Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @𝐎𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐀

Channel

@𝐎𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐀

@OB3L1A

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002012188970
TypeChannel
Username@OB3L1A
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 10 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OB3L1A

Growth

2114 August 2026 — 21 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21 subscribers14 August 202616 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20–22 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 07:1921no change
14 Aug 2026, 18:0221first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 10 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

268 reactions across 9 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 57738827626079887863814.2%
custom 57940463627523890193211.9%
custom 57942051691681585743211.9%
custom 5776006928878538626217.84%
custom 5830471228770487969217.84%
217.84%
custom 5773897120683659320145.22%
custom 5794049394999299828134.85%
💘124.48%
💊114.10%
💋82.99%
🐳72.61%
🍓62.24%
🕊62.24%
custom 583010122163290548451.87%
❤‍🔥51.87%
👍51.87%
🎅31.12%
🥰31.12%
20.746%
2 further kinds31.12%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2024 to 11 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Apr 2024, 14:10 UTC490 views31 reactionsread 14 August 2026

➡️Жду везде по 5 реакций всех котиков и 2 полных ряда собственно!

custom 579420516916815857410custom 57760069288785386266custom 58304712287704879696custom 577389712068365932032❤‍🔥1custom 57738827626079887861custom 57940493949992998281

11 Apr 2024, 14:09 UTC493 views67 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

─┈ ( #𝐑𝐮𝐝 ) • 𝐍ew p𝐨st - @𝐎𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐀 ✦࣪ 𝐍.ame ⁝ pinterest « #арт · #pairedavas. ㅤㅤ℅ .. 𝐓ake? 𝐋eave «+» 𝐚nd 𝐫eaction!

custom 577388276260798878614custom 579420516916815857412custom 57940463627523890198custom 58304712287704879698custom 57738971206836593205custom 57760069288785386265custom 57940493949992998285🕊4

11 Apr 2024, 14:08 UTC471 views30 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

─┈ ( #𝐑𝐮𝐝 ) • 𝐍ew p𝐨st - @𝐎𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐀 ✦࣪ 𝐍.ame ⁝ как переманить мужа на свою сторону « #кпмнсс · #pairedavas. ㅤㅤ℅ .. 𝐓ake? 𝐋eave «+» 𝐚nd 𝐫eaction!

custom 57760069288785386267custom 57940463627523890197custom 57738827626079887865❤‍🔥2💘2custom 58304712287704879692🍓1🐳1

11 Apr 2024, 14:07 UTC377 views22 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

─┈ ( #𝐑𝐮𝐝 ) • 𝐍ew p𝐨st - @𝐎𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐀 ✦࣪ 𝐍.ame ⁝ как переманить мужа на свою сторону « #кпмнсс · #pairedavas. ㅤㅤ℅ .. 𝐓ake? 𝐋eave «+» 𝐚nd 𝐫eaction!

4custom 57738827626079887864custom 57940463627523890193🍓2🐳2💋2custom 58304712287704879692💊1

11 Apr 2024, 14:03 UTC339 views23 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

─┈ ( #𝐑𝐮𝐝 ) • 𝐍ew p𝐨st - @𝐎𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐀 ✦࣪ 𝐍.ame ⁝ как переманить мужа на свою сторону « #кпмнсс · #pairedavas. ㅤㅤ℅ .. 𝐓ake? 𝐋eave «+» 𝐚nd 𝐫eaction!

👍4custom 577388276260798878643💋3custom 57738971206836593202custom 57942051691681585742🍓1🐳1

11 Apr 2024, 14:00 UTC264 views23 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

─┈ ( #𝐑𝐮𝐝 ) • 𝐍ew p𝐨st - @𝐎𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐀 ✦࣪ 𝐍.ame ⁝ звездный свет « #зс · #pairedavas. ㅤㅤ℅ .. 𝐓ake? 𝐋eave «+» 𝐚nd 𝐫eaction!

💋3💘3🥰3custom 57738827626079887863custom 579404636275238901932custom 57942051691681585742🍓1

11 Apr 2024, 13:52 UTC287 views23 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

─┈ ( #𝐑𝐮𝐝 ) • 𝐍ew p𝐨st - @𝐎𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐀 ✦࣪ 𝐍.ame ⁝ звездный свет « #зс · #processing. ㅤㅤ℅ .. 𝐓ake? 𝐋eave «+» 𝐚nd 𝐫eaction!

custom 57940493949992998286custom 57942051691681585744custom 579404636275238901932🔥2🍓1🐳1💊1

10 Apr 2024, 19:09 UTC250 views23 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

─┈ ( #𝐑𝐮𝐝 ) • 𝐍ew p𝐨st - @𝐎𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐀 ✦࣪ 𝐍.ame ⁝ я так и не смогла усмирить эту злую натуру « #ятинсуэтн · #pairedavas. ㅤㅤ℅ .. 𝐓ake? 𝐋eave «+» 𝐚nd 𝐫eaction!

custom 579404636275238901943💊3custom 57738827626079887863custom 58304712287704879693custom 58301012216329054842🐳1👍1

10 Apr 2024, 19:05 UTC215 views26 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

─┈ ( #𝐑𝐮𝐝 ) • 𝐍ew p𝐨st - @𝐎𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐀 ✦࣪ 𝐍.ame ⁝ звездный свет « #зс · #color « 0/2 людям (10 руб/голос за канал/репост 6 друзьям наш вп-пост). ㅤㅤ℅ .. 𝐓ake? 𝐋eave «+» 𝐚nd 𝐫eaction!

5custom 57738827626079887864custom 57940463627523890194🎅32💊2custom 57760069288785386262👀1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @OB3L1A. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@𝐎𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐀” (@OB3L1A), 21 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OB3L1A.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.