Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Not Scary

Channel

Not Scary

@Notscary

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,104subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 1 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001393517921
TypeChannel
Username@Notscary
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 October 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Notscary

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

1,0731,1041,088.51 October 2026 — 1,073 subscribers1 October 2026 — 1,073 subscribers6 October 2026 — 1,077 subscribers12 October 2026 — 1,080 subscribers15 October 2026 — 1,084 subscribers27 October 2026 — 1,087 subscribers30 October 2026 — 1,097 subscribers2 November 2026 — 1,100 subscribers5 November 2026 — 1,104 subscribers1 October 20265 November 2026
9 measurements spanning 35 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,068–1,109 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 08:171,104+4
2 Nov 2026, 02:511,100+3
30 Oct 2026, 09:291,097+10
27 Oct 2026, 01:371,087+3
15 Oct 2026, 05:401,084+4
12 Oct 2026, 12:561,080+3
6 Oct 2026, 05:001,077+4
1 Oct 2026, 20:221,073no change
1 Oct 2026, 19:471,073first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

824 reactions across 19 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤22727.5%
🔥18222.1%
😱8810.7%
😁809.71%
👍789.47%
🥴334.00%
💯293.52%
🤣273.28%
🤔202.43%
🫡80.971%
👎70.85%
👏70.85%
🙏70.85%
❤‍🔥60.728%
🤮50.607%
🤯50.607%
💘40.485%
🤓30.364%
🤡30.364%
🍓20.243%
2 further kinds30.364%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 824 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTC452 views36 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Прерываю радиомолчание чтобы сказать, что мы дождались хорошего фильма* от Зака Креггера. Обитель зла – это по-хорошему глуповатый, динамичный и отлично снятый хоррор. Забавные моменты есть, отсылки тоже, монстры одновременно и оригинальные, и довольно близкие к тому, что в играх происходит. Как я уже говорил в видео про орудия, Креггер впечатляюще снимает хорроры и работает с самыми разными приемами страха, но вот…

🔥27❤7👍2

4 Sept 2026, 15:08 UTC850 views51 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Восемь лет назад вышел один из худших фильмов по крипипасте, с чего все на ютубе и началось

😱34🫡8❤7👍2

28 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC≈1,070 views45 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Добрый день, пока делается видео побольше, посмотрите видео поменьше, пожалуйста. Тем более я его еще с декабря прошлого года вам задолжал: https://youtu.be/7w6lq7uhzLk

❤40❤‍🔥3👍2

21 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC≈1,250 views42 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Сначала хотел расписать то, что в человеке пауке не работает буквально ничего, но фильм настолько не интересный, что даже поносить его не интересно. Зато вспомнил, что Сэди Синк, чья драма в пауке занимает последнюю 1/3 фильма, известна не только по Очень странным делам. А еще и по «Киту» – буквально одной из лучших драм за последние лет пять. Поэтому лучше лишний раз напомню об этом фильме тем, кто его пропустил. Е…

❤33❤‍🔥3👍3👏2💘1

20 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC992 views26 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Ну, это буквально самый скучный и вторичный релиз этого лета, извините Даже колобок… Позже подробнее напишу, но пока что просто meh

😁19👍6❤1

20 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC961 views30 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Про хорроры поговорили, теперь к важным новостям Сеанс на человека паука через сорок минут аншлаг пиздец огромный зал свободных мест нет

😁23🔥7

20 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC938 views26 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Есть два вида фильмов, игр и книг про искусственный интеллект. С вашего позволения назову их так: Хорошие раскрывают человека через ИИ. Отличные примеры: «Она» с Фениксом и серия «Я скоро вернусь» из Черного зеркала. Там через технологию показывают то, что человека никогда не заменит общение с роботом, и человечность не может подделать ни какой робот. Плохие, наоборот, пытаются сказать что у ИИ есть чувства и вообщ…

💯25🤔1

18 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC769 views48 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Ладно, давайте про говорящий хлеб. Наверное, ничего нового не скажу, но все равно: Если честно, положа руку на сердце – “Колобок” не настолько плох, как его ненавидят. Скажу ужасную вещь, но первая половина фильма даже местами забавная, а всратое лицо колобка выглядит органично и уместно, учитывая что он вырос в банде Куценко и катался лицом по земле все эти годы. Да и даже Журавлев, к которому у меня нет ни капли с…

👍36🤯5💯4🥴2❤1

17 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC819 views68 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Превью: Колобок хуйня ебаная Завтра подробности

😁38🤣23❤4👍3

17 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC842 views73 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Это не шутка, я иду на колобка

😱40❤12👎7🤣4🤓3🤡3👍2😭2

15 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC≈1,010 views51 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @RU66RUPhoto

🎬 «Посидите лет 10, подумайте и больше такого не предлагайте». Почему в России еще долго не будет хороших хорроров У фильмов ужасов новая волна популярности. Они начали собирать кассу блокбастеров про супергероев. Корреспондент @66.RU Дарья Александрович встретилась с видеоблогером, автором youtube-канала Not Scary и хоррор-фэном Иваном Некрасовым, чтобы поговорить о том, за что люди любят ужастики, почему у нас в с…

🔥35❤11👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Notscary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ИСТОРИИ ОТ ВОРОНА
@storiesfromthecrow · 19,539
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 October 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Not Scary” (@Notscary), 1,104 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Notscary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.