3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 345–368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 23:40
365
+17
2 Sept 2026, 17:15
348
no change
2 Sept 2026, 17:01
348
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
65.7%
avg views ÷ 365 subscribers
Avg views / post
240
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
19 (31 July 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
719
Reactions total
50
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 17:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
237 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
49
20.7%
❤
43
18.1%
🤡
38
16.0%
👍
37
15.6%
❤🔥
29
12.2%
🔥
20
8.44%
💔
10
4.22%
😱
8
3.38%
🍓
2
0.844%
👌
1
0.422%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
+ من حافظه اسمیم در حد یک پیرمرد ۸۵ ساله یا حتی ماهی گلی هستش، روز رونمایی بگید من فلانی هستم من فقط میتونم سر تکون بدم وانمود کنم شناختم 😭😂 برای اینکه بشناسمتون لطفاً عکس پروفایلی چیزی یا نشونه و آدرس حرفهای بدین 😞😂
همه گوشیها همراهشون باشه روی پروفایلشون آماده من بیام بالا سرتون چک کنم، از روی رنگ اسمتون تشخیص بدم 😞😂 تا روز رونمایی هم دست به پروفایلها نزنین.
مرسی. اه.
سلام مجدد؛
چندنفر از شما بهم پیام دادین و توی کامنتها هم نوشتین که نمیتونین بنا به دلایلی به رونمایی بیایین اما دوست دارین یومی رو با امضاء روز رونمایی تهیه کنین.
گفتم این پست رو بذارم چون یکی از بچهها داوطلب شده که برای بقیه کتاب رو تهیه کنه روز رونمایی. (چه برای کسایی که با امضاء میخوان چه بیامضاء)
(احتمالاً شامل تخفیف خرید گروهی هم بشه.)
توی کامنتهای این پست میتونین با همدیگه هماهنگیهای لازم رو انجام بدی…
📣 نشر هوپا با همکاری کتاب اردیبهشت نسل برگزار میکند:
🖌️ رویداد رونمایی و جشن امضای کتاب «یومی و نقاش کابوسها» اثر برندون سندرسون
🔸باحضور امیر کسرا آرمان (مترجم كتاب)
🪨 بههمراه چینهچینی و کشیدن بامبو برای دفع كابوسها!
🕓 زمان: شنبه، ۱۴ شهریورماه، ساعت ۱۶
📍آدرس: تهران، فرشته، روبهروی آقابزرگی، پلاک ۷۰، ساختمان نسل، کتاب اردیبهشت نسل، طبقهی دیدگاه
💥 یومی از جهانی پر از زیبایی و باغها و ارواح میآید، و نقاش …
امیدوارم درک کنین من چقدر با خودم در مبارزه هستم که تا حد ممکن محتوای کانال رو مربوط به ترجمه نگه دارم. همهش احساس میکنم کسایی که این کانال رو دنبال میکنن علاقهای به حرفهای شخصی من ندارن و بیشتر میخوان دربارهی ترجمههام بدونن تا نظر شخصی من دربارهی چیزهای مختلف 😭
تازه اگر افسار رو بدم دست نورنغمهی درونم که اینجا میشه سیرک، دائم دلقکبازی 😭😂 خلاصه قابل شما رو نداره (بابت افسار کردن این نسخههای درونی)
ولی…
به نظرم یکی از ناپختهترین و نازیباترین انسانهای روی این کرهی خاکی، اونهایی هستن که یه حرفی دارن (حالا درست یا غلط) ولی جرئت زدنش به مخاطب مدنظرشون رو ندارن، بنابراین برای اینکه تمایل بیمارگونهشون در جلب حمایت، تشویق یا دیدهشدن رو سیراب کنن، به فضای مجازی رو میآرن؛ پست و استوری و فلان.
تا داستانشون رو یکجانبه و از دیدگاه خودشون تعریف کنن تا افراد ثالثِ از همهجا بیخبر ازشون حمایت کنن. در نهایت خود شخص هم با …
جالبتر اینجاست که انگار بقیه هم دارن سوالات کنکور رو به خارجیها نشون میدن و نظرشون رو میپرسن :)
مثلا این ویدیو:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcWFqmgBijs/?igsi=MXZodGVzbzZvOGxkbw==
انگار سوالات امسال حسابی سروصدا کرده :))
توی آزمون زبان کنکور امسال طراح اومده کلماتی رو بهکار برده که کاملاً لاتین هستن و ذرهای کاربرد ندارن برای انگلیسیزبانها و من داشتم با دوتا از دوستان انگلیسیزبانم (انگلیسی زبان مادریشونه) صحبت میکردم و اونها هم نشنیده بودن این کلمات رو.
نمیدونم اسمش رو واقعاً باید چی گذاشت، عقدهی طراح سوال برای دیده شدن؟ خودنمایی؟ خب باشه، فهمیدیم شما بلدی بری لغتهای عجیب از لاتین پیدا کنی، ۲۰ امتیاز برای گریفیندور 🤨👏
نمون…
آغاز فروش پکیج دورههای مترجم شو
اگر همین الان با شمارههای زیرنویس تماس بگیرین ۵۰ درصد تخفیف پکیج میگیرن (تعداد محدود) و در قرعهکشی یک خونهی ویلایی ۴۰۰ متری در زعفرانیه شرکت داده میشین.
این رو هم بگم که یک مترجم کاربلد و باسواد همیشه یه توجیه علمی و منطقی با منبع (منبعی غیر از «بهجون مادرم») برای کارش داره (مثل همین آقای رودی متی) ولی اگر از این دو ویژگی کاربلدی و سواد محروم باشه، درنهایت به «چون اینطوری باکلاستره» متوسل میشه.
پس اگر روزی مترجم شدین همیشه تحقیق کنین و با استناد به منابع واقعی استدلال کنین. لازم نیست حتماً کارهاتون رو توجیه کنین، ولی خودتون دلیل هر انتخابتون رو بدونین که اگر روزی…
در باب ترجمهی اسامی:
اخیراً داشتم دوتا کتاب میخوندم، یکی:
Angels Tapping at the Wine-shop's Door: A History of Alcohol in the Islamic World
و یکی:
Faces of Love: Hafez and the Poets of Shiraz
مترجم کتاب اول (Rudi Metthee) یکجا به انتخابش برای ترجمه اسامی اشاره میکنه.
رودی توی کتابش برای ترجمهی هراسمی یه قاعدهی خاص رو در پیش گرفته و نیومده کل اسامی رو با یه روش پیش ببره. مثلاً طبق یکی از قاعدههاش اومده یکسری…
👍13
Signed Karman
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Nocturnal_Scribbles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
manga @manga · 35,244 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اوصیکم بالترجمه” (@Nocturnal_Scribbles), 365 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nocturnal_Scribbles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.