5 measurements spanning 31 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 156–166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 07:17
157
-5
30 Aug 2026, 19:55
162
-3
24 Aug 2026, 16:25
165
+1
8 Aug 2026, 16:31
164
no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:38
164
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 3 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
476 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
165
34.7%
❤🔥
97
20.4%
👍
83
17.4%
❤
76
16.0%
💯
36
7.56%
🐳
19
3.99%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 476 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2024 to 21 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
36
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 15 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NineCandlesStickers. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 October 2024 to 21 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔔 Обновления стикерпаков
Мы продолжаем добавлять новые проекты и улучшать наши стикерпаки, для вашего удобства
🔎 Что изменилось с последнего поста об апдейтах?
👌 Новые проекты и обновления в стикерпаках TON:
Добавили в TON-пак новые токены:
1. DDOG - от создателя FWT
2. MIC - проект, создающий мерчи с уникальными механиками пошива
3. ONLYX - 18+ токен с контентом для взрослых и моделями OnlyFans
4. SC - стремительн…
🔔 Обновления и выход на Solana
Мы продолжаем масштабироваться и улучшать наши инструменты, для удобства наших пользователей. Сегодня мы расскажем о последних обновлениях:
✅ Новый стикерпак для Solana
Мы запустили новый стикерпак с токенами для блокчейна Solana!
На текущий момент, для вашего удобства, в него входят базовые и значимые для крипто-сообщества токены, такие как: SOL, BTC и ETH, а также ряд самых популярны…
🔔 Скоро Новый 2025 год, друзья!
Этот год был насыщенным, сложным, но таким незабываемым. Мы рады, что смогли пройти его вместе с вами. Каждый человек, каждый проект, с которым мы столкнулись за этот год, подарил нам что-то своё: от бесценного опыта и хороших профитов до ярких эмоций и новых идей.
🧭 Мы хотим сказать спасибо всем, кто был рядом, поддерживал, вдохновлял и помогал нам становиться лучше. Благодаря вам м…
🔔 Наши планы и мысли: куда мы движемся дальше
Изначально наши стикеры создавались как инструмент для более близкого «знакомства» с экосистемой TON. Благодаря этому решению мы познакомились с десятками проектов, фаундеров и команд на блокчейне TON, а уже совсем скоро их число перевалит за сотню. Эти знакомства не только обогатили наш опыт, но и помогли нам понять, каким должен быть современный инструмент для криптосо…
🔔 Динамические криптостикеры на блокчейне TON — удобство для комьюнити и мощный инструмент для фаундеров.
Благодаря нашим новым друзьям, попасть к нам в стикерпак стало еще проще и дешевле !
🔎Акционные условия листинга:
При оплате в токенах $BOLGUR — скидка 20%!
Акция действует до конца 2024 года.
NineCandles: Crypto World in Your Telegram
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @NineCandlesStickers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@NineCandlesStickers named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@busydevchannel named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“9C Stickers” (@NineCandlesStickers), 157 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NineCandlesStickers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
