Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for سطر | SATER

Channel

سطر | SATER

@OTAKU_e

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,427subscribers

-2,011 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004333005863
TypeChannel
Username@OTAKU_e
Created23 June 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OTAKU_e

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,4277,4386,432.511 August 2026 — 7,438 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,438 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,402 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,269 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,133 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,795 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,488 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,338 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,182 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,848 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,644 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,427 subscribers11 August 202615 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 35 days, net -2,011. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,125–7,740 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 23:015,427-217
12 Sept 2026, 04:595,644-204
8 Sept 2026, 07:555,848-334
3 Sept 2026, 00:066,182-156
31 Aug 2026, 05:456,338-150
28 Aug 2026, 15:356,488-307
25 Aug 2026, 09:056,795-338
22 Aug 2026, 00:587,133-136
19 Aug 2026, 00:367,269-133
15 Aug 2026, 16:187,402-36
12 Aug 2026, 07:477,438no change
11 Aug 2026, 17:177,438first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.12%
avg views ÷ 5,427 subscribers
Avg views / post
115
1 post measured
Reaction rate
11.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held23 (23 June 202619 August 2026)
Views total115
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,419 reactions across 22 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1,11078.2%
❤‍🔥876.13%
🍓553.88%
🌚342.40%
😁302.11%
🆒251.76%
💯221.55%
💔211.48%
💘191.34%
110.775%
🔥50.352%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,419 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 22 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OTAKU_e. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC115 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

ويا سلام لما يكون عندك فوبيا منهم 😂😂🖤 🔔 فعل زر الغاء الكتم لكي يصلك كل جديد ومميز. شكرًا لدعمكم!" #ميمز إمبراطورية الأنمي ← 𓊆 @OTAKU_e 𓊇

🤣6🌚2🍓2😁2🆒1

Signed || 𝚂𝚘𝚞𝚕 𝚁𝚎𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 ✹⃝⁦⎚

14 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC456 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

فرصة من السماء 😂😂 🔔 فعل زر الغاء الكتم لكي يصلك كل جديد ومميز. شكرًا لدعمكم!" #ميمز إمبراطورية الأنمي ← 𓊆 @OTAKU_e 𓊇

🤣9😁5🌚1🍓1💯1🆒1

Signed || 𝚂𝚘𝚞𝚕 𝚁𝚎𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 ✹⃝⁦⎚

12 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC493 views20 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

الأن أنا واثق إن الـ 8 مليار كلهم مجانين هكذا 😂 🔔 فعل زر الغاء الكتم لكي يصلك كل جديد ومميز. شكرًا لدعمكم!" #ميمز إمبراطورية الأنمي ← 𓊆 @OTAKU_e 𓊇

🤣13🌚3🆒3🍓1

Signed || 𝚂𝚘𝚞𝚕 𝚁𝚎𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 ✹⃝⁦⎚

10 Aug 2026, 20:28 UTC577 views17 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

تقريباً ذوول مقاومين للحرارة 😂😂 🔔 فعل زر الغاء الكتم لكي يصلك كل جديد ومميز. شكرًا لدعمكم!" #ميمز إمبراطورية الأنمي ← 𓊆 @OTAKU_e 𓊇

🤣12❤‍🔥2🌚1💘1🆒1

Signed || 𝚂𝚘𝚞𝚕 𝚁𝚎𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 ✹⃝⁦⎚

7 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC720 views17 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

وهنا سيدرك حمدان أنه جاب العيد ⚔️💔 🔔 فعل زر الغاء الكتم لكي يصلك كل جديد ومميز. شكرًا لدعمكم!" #ميمز إمبراطورية الأنمي ← 𓊆 @OTAKU_e 𓊇

🤣10💘3😁2🌚1🆒1

Signed || 𝚂𝚘𝚞𝚕 𝚁𝚎𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 ✹⃝⁦⎚

5 Aug 2026, 00:39 UTC781 views20 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

متابعين الأنمي لا يعرفون المستحيل 😂😂 🔔 فعل زر الغاء الكتم لكي يصلك كل جديد ومميز. شكرًا لدعمكم!" #ميمز إمبراطورية الأنمي ← 𓊆 @OTAKU_e 𓊇

🤣15🌚2❤‍🔥1💯1😁1

Signed 𝚂𝚘𝚞𝚕 𝚁𝚎𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 ✹⃝⁦🏴‍☠️

2 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC804 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

الثقة اللي عندي أنا وصاحبي في الإجابات 😂😂🔥 🔔 فعل زر الغاء الكتم لكي يصلك كل جديد ومميز. شكرًا لدعمكم!" #ميمز إمبراطورية الأنمي ← 𓊆 @OTAKU_e 𓊇

🤣12🌚2😁21💯1🆒1

Signed 𝚂𝚘𝚞𝚕 𝚁𝚎𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 ✹⃝⁦🏴‍☠️

23 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,410 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

حتى الكلاب فرق مقامات 😂😂 🔔 فعل زر الغاء الكتم لكي يصلك كل جديد ومميز. شكرًا لدعمكم!" #ميمز إمبراطورية الأنمي ← 𓊆 @OTAKU_e 𓊇

🤣13🍓4😁2💔1💯1🆒1

Signed 𝚂𝚘𝚞𝚕 𝚁𝚎𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 ✹⃝⁦🏴‍☠️

21 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC≈1,050 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🤣14🍓3😁2

Signed 𝚂𝚘𝚞𝚕 𝚁𝚎𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 𝟶𝟿:𝟷𝟹

20 Jul 2026, 22:23 UTC≈1,150 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🌌 عاجل ▫ تسريب فيلم بليتش الجديد على الإنترنت والذي يجمع الثلاث حلقات الأولي 🔥❤️‍🔥 🔔 فعل زر الغاء الكتم لكي يصلك كل جديد ومميز. شكرًا لدعمكم!" #اخبار إمبراطورية الأنمي ← 𓊆 @OTAKU_e 𓊇

🍓10❤‍🔥5💯4💘1🔥1🆒1

Signed 𝚂𝚘𝚞𝚕 𝚁𝚎𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 𝟶𝟷:𝟸𝟹

19 Jul 2026, 19:40 UTC918 views42 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

سيندريلا فرع أتاك 😂😂 🔔 فعل زر الغاء الكتم لكي يصلك كل جديد ومميز. شكرًا لدعمكم!" #ميمز إمبراطورية الأنمي ← 𓊆 @OTAKU_e 𓊇

🤣236😁6🌚5🍓2

Signed 𝚂𝚘𝚞𝚕 𝚁𝚎𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 𝟷𝟶:𝟺𝟶

16 Jul 2026, 22:32 UTC≈1,010 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

لما تكون الفكرة شيطانية وتجيلك أنت وهو في نفس الوقت 😂😂 🔔 فعل زر الغاء الكتم لكي يصلك كل جديد ومميز. شكرًا لدعمكم!" #ميمز إمبراطورية الأنمي ← 𓊆 @OTAKU_e 𓊇

🤣13🍓4🌚2💯2

Signed 𝚂𝚘𝚞𝚕 𝚁𝚎𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 𝟶𝟷:𝟹𝟸

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @OTAKU_e. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سطر | SATER” (@OTAKU_e), 5,427 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OTAKU_e.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.