temenan sini atau mau jadi partner imagine? t.me/LJenoljn #prince

Channel
πBLIVION'S πDGE πROMOTE
@OBLIVIONSPM
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
6,812subscribers
-191 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001398197311 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OBLIVIONSPM |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OBLIVIONSPM |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 6,812 | -27 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 6,839 | -20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 6,859 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 6,871 | -31 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 6,902 | -12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 6,914 | -30 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 6,944 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 6,943 | -28 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 6,971 | -26 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 6,997 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 7,003 | first reading |
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 0.595%
- avg views Γ· 6,812 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 40.5
- 33 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- β
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 33
- of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 67 (30 July 2026 β 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,338 |
| Reactions total | β |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 03:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Looking for new friends, or anything. maybe we can a cuddle? t.me/bysyir #prince
anyone up for dtalk? this dup wonbin also seeking for friends or anything, bxb as a sub. come to my roomchat, i wonβt bite. or come to my anon to have a dtalk if youβre shy t.me/jtoblutc #prince
looking for husband? or anything else? Just call me, i can do anything for u #prince t.me/M4rvenveric
sfs? rc. avail barter 5 account. t.me/rarives #edge
looking for husband? or anything else? Just call me, i can do anything for u #prince t.me/M4rvenveric
looking for wife? or something else? Just call me, i can do anything for u #prince t.me/M4rvenveric
anyone up for dtalk? this dup wonbin also seeking for boyfriend/fams, bxb as a sub. come to my roomchat, i wonβt bite. or come to my anon to have a dtalk if youβre shy t.me/kumcingimut #prince
saling subs ch? rc. avail barter 5 account t.me/rarives #edge
Hai saya Abi Saya need istri satu, selingkuhan, fwb, hts, apapun itu yg can pregnant, yg menye-menye, suka nolak, suka dikasarin, gembrot, like a extreme activity, boy and imagine only, tawari saya base promote. GHOSTING DNI T.me/Abimanyuarya #prince
Petek Alemdar #princess CW// NSFW ACC Hi there! I'm kinda lonely, so I'm looking for fwa/b, boyfriend, and anything. I love sending fpaps, playfully teasing my partner, and I'm very talkative. Here babee t.me/ladyrougee
ada nggak cowok yang mau nenen ke cowok toblut?? only ngobrol jorok no img/sexxting, atau chat anon. t.me/jtoblutc #prince
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @OBLIVIONSPM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@OBLIVIONSEDGE Β· 2883 postskeep
@slavepm Β· 333 postsγππ¬π ββιγ . SPΞCTRUM
@SPECTRUMSQ Β· 4,4163 postsMove @ALIANSI_NOIR
@ALIANSINOIR Β· 81 postBUBAR πππππ πππππππππ πππππππ
@ARSIP_DEATHWISH Β· 71 postπππππππππππ δΉπππππππ
@ELPHIMPPS Β· 81 postπππππ πππππππ
@MITRAGOURMET Β· 71 postmpps Bines
@mppsbinesyuk Β· 61 postEMPEPEES
@mppsdreamtown Β· 191 postππππππππππ°π ππππππ
@MPPSVASCAL Β· 101 postπΞ£β±€β¦Ξ£Ξ£β¦ π’ππ
@OFCVERNEEN Β· 1,2111 postPARTNERSHIPLS190
@PARTNERSHIPLS190 Β· 151 postREPSUGA PARTNERSHIP
@PS_REPSUGA Β· 71 postDESA JJKβs partnership.
@psdesajjk Β· 41 postDATA MPPS KINGH
@pskingh Β· 91 postRAVORS PARTNER
@TEMANRAVORS Β· 201 postVAD PARTNER
@VADpartner Β· 111 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπBLIVION'S πDGE πROMOTEβ (@OBLIVIONSPM), 6,812 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OBLIVIONSPM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.