![Telegram profile photo for [ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ก + ๐ข๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ ๐ ] โ ๐ฒ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ _ @PADJAOFC](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/f9/f9fdd262bb7da3180fd9c6de4321e36dbbfe5bbcc0f5288cc2743c9bb2afd5c2.jpg)
Channel
@OFCPADJA
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
2,173subscribers
+559 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003883855220 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OFCPADJA |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 24 July 2026 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OFCPADJA |
Other / unclassifiable โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:17 | 2,173 | -6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:39 | 2,179 | +16 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:19 | 2,163 | +1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:41 | 2,162 | +14 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:30 | 2,148 | -8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 2,156 | -4 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 2,160 | +12 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 2,148 | -1 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 14:39 | 2,149 | -5 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 04:59 | 2,154 | -1 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 2,155 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:55 | 2,160 | -10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 2,170 | +2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 2,168 | +4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:33 | 2,164 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 2,173 | +592 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 1,581 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 1,586 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 1,583 | -16 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 1,599 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
37 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โคโ๐ฅ | 37 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
bahkan masalah yang sudah selesai dan berlalu masih saja diungkit sampai detik ini. orang yang kalian cari pun sudah tidak ada lagi di sekitar kami, tapi yang terus dijadikan sasaran justru padja. satu orang yang berbuat salah, tapi dengan mudahnya kalian melampiaskan semuanya ke pihak yang sejak awal sudah mengambil tindakan dan memberikan konsekuensi yang seadil mungkin. kalau memang sebelumnya kalian punya persoalโฆ
โคโ๐ฅ15
Kalian nih pengangguran kah? Kok bisa ya ada tenaga buat ngurusin orang lain, padahal masalah udah clear dari lama, tapi masih aja di ungkit. Kenapa sih? Caper banget di liat liat, pengen banget di notice atau gimana?
โคโ๐ฅ5
lonte teriak lonte๐
โคโ๐ฅ3
kalau kalian memang punya masalah sama orangnya, ya selesaikan sama orangnya. tidak perlu setiap ada kesempatan nama padja ikut diseret. orang yang kalian bahas juga sudah dikeluarkan dari padja, jadi saya kurang paham kenapa yang terus disalahkan malah instansinya. jangan sampai karena benci sama satu orang, akhirnya semua yang pernah berkaitan sama dia ikut dijadikan sasaran. yang bikin heran, faktanya dari awal pโฆ
โคโ๐ฅ11
Sticker, posted without a caption
jangan nyampah di board,kalo mau mah langsung rc ownernya aja
walawe, iya nih bubarin donk nder, bingung ah harus gimana bubarinnya juga
waduu ngeri ah, sipaling ga bermasalah๐ kaca mau kaca? hey, permasalahan pribadi hingga rasa benci kalian ke anggota maupun ex anggota kami itu bukan tampungan kami, makanya main rp tuh sewajarnya rp aja nanti giliran posisi kalian yang berada diposisi ini malah memutar balikan fakta. jangan terlalu di anon-anonim kan sini rc/bot aja, padja dari awal sangat amat terbuka menerima kritsar
โคโ๐ฅ3
izin menambahkan sedikit,yang bermasalah di kerajaan kita juga sudah selesai dari pihak kita jadi sudah tidak ada sangkut pautnya dengan kita,dan dri pihak kitanya juga tidak membenarkan adanya incest,jadi tolong perbanyak literasi ya untuk kedepannya agar tidak di ungkit" lagi
saya disini sangat amat membuka lebar lebar roomchat saya bagi siapapun yang ingin mendiskusikan tentang hal ini, silahkan hubungi @libifdo jika ada yang perlu di bahas lagi.
hai nder, apakah faktor umur mempengaruhi indra penglihatanmu? jelas jelas disini ( https://t.me/OFCPADJA/2355) udah tertera loh ya klarifikasinya, sudah di jelaskan juga rincian masalahnya apa, saya juga sudah menyiapkan tempat khusus untuk anda memberikan informasi lebih lanjut ( https://t.me/spilldja/77 ), dan kami juga sudah membalas semua yang disampaikan melalui bot, saya tidak tau siapa yang datang menghampiriโฆ
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @OFCPADJA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ[ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ก + ๐ข๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ ๐ ] โ ๐ฒ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ _ @PADJAOFCโ (@OFCPADJA), 2,173 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OFCPADJA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.