Why is Lenny Face not Running? This is so undervalued

Channel
OG’s Club | MAIN CHANNEL
@OGsCLUB_MAIN
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,154subscribers
-43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001988129845 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OGsCLUB_MAIN |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OGsCLUB_MAIN |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 1,154 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 1,156 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 1,158 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 1,166 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 1,167 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 1,170 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 1,176 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 1,181 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 1,185 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:59 | 1,190 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 1,196 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 1,196 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 1,197 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 36s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
0x85f20ba0fc7ee507becb90e0c86dcb4329e534f9
Time will tell
$LUNAR Aped here ..Good utility dev, created his own Robinhood wallet, will be on the app store in near future to..still a gamble for now so Dyor 0xcc36de56897ed47264b6260eea7d230d080c7b03 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x23f03dbf4466079e4cd98ed95d0f3a57705034967eb3a6650176e52c8b7b1f60 https://lunarwallet.app/
https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xd7d0AD5bdffc0aae6B6DA9c4de486Ae78b24A6B7
$1m mcap ATH
The SpaceX Ferret Buy! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ 💵 0.198 ETH ($379.25) 🪙 944 FERRET 🔷 0x1f1a…b540 | Txn ✅ New Holder 🔼 Market Cap $572,388 📊 Chart 🦄 Trade 🔹 Trending 🟢 Trending 🥇 @ETHTRENDING
Elon just gave us the perfect animal meta runner! Falcon NROL-95 mission is in 4 days and guess what animal emblem SpaceX added.. 👀 https://www.spacex.com/launches/nrol95 https://www.nro.gov/launches/launch-nrol-95/ https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x3C5E839dbC3987484aA73BDFE3eaD773f5AF15e4 The SpaceX Ferret
https://dexscreener.com/solana/4ZLkNox7uxazFvhjfeKU7i7VryWRTWpjJReLeqRuL6nF
JUST IN: Bitcoin reclaims $100,000 @WatcherGuru
Mame Inu Buy! 🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘 💵 0.078 ETH ($123.38) 🪙 2,378,149 MAME 🔷 0xc2d6…5d0f | Txn ✅ New Holder 🔼 Market Cap $52,816 📊 Chart 🦄 Trade 🔹 Trending 🟢 Trending 🥇 @ETHTRENDING
Mame Inu Buy! 🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘 💵 0.05 ETH ($77.92) 🪙 1,725,053 MAME 🔷 0xd515…1055 | Txn ✅ New Holder 🔼 Market Cap $45,680 📊 Chart 🦄 Trade 🔹 Trending
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OGsCLUB_MAIN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@OGsCLUB_MAIN named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 24 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OG’s Club | MAIN CHANNEL” (@OGsCLUB_MAIN), 1,154 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OGsCLUB_MAIN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.