29 measurements spanning 29 days, net -147. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,557–26,748 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 17:57
26,579
-3
2 Sept 2026, 13:14
26,582
-1
1 Sept 2026, 13:28
26,583
-12
31 Aug 2026, 15:48
26,595
+4
30 Aug 2026, 18:55
26,591
-2
29 Aug 2026, 16:28
26,593
-2
28 Aug 2026, 19:07
26,595
-8
27 Aug 2026, 20:05
26,603
-11
26 Aug 2026, 19:44
26,614
-10
25 Aug 2026, 22:29
26,624
-13
24 Aug 2026, 20:32
26,637
+1
23 Aug 2026, 09:26
26,636
-11
21 Aug 2026, 19:08
26,647
-6
20 Aug 2026, 13:02
26,653
-7
19 Aug 2026, 14:22
26,660
-4
18 Aug 2026, 17:03
26,664
-12
17 Aug 2026, 16:25
26,676
-9
16 Aug 2026, 08:18
26,685
+8
14 Aug 2026, 18:55
26,677
-9
13 Aug 2026, 12:37
26,686
first reading
Engagement
475 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.77%
avg views ÷ 26,579 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
475 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.869%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
475
of 475 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 441 of 475 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
475 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
602,567
Reactions total
4,947
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 06m
Average length
58s
Measured directly from 69 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,797 reactions across 422 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
973
20.3%
🤣
851
17.7%
👍
715
14.9%
🤮
646
13.5%
👎
416
8.67%
🤬
404
8.42%
😢
281
5.86%
😱
139
2.90%
🔥
130
2.71%
🤯
80
1.67%
🤔
77
1.61%
💯
62
1.29%
😍
23
0.479%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 441 of the 475 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,947 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 475 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.68%
8 of 475 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
8
posts carrying an erid · 8 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,140
over 8 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,190
over 467 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFFyFkss
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
2W5zFGGg8Ro
1
27 August 2026
27 August 2026
2W5zFGjCVwX
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
2W5zFHnB4Yq
1
6 August 2026
6 August 2026
2W5zFHrQcBj
1
20 August 2026
20 August 2026
2W5zFJX9hWH
1
21 August 2026
21 August 2026
2W5zFJo85yj
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
2W5zFJstXJy
1
19 August 2026
19 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 475 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
❗️Нет такого сценария на сегодня, который потребовал бы мобилизации, — Путин
Слухи о мобилизации — информационная атака перед выборами в Госдуму. Президент отметил, что в России люди подписывают контракты добровольно.
Фото: Владимир Андреев | newizv.ru
Мы в Макс
⚡️ Путин на пленарной сессии ВЭФ рассказал о встрече с тигром в лесах Приморского края
«Идет прямо перед машиной, хвостиком машет, никуда не уходит. Хозяин тайги»
СВО не является определяющим фактором для демографической ситуации в стране, — Путин на ВЭФ
Президент отметил, что, к примеру, Япония и Южная Корея никаких военных операций не проводят, а уровень рождаемости там ниже, чем в России.
Мы в Макс
⚡Инфляция в России составляет 6,3% годовых, заявил Владимир Путин на пленарном заседании ВЭФ. Властям удалось замедлить рост цен, однако теперь важно «не переохладить экономику» слишком жёсткими мерами. Инвестиции в России снизились в первую очередь из-за политики Центробанка, нацеленной на подавление инфляции.
Дефицит бюджета есть, но угрозы для экономики он не создаёт, его нельзя назвать критичным. Задача властей…
ВСУ опять напали на Волгоградскую область
Этой ночью Россию атаковали 416 украинских дронов. Их сбили над территориями Брянской, Белгородской, Калужской, Тверской, Смоленской, Курской, Орловской, Тульской, Воронежской, Липецкой, Тамбовской, Ростовской, Волгоградской, Пензенской областей, Московского региона, Крыма и над акваторией Черного моря.
Мы в Макс
Дожди возвращаются в Волгоградскую область
Региональный ЦГМС обещает дожди уже 3 сентября, правда, только по области. Ветер составит 7-12 м/с. Днем будет +27…+31ºС.
4 сентября ветер сбавит обороты до 4-9 м/с. В ночь в Волгограде ожидается +16...18ºС, а днем +28…+30ºС и сухая погода. А вот по области прольются осадки с грозами. В темное время суток ожидается всего +7ºС, а днем до +30ºС.
5 сентября дожди пройдут и в…
Беспилотную опасность отменили в Волгограде
Она продлилась с 03:45 до 08:35.
Мы в Макс
Showing the 12 most recent of 475 posts we hold for @NovostiVLG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@NovostiVLG edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Жители Волгограда жалуются на проблемы со связью и мобильным интернетом. Как дела обстоят у вас?
Есть связь и мобильный интернет4%
Есть связь, мобильного интернета нет29%
Нет связи, есть мобильный интернет2%
Нет ни связи, ни мобильного интернета44%
Посмотреть результаты25%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 475 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
V1.RU | Новости Волгограда @newsv1 · 133,392 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
Волгоград | События | Подслушано @Volgograd_podslushal · 35,876 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Блокнот Волгоград @bIoknot_vlg · 87,985 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
Жесть Волгограда @ghestvolgograd · 103,534 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
Волгоград с огоньком @volgogradtop1 · 34,047 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 3 September 2026
Короче, Волгоград @vlgkoroche · 50,874 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 25 August 2026
Волгоград @vlgchp · 122,757 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 14 August 2026
Волгоград ВКУРСЕ! @volgograd34_vkurse · 69,678 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 20 August 2026
ЖВ | Жесть Волгограда @zhestvol · 36,921 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 September 2026
Сталингумрак @volgograd_tg · 45,460 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Новости Волгограда и Области @volgograd_smi · 76,716 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 19 August 2026
ВОЛГОГРАД СЕГОДНЯ @volgograds · 75,687 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026
МОСКВА LIVE 🔴 @moscow117 · 76,762 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Новости Волгограда” (@NovostiVLG), 26,579 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NovostiVLG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.