Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Anonymous Calls 🐳

Channel

Anonymous Calls 🐳

@NoLimitcall

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

12,660subscribers

+271 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003549314919
TypeChannel
Username@NoLimitcall
DescriptionCrypto Anonymous | 10+ years experience in crypto trading agency & call group with no upfront payment | % No fee | NFA
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 6 March 2026 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NoLimitcall

Growth

12,38912,86112,6257 August 2026 β€” 12,389 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 12,389 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 12,704 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 12,806 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 12,848 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 12,725 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 12,861 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 12,789 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 12,709 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 12,581 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 12,525 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 12,599 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 12,712 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 12,702 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 12,638 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 12,778 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 12,710 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 12,718 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 12,695 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 12,657 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 12,633 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 12,628 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 12,730 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 12,691 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 12,660 subscribers12,6607 August 20262 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 25 days, net +271. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,318–12,932 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 06:0812,660-31
1 Sept 2026, 04:1512,691-39
31 Aug 2026, 04:0412,730+102
30 Aug 2026, 01:5612,628-5
28 Aug 2026, 22:4412,633-24
27 Aug 2026, 22:1312,657-38
26 Aug 2026, 20:4712,695-23
25 Aug 2026, 22:0512,718+8
24 Aug 2026, 21:2812,710-68
23 Aug 2026, 06:2612,778+140
21 Aug 2026, 18:2612,638-64
20 Aug 2026, 16:3912,702-10
19 Aug 2026, 18:0812,712+113
18 Aug 2026, 17:5212,599+74
17 Aug 2026, 20:1812,525-56
16 Aug 2026, 18:2712,581-128
15 Aug 2026, 07:1812,709-80
14 Aug 2026, 02:0712,789-72
12 Aug 2026, 16:4612,861+136
11 Aug 2026, 18:5312,725first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Links
13

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀11680.6%
πŸ‘Ž96.25%
🀣74.86%
😁53.47%
πŸ–•32.08%
πŸ‘21.39%
πŸ”₯10.694%
🀑10.694%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 06:46 UTCβ‰ˆ8,630 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Most people won't realize this until it's too late. This is why I’m still bearish on Bitcoin. BTC Hit Low 30K USDT ETH less then 1000 USDT Sol less then 40 USDT Bookmark this post . Not to brag, but I don’t have a single losing trade in the history of my X account. Not one. https://x.com/i/status/2034595421658779927

❀21😁4

22 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTCβ‰ˆ8,410 views28 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Are you ready ?

❀13🀣7πŸ‘Ž4πŸ–•3😁1

6 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTCviews β€”

Anonymous Calls 🐳 pinned «https://x.com/i/status/2074138050565935443»

6 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTCβ‰ˆ8,690 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2074138050565935443

❀4

6 Jun 2026, 14:43 UTCβ‰ˆ9,880 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Follow and re-tweet above post If you not following now regret later.

❀1

6 Jun 2026, 14:42 UTCβ‰ˆ9,170 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026

My target is incoming. https://x.com/i/status/2034595421658779927

❀1

8 May 2026, 13:42 UTCβ‰ˆ7,450 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Sell $Bitcoin #BTC From here Target 75k Let’s see if I am wrong for the first time in 8 months. Sooner or later we will find out. Are you agree with Me ?

❀8πŸ‘Ž5πŸ‘1πŸ”₯1🀑1

2 May 2026, 04:01 UTCβ‰ˆ5,340 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2050263910440419395

❀11

20 Apr 2026, 14:48 UTCβ‰ˆ6,320 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2046236208033141052

❀14

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NoLimitcall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 377,486 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œAnonymous Calls πŸ³β€ (@NoLimitcall), 12,660 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NoLimitcall.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.