Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 62 days, net -83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,903–6,010 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Oct 2026, 13:36
5,915
-5
20 Oct 2026, 08:46
5,920
-5
17 Oct 2026, 03:04
5,925
-1
14 Oct 2026, 10:08
5,926
-5
11 Oct 2026, 02:56
5,931
-17
4 Oct 2026, 19:36
5,948
-12
25 Sept 2026, 04:56
5,960
-9
16 Sept 2026, 19:57
5,969
-4
12 Sept 2026, 18:17
5,973
-7
9 Sept 2026, 02:38
5,980
-4
4 Sept 2026, 04:00
5,984
+2
29 Aug 2026, 11:26
5,982
-3
26 Aug 2026, 08:08
5,985
-10
23 Aug 2026, 12:04
5,995
-3
22 Aug 2026, 01:45
5,998
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
130 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
78
60.0%
🙏
34
26.2%
👍
8
6.15%
😢
3
2.31%
🥰
2
1.54%
👌
1
0.769%
👏
1
0.769%
😨
1
0.769%
🙈
1
0.769%
🥱
1
0.769%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Consider the following statements:
1. A Cabinet Minister holding an existing portfolio does not take a fresh oath of office upon assuming additional charge of another ministry.
2. The administrative rules for allocation of government business among Union Ministers are framed by the President under Article 77(3).
3. Individual ministerial resignation triggers the automatic dissolution of the entire Council of Minis…
Consider the following statements regarding the legal mechanisms of Fast-Track Courts (FTCs) in India and select the incorrect statement
#Polity @missionoas
FTCs are special temporary judicial benches formed to expedite trials for specific highpriority case33%
FTCs function on daily hearing schedules to bypass standard procedural adjournments.28%
Case disposal in FTCs requires unanimous approval from the Supreme Court before judgment delivery.16%
All are correct23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following acts or amendments completely removed the legal protection initially granted to a ‘split’ involving one-third of a political party’s legislative members under the Tenth Schedule ?
#Polity @missionoas
The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 197615%
The 52nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 198541%
The 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 200219%
The 91st Constitutional Amendment Act, 200326%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Check List for Tomorrow
1. Admit Card
2. Original ID proof
3. ID proof Xerox
4. Passport size photo (has to be affixed and signed across at the space provided on the Admit Card)
5. Blue/Black ball point pen
(Carry at least 2 no of pens)
6. Water bottle ( ଏମିତି ଯେଉଁ ପ୍ରବଳ ଖରା ଆଉ ଗୁଳୁଗୁଳି ହେଉଛି ଅଳ୍ପ ଲୁଣ ଅଥବା Glucondi ଟିକେ ପାଣିରେ ପକେଇ mix କରିଦେବା ଟା ଉଚିତ ନଚେତ Dehydration ହେଇପାରେ )
7. Some food items( for launch)
…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OPSC_OAS_OPS_ORS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Consider the following statements regarding the legal mechanisms of Fast-Track Courts (FTCs) in India and select the incorrect statement
#Polity @missionoas
FTCs are special temporary judicial benches formed to expedite trials for specific highpriority case33%
FTCs function on daily hearing schedules to bypass standard procedural adjournments.28%
Case disposal in FTCs requires unanimous approval from the Supreme Court before judgment delivery.16%
All are correct23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following acts or amendments completely removed the legal protection initially granted to a ‘split’ involving one-third of a political party’s legislative members under the Tenth Schedule ?
#Polity @missionoas
The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 197615%
The 52nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 198541%
The 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 200219%
The 91st Constitutional Amendment Act, 200326%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How is the Bhitarkanika National Park geographically distinct from the Sundarbans despite both being mangroves ?
#Odishagk @missionoas
It is dominated by Avicennia instead of Rhizophora.29%
It is a freshwater swamp, not a saltwater one.33%
It is located on the mouth of a lagoon, not a delta.35%
It is a man-made plantation, not a natural forest.3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
📖 OPSC LIBRARY 📖 @OPSCLIBRARY · 22,770 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 September 2026
Shaktiprasad Nath Official @shaktiprasadnath · 62,582 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026
GK Today PDF @GK_Today_PDF · 38,478 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
It's STUDY TIME! @ITSSTUDYTIME2021 · 48,542 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 26 August 2026
ODISHA JOB ASPIRANTS @osssc01 · 22,551 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 September 2026
SIR odia (Sujit sir) @missionoavssirodia · 60,567 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OAS Prelims Mcq” (@OPSC_OAS_OPS_ORS), 5,915 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OPSC_OAS_OPS_ORS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.