Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Острый Угол

Channel

Острый Угол

@OUgol

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,137subscribers

+91 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001294855730
TypeChannel
Username@OUgol
Created7 June 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OUgol

Growth

13,02513,14013,082.56 August 2026 — 13,046 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,046 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,048 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,041 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,038 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,034 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,031 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,028 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,025 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,029 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,044 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,049 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,053 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,059 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,066 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,068 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,074 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,071 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,073 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,071 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,104 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,124 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,133 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,140 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,139 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,137 subscribers13,1376 August 20265 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 30 days, net +91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,008–13,157 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 04:3913,137-2
3 Sept 2026, 10:4613,139-1
1 Sept 2026, 04:0713,140+7
31 Aug 2026, 00:2813,133+9
30 Aug 2026, 02:5513,124+20
29 Aug 2026, 01:3413,104+33
27 Aug 2026, 22:0413,071-2
26 Aug 2026, 23:3813,073+2
25 Aug 2026, 20:3813,071-3
24 Aug 2026, 18:4813,074+6
23 Aug 2026, 04:1513,068+2
21 Aug 2026, 13:2913,066+7
20 Aug 2026, 11:4813,059+6
19 Aug 2026, 10:1513,053+4
18 Aug 2026, 09:2213,049+5
17 Aug 2026, 10:5513,044+15
15 Aug 2026, 20:2813,029+4
14 Aug 2026, 08:4713,025-3
12 Aug 2026, 02:4613,028-3
11 Aug 2026, 03:3613,031first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.4%
avg views ÷ 13,137 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,170
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held43 (15 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total118,990
Reactions total2,429
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26m 41s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,726 reactions across 43 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯91119.3%
👍74015.7%
🔥63113.4%
🤣53211.3%
😁3667.74%
3557.51%
🤬3146.64%
👏952.01%
🤔801.69%
🤡741.57%
💊721.52%
😡691.46%
😱621.31%
💩501.06%
450.952%
😭400.846%
❤‍🔥360.762%
🕊320.677%
😢320.677%
👎290.614%
28 further kinds1613.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,726 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 43 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OUgol. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 14:50 UTC≈2,010 views74 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Трабер и его "деловой партнер" Владимир Даниленко вышли на свободу, уголовное дело в отношении них прекращено. Вот так легко. Всё для того, чтоб народ не думал, что "Трабер главнее Путина", и все понимали, кто тут папа. По щелчку пальцев посажу, по щелчку пальцев уголовное дело. По щелчку пальцев выпускаю и уголовное дело прекращаю. Чтобы без иллюзий лишний раз. Трабер мстительный, не забудет. Хотя вон Могилевич то

💯48👍15🤣6😈31😡1

31 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC≈2,540 views64 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

Впервые за некоторое время посмотрел политическую разговорную передачу. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kryu4emi3Mw Авторы прямо не называют, но по сути дебаты между Навальной и Ходорковским. Юлия Навальная молодец. Выходила замуж за обычного юриста, а сейчас вынуждена продолжать дело оппозиционного политика номер 1 в России и держать планку. Видно, что набирается опыта. Следующий шаг — хотя бы еженедельные эфиры по

🤡29🔥15👍6👎4🤣3🤮3🥴21

31 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC≈2,930 views61 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

И еще немного из Швейка. В России не повторять!

🤣41💯12🔥6🥴1😁1

30 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC≈3,440 views96 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Вернулся из будущего, привез документальные кадры мобилизации-2026

🔥44😁38💊5💩511🥱1😢1

29 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC≈3,660 views116 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

К Явлинскому всегда много вопросов, но нельзя не отметить последовательность его заявлений. Кто-то называет Жириновского пророком (конечно, когда ты делаешь 100 глупых заявлений и 3 из них сбываются — это явно пророчество, а не математика). Реальный анализ, исходя из известных тебе данных, конечно же, тема гораздо более серьезная, и Явлинский не последний тут.

👍82💯27💩4🤣3

25 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC≈5,390 views63 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Спросили людей на улицах Перми, что они думают о возможной мобилизации в следующем месяце. Один из респондентов (бывший участник СВО) утверждает, что он знает, что мобилизация будет и будет скорее, чем люди думают. Параллельно в Москву с полусекретным визитом прилетает директор ЦРУ (и тут же улетает). Передавал послание Путину. Настолько серьёзное, что пришлось лично лететь. По слухам, вопрос стоял о мобилизации и

🤔34🤣11🤬7💊6🍌2😁2👎1

24 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC≈4,900 views83 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

Шестая глава "Утилизации" уже в работе. Будет жёстко, много фактуры, несколько версий (чтоб обойти цензуру), поэтому как всегда медленно. А пока кадр, который хорошо характеризует общую атмосферу.

🔥4515👍12😱6💊3🤯1🆒1

23 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC≈5,680 views76 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Сегодня 3 года со дня гибели Евгения Пригожина. Путин не простил мятеж и подорвал своего бывшего повара, позже обвинив его в том, что тот нанюхался кокса и решил сам себя подорвать гранатой. Хороший повод вспомнить похождения "самого буйного клоуна в тувинском цирке" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GmuMCtpRmc

👍55🕊114👎2🤣2💩1😢1

21 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC≈5,760 views139 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Ельцин до и после развала СССР. И с путинизмом будет аналогично.

😁76💯23💩98🤮86🤡4🤔2

21 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC≈4,780 views89 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @istories_mediaPhoto

Российские войска дважды ударили по крупнейшему ТЦ в Кривом Роге. Минимум пять человек погибли, 52 человека ранены Российские реактивные дроны ударили по торговому центру в Кривом Роге. Судя по опубликованным кадрам, речь идет о ТЦ «Солнечная галерея». После прибытия на место спасателей последовал повторный удар. Пять человек погибли, сообщил глава Днепропетровской областной военной администрации Александр Ганжа. Е

🤬55😭29😢21🤣1🙈1

21 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC≈4,870 views133 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @agentstvonewsPhoto

Власти снимают с выборов одного из главных критиков «Единой России» Силовики в Саратове задержали кандидата в депутаты Госдумы от КПРФ Николая Бондаренко. Как сообщил сам политик, ему вменили публичную демонстрацию экстремистской символики. Привлечение к ответственности по такой статье приведет к запрету участвовать в выборах. Снятие Бондаренко может означать, что с этих выборов снимают не только противников войны,

🤬98🤣8🤷‍♂6😢65💊3🤡3🤔2

17 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈5,830 views119 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

Верховный суд окончательно отказал "Яблоку" в участии в выборах. Оно было и ожидаемо, потому что желание о недопуске высказал лично Путин, и было бы странно, если б их допустили, и народ стал бы законно высказывать свою позицию о мире (что бесит В.В., потому что он боится отсутствия поддержки своего антиукраинского курса — глас народа должен быть един) Изначально Яблоко вообще внесли в списки, я считаю, с санкции А

😡65💯269👍9🤣3💩2🤮2🗿1

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @OUgol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Острый Угол” (@OUgol), 13,137 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OUgol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.