 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Провел ревизию восьми работ Николаса Виндинга Рефна, снятых за последние десять лет. После чтения рецензий на его новую полнометражную картину могло показаться, что в перерыве между "Неоновым демоном" (2016) и "Ее личным адом" (2026) режиссер бил баклуши, хотя это, наоборот, зрители поленились (ну, судя по числу оценок в датабазах) смотреть его работы в необычных форматах. Зря, ведь среди них был минимум один шедевр!…

❤8🔥6😈1

22 Jul 2026, 16:21 UTC669 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @afishadailyPhoto

Сегодня живому классику Нового Голливуда Полу Шрейдеру исполнилось 80 лет. Чаще всего его представляют как сценариста «Таксиста» Скорсезе, но мы хотим исправить это недоразумение. Переходите по ссылке — там вы узнаете о пяти шедеврах, которые достойны считаться визитной карточкой Шрейдера. Среди них «Чуткий сон» с Уиллемом Дефо, «Тьма» с Николасом Кейджем, номинированная на сценарный «Оскар» драма «Дневник пастыря»…

❤11

17 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC906 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Доказываю на двух примерах, почему "10-часовой триллер" (ну или даже 7-часовой) — почти наверняка оксюморон. https://daily.afisha.ru/cinema/33230-v-cel-ili-v-moloko-vynosim-verdikt-serialam-trilleram-ot-apple-tv-laki-i-mys-straha/

☃3⚡1❤1❤‍🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC900 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

И чтобы не быть голословным, сразу расписал, в чем была гениальность лучших частей выдающейся франшизы. https://daily.afisha.ru/cinema/33107-esh-protiv-armii-rebutov-vse-chasti-zloveschih-mertvecov-ot-hudshey-k-luchshey/

❤3

13 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC814 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Новые "Зловещие мертвецы", к сожалению, самые бесполезные из всех, зато благодаря им я сформулировал 10 конкретных советов для будущих протеже Сэма Рейми о том, как не нужно снимать хорроры с дедайтами. https://daily.afisha.ru/cinema/33105-10-sovetov-o-tom-kak-ne-stoit-snimat-zloveschih-mertvecov-na-primere-pekla/

❤5🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @NikitaLavretski. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

СЕАНС
@seance_light · 24,055
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
КИНОТВ
@kinotv · 63,328
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Общим планом
@obschimplanom · 23,047
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Искусство кино
@kinoartru · 23,887
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Никита Лаврецкий!!!” (@NikitaLavretski), 1,723 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NikitaLavretski.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.