Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel
Keep
@OFCSUGARWOMAN
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
—subscribers
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001816676879 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OFCSUGARWOMAN |
| Created | 12 January 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OFCSUGARWOMAN |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 12 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
@OFCBARBATOS
@OFCDEVIDOS
@OFCMAFIADARK
@OFCJAKERSQ
@STYGIANWORLD
@CALVARAZGANG
@CAVOSTRAGANK
@OFCDEVILLOSFAMS
@HELLRIDERSGANK
@OFCFOXASGANK
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @OFCSUGARWOMAN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@ARSIPMPPSADINASTRA · 11 postArsip Ps Atlas
@arsippsatlas · 31 postPARTNERSHIP BH 💓
@BABYHOMIEPS · 61 post𝗕𝗜𝗚 𝗕𝗢𝗦𝗦 Poster.
@BigbossPM_mv · 801 post𝐌𝐏𝐏𝐒 𝐃Ø𝐑𝐕𝐄𝐓Ø𝐑ˢᵠ
@dorvetorpatner · 11 post𝐌𝐏𝐏𝐒 𝐄𝐗𝐓
@EXTMPPS · 11 postPARTNERSHIP 𝐊𝐎𝐒𝐓 𝐁𝐔𝐉𝐀𝐍𝐆𝐀𝐍
@kostbujangg · 31 postKVROSE PS
@kvroseps · 11 postunsubs.
@lexiardplace · 481 postLIST PARTNERSHIP MADUVE
@maduvepartnership · 21 postPARTNERSHIP MKLINE
@MKLINEPARTNERSHIP · 51 postPARTNERSHIP KAISAR
@mpkaisar · 31 postMEDIA PARTNERSHIP RGKTH
@MPPSRGKTH · 11 postPS NARAMSIMHA
@NARAMSIMHAPS · 41 post99𝗪 OFC
@OFC99W · 141 postOFC BLACK GOLD EVENT ORGANIZER
@ofcbgeo · 21 postPARTNERSHIP THECON
@theconps · 31 postDO — RELATION
@TheRelationic · 11 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“Keep” (@OFCSUGARWOMAN). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OFCSUGARWOMAN.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.