Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
3 measurements spanning 76 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 81–82 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Oct 2026, 10:39
81
-1
9 Aug 2026, 18:02
82
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:31
82
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 29 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
95 reactions across 12 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
37
38.9%
🔥
28
29.5%
❤
5
5.26%
✍
4
4.21%
❤🔥
3
3.16%
😱
3
3.16%
🤔
3
3.16%
🤣
3
3.16%
🤬
3
3.16%
👎
2
2.11%
👀
1
1.05%
👏
1
1.05%
😍
1
1.05%
😨
1
1.05%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2024 to 3 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#добротаизабота
🐱 Кроху совершенно случайно обнаружили в подвале дома. Он был очень слаб. Мы отнесли его к ветеринару, пролечили, обработали от паразитов.
Сейчас это уже активный, хорошо кушающий, быстро развивающийся малыш!
Готов к поискам своего дома и верных хозяев
Котик (мальчик), примерный возраст 1,5 - 2 месяца. Аппетит отменный (кушает промышленный корм), ходит в лоток, очень много играет, он общительный и л…
❗️ Сегодня последний день приема замечаний и предложений по проекту планировки территории в границах ул. Дикопольцева - верхнего пруда парка Динамо". Иными словами, по спорному участку возле парка "Динамо".
✅ Я свои замечания подала!
Вы тоже можете направить до конца дня!
Как это сделать, написано здесь
❕ Завтра — последний шанс высказать своё мнение о застройке территории возле парка Динамо. Призываю прийти на публичные слушания всех, кому небезразлична судьба одного из лучших мест нашего города
🗓 20 августа (среда)
🕕 18:00
🏢 Актовый зал ДАСИЗа (ул. Дикопольцева, 17)
К сожалению, постоянные отключения электроэнергии — это проблема не только Берёзовки. С подобным сталкивается и Северный район: стоит пойти дождю, как мы опять оказываемся без света.
Предполагаю, что в связи с новыми стройками может увеличиваться нагрузка, и старое, изношенное оборудование попросту её не выдерживает. Ежегодно нам поднимают тарифы на коммунальные услуги, в том числе на электроснабжение, однако модерн…
🤔 Обнаружила, что Минюст предлагает принять закон о так называемой «адвокатской монополии». Сейчас представителем гражданина или организации в суде по гражданским и административным делам может быть любой юрист, по новому законопроекту же нанять своим представителем можно будет лишь адвоката.
😡 «Адвокатская монополия» — нововведение вредное и ненужное. Я часто обращаюсь в суды и нанимаю юристов, которые представляют…
📢❗️Дорогие друзья, важная информация, которая может повлиять на каждого из нас❗️
Мы столкнулись с тревожной ситуацией, касающейся Управляющей компании ООО "Лоза", которая, по многим признакам, на наш взгляд, является клоном компании "Единый город".
За переход в эту компанию появляются фиктивные протоколы собраний, которые по факту не проводились, а позже жители видят поддельными свои подписи в протоколах. Не проводя…
Вот и закончились выборы. 🎉
Следующие 5 лет с нами будут те, кого мы выбрали.
Хороший сделали выбор или «как обычно» - покажет время
Но этот пост для людей, которые выбрали меня и голосовали за меня: Вы самые добрые и отзывчивые люди на земле! Благодарю Вас за доверие!♥️ Эти качества Вы разглядели и во мне.
Мне жаль, что не удастся оправдать Ваше доверие в этот раз, но кто знает как будет в следующий?)
Пусть нико…
#нарайоне
🏚 Очень непросто спокойно относиться к жизни людей в бараках на улице Санаторной, в которых недавно я побывала
О своей жизни в бараках на ул.Санаторной поведали их жители
Подробнее здесь 👇
https://hab.mk.ru/social/2024/08/14/obratnaya-storona-khabarovska-zashla-v-starye-baraki-na-ulice-sanatornoy.html
#история моего района
🧐 А знаете ли вы, что у нас в Северном микрорайоне города есть несколько исторических и мистических зданий?
Одно из них - дачная усадьба Богдановых, которая расположилась на ул. Санаторная.
Соседствуя с детским санаторием, с территории здания открывается прекрасный вид на р. Амур 🌅
В 1893 году вместе с прилегающей территорией усадьбу приобрел купец 1-й гильдии, золотопромышленник и основател…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤣3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @OGNENNAYA_ML. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2024 to 3 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@OGNENNAYA_ML named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@vesti_dvtrk named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@grajdanka_ru named in 2 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Огненная🔥” (@OGNENNAYA_ML), 81 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OGNENNAYA_ML.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.