Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𑂴 ֺ 𐌏ᥴᥱᥲᥒ ᧐f 𝑑𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑠‎ ֹ 🌊 𓈒𓈒 :: 𝘐𝘕𝘍𝘖

Channel

𑂴 ֺ 𐌏ᥴᥱᥲᥒ ᧐f 𝑑𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑠‎ ֹ 🌊 𓈒𓈒 :: 𝘐𝘕𝘍𝘖

@OCD_inf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

118subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003304020337
TypeChannel
Username@OCD_inf
Created21 January 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OCD_inf

Growth

118141129.58 August 2026 — 141 subscribers8 August 2026 — 141 subscribers16 August 2026 — 133 subscribers23 August 2026 — 126 subscribers30 August 2026 — 118 subscribers8 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 115–144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 23:25118-8
23 Aug 2026, 09:25126-7
16 Aug 2026, 07:06133-8
8 Aug 2026, 22:16141no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:06141first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 21 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5323730435769915117685.7%
custom 5327956687884163243114.3%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 15:16 UTC286 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ׅ ۫🤩 🤩et 𓆪 ִ ᜔ 🥹 🥹🥹🥹 OPEN | CLOSE 34/40 bot : @OCDD_bot complaint bot: @complaintOCD_bot

20 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC242 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩 . 🤩 🤩oles ໑ׄ 𓂃 занято - 🤩 бронь- 🐚 свободно - 🤩ther . . VIRTUAL SINGERS Miku -🤩 Kaito - 🤩 Len - 🤩 Rin - 🤩 Luka - 🤩 Meiko - 🤩 LEO/NEED Ichika-🤩 Saki-🤩 Honami -🤩 Shiho - 🤩 Leo/need miku -🤩 Leo/need kaito - Leo/need rin -🤩 Leo/need len - Leo/need luka - Leo/need meiko - More More Jump

custom 53237304357699151171

20 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC207 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

˒˒ ࣪ . ꒰ 🤩est 𖥔 🤩 ︵͟︵ ⠘ ⎾ ✦ ⏌ ⠘ ︵͟︵ 🔠eo/need rin - 8.08 - 22.08 🔠sukasa - 30.07 - 14.08 🔠hizuku - 02.08 - 15.08 🔠mu 8.08 - 12.08

custom 53237304357699151171

20 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC237 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ׁㅤ᪗ 🔠ules 🤩 🤍🤍🤍 перед вступлением надо прочитать правила ! не знание правил не освобождает вас от ответственности .

custom 53237304357699151171

20 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC207 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

࣪ ࡛ 🔠atent ݁ ׅ𓂃 🦷🦷🦷🦷 с 20.07 мы берем патент на следующие пункты : - оформление - название ‎ ‎𐔌 ‎ 🌊 𐌏ᥴᥱᥲᥒ ᧐f 𝑑𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑠‎ ‎ ‎𑂅 ׅ𓂃ׄ . - наши видео - наши инициалы - наши стикеры ! если наша администрация заметит что-то из перечисленного то мы будем в праве попросить вас убрать/поменять. если вы откажитесь мы будем в полном праве написать на вас ап !

custom 53237304357699151171

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @OCD_inf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 118,562 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

[NEW ERA]⺀𝜗𝒞𝗮𝗹𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼⁠ꫂ᭪𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗮𝜗𝒞༢ᶫᶦᶠᵉ
@alstroemeria_life · 110
1 post
unions 𝐴𝑒𝘓
@amesuni · 4
1 post
UNIONS / 𝐵𝑒𝓁𝓁𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓃𝓃𝒶 𝒻𝓁𝑜𝑜𝒹
@BELLADONNAUNION · 12
1 post
закрыт . 𝐋𝐈𝐅𝐄 ⋮⋮ ᭥ 愛 ׄ 𝐂𝔄𝐒𝐄 ﹙𝑂𝐅﹚ ℭ𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐑𝔄𝐒
@C0Clife · 37
1 post
𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 | 𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐏𝐄 𝐃𝐈𝐄𝐌
@CarpeDiemUnion · 9
1 post
𝔲𝔫𝔦𝔬𝔫𝔰 | . . 🖤 𝔇𝔲𝔰𝔱ℬℴ𝔯𝔫ℯ 𝔇𝔬𝔏𝔏ℌ𝔬𝔘𝔰ℯ.
@DD_unions · 3
1 post
𝐂𝐋𝐎𝐒𝐄𝐃 || ⏤͟͟͞͞ 𝐄ᴛᴇʀɴᴀʟ⃠𝐎ᴅʏssᴇʏ꙳
@ETOD_infoch · 98
1 post
𝐄vernight 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧
@FSBRunion · 6
1 post
⋅ ⋅ㅤ⎯ ㅤ𝖦𝖠𝖬𝖫𝖤ㅤ⎯ ㅤ 𝘜𝘕𝘐𝘖𝘕 𝘒𝘐𝘕𝘐𝘊𝘏
@GM_K1N1CH · 2
1 post
࿙݃࿙‌[𒄬]ᏀᎡᎪΝᎠᏴᏆͲᎬ࿐ˡⁱᶠᵉ
@grandbitelife · 314
1 post
𝐊𝐎𝐑𝐃𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐋 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒
@Kordhell_unions · 11
1 post
𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭
@Lelouchunion · 8
1 post
[𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐓] 𝐊𝐎𝐑𝐃𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐋 𝐇𝐔𝐁 𝟏𝟔+ 𝐋𝐈𝐅𝐄
@life_kordhell_hub · 174
1 post
𝑂𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑠.𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒.
@omimouslife · 96
1 post
𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗢𝗡:: ᯓ 𝘗𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵 「𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗠𝗘!」
@PerfectCrime_Unions · 5
1 post
𐌡ᥙᥴᴛ 𑀝᧐юᤋнᥙκ᧐ʙ
@SPsheet · 16
1 post
𝐓𝐁𝐎 𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬
@TBO_unions · 12
1 post
Союзы Скарикса 𝂅ׄ 𝅄ઽꪋ𝛾ꫝꪋ𝔱𝔢 ׁ⎯꯭𝆕 𝅘𝅥𝅮 ִֵ᳕۫ 𝅄
@Unions_Scarix · 1
1 post
𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍❜𝐒 𝐂𝒪ℭ
@UnionsC0C · 2
1 post
Полный список союзов
@unionslns · 6
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𑂴 ֺ 𐌏ᥴᥱᥲᥒ ᧐f 𝑑𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑠‎ ֹ 🌊 𓈒𓈒 :: 𝘐𝘕𝘍𝘖” (@OCD_inf), 118 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OCD_inf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.