Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OPIUM

Channel

OPIUM

@OP1UMWSLI

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

444subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003779954748
TypeChannel
Username@OP1UMWSLI
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 9 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OP1UMWSLI

Growth

444465454.56 August 2026 — 456 subscribers6 August 2026 — 456 subscribers13 August 2026 — 463 subscribers20 August 2026 — 449 subscribers28 August 2026 — 465 subscribers3 September 2026 — 459 subscribers12 September 2026 — 444 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 441–468 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 00:18444-15
3 Sept 2026, 10:58459-6
28 Aug 2026, 06:04465+16
20 Aug 2026, 22:19449-14
13 Aug 2026, 04:25463+7
6 Aug 2026, 19:04456no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:06456first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

136 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54452051633064101322316.9%
custom 52421907092886129441914.0%
custom 53482248404174415011914.0%
custom 58708288417227144061611.8%
custom 53481811391252038261511.0%
custom 5348360333750727947139.56%
custom 5348370156340933254128.82%
custom 534817454635040690985.88%
custom 534824324864727209932.21%
custom 544265942452092163232.21%
custom 534620909630131071121.47%
custom 544308620683119135721.47%
custom 534849929312262156410.735%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OP1UMWSLI. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 23:48 UTC25 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

мы в активном поиске админов. влд: Вестер. совлд: Матвей.

Signed cddx.

3 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC69 viewsread 6 August 2026

а еще у нас есть очень классный админ по нью дин.

Signed 🕸️

3 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC67 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @WHITELICYPhoto

⠀сапп, на связи Кэрол Юн. сегодня мы берем интервью у владельца конференции «OPIUM» ⠀приветствую, представьте себя и ваш чат. — меня зовут Вестер,я владелец кф «OPIUM». наша кф существует уже почти 6 месяцев,наша норма 40/250. с ботами 43 участника,а без них 30. ограничений по возрасту и персам нет. ⠀ ⠀расскажите, что отличает ваш чат от других? — думаю,в первую очередь-это атмосфера,у нас в чате достаточно дружелю

custom 52421907092886129441

Signed cddx.

30 Jul 2026, 06:27 UTC120 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

#OPIUM Editor: Mattimeo

custom 52421907092886129443custom 53482432486472720992custom 54430862068311913572custom 53462090963013107111custom 53481811391252038261custom 53482248404174415011

Signed cddx.

20 Jul 2026, 09:46 UTC131 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

#OPIUM Editor: Mattimeo

custom 53482248404174415013custom 54426594245209216323custom 53481745463504069092custom 54452051633064101322custom 52421907092886129441custom 53462090963013107111custom 53482432486472720991custom 53484992931226215641

Signed cddx.

17 Jul 2026, 20:49 UTC134 views16 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Video

#OPIUM Editor: царь дин

custom 53483701563409332543custom 54452051633064101323custom 52421907092886129442custom 53481745463504069092custom 53482248404174415012custom 53483603337507279472custom 58708288417227144062

Signed cddx.

12 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC172 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

#OPIUM Editor: Mattimeo

custom 53481811391252038264custom 53483701563409332544custom 54452051633064101324custom 53483603337507279473custom 52421907092886129442custom 58708288417227144062

Signed cddx.

6 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC237 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

#OPIUM Editor: Pedro

custom 54452051633064101322

Signed cddx.

3 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC276 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

#OPIUM Editor: lili

custom 53481811391252038262custom 53482248404174415012custom 54452051633064101322custom 58708288417227144062custom 52421907092886129441custom 53481745463504069091custom 53483603337507279471

Signed m

3 Jul 2026, 15:14 UTC196 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

#OPIUM Editor: Pedro

custom 52421907092886129442custom 53481811391252038262custom 53483701563409332542custom 54452051633064101322custom 53482248404174415011custom 53483603337507279471custom 58708288417227144061

Signed cddx.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OP1UMWSLI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OPIUM” (@OP1UMWSLI), 444 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OP1UMWSLI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.