Channel
@OX_PARTY
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
957subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002129582443 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OX_PARTY |
| Created | 20 January 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OX_PARTY |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:42 | 957 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 956 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 961 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 959 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
165 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 41 | 24.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 35 | 21.2% | |
| ❤ | 30 | 18.2% | |
| 🥰 | 22 | 13.3% | |
| 🍓 | 12 | 7.27% | |
| 🌭 | 9 | 5.45% | |
| 💋 | 7 | 4.24% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 2.42% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 1.21% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.21% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.606% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Почетный гость, нашего кафе~ 🤍🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🤍 СПЕЦИАЛЬНЫЙ ГОСТЬ 🤍 O.X. PARTY/ О.Х. ПАТИ ХЕЙ-ХЕЙ-ХЕЙ! O.X. PARTY снова на вечеринке у YNNent.? — Yes, master! 🎀 29 августа нас ждёт ночь в эстетике maid: кружево, бантики, фартуки, горничные, неон, танцы и тот самый вайб откровений после полуночи) YNNent. зовут нас в гости как спецгостей, а мы, по традиции, придём не с пустыми руками 👀 Гот…
❤6💋5👍3🔥2🍓1
🤩🤩 А вот и видео-репортаж с нашей вечеринки 2000х Прекрасный видеограф, создавший этот шедевр: @nahodka_adnegel О.Х.PARTY ВЕЧЕРИНКА 2000х
🔥14❤🔥9🥰6🍓2💋2💯2🌚1🌭1
Прекрасные фотографии от Ардарии готовы!!!🔥 Бегом смотреть)
❤6
Я попала в прошлое и в свое детство! В нулевых годах, когда небо было безоблачным, а деревья были выше, когда "большой стаканчик по 5, маленький по 3" было нормально высыпать в карман и идти дальше слушая на своей раскладушке музыку, которую записал на диктофон пока шел твой любимый клим на МTV. Это было время свободы и субкультуры, время леопарда и супер заниженных джинс. Все это я почувствовала на вечеринке от O.X.…
❤🔥11
НУ ВАУ, СОГЛАСНЫ? 💅🏻🔥 (восторг профессионализму Пралены можно нужно выразить в комментариях)
🔥9🥰6❤3❤🔥1🍓1
Фоточки с O.X. готовы 🥺 Доступны они по этой ссылке ✨ При публикации прошу отмечать меня, как автора фотографий ✨ Категорически запрещено кадрирование фотографий (изменение размера) Буду благодарна реактам и комментам 🐇
❤🔥11🔥6❤5🥰1
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Для тех, кому не хватило нашей тусовки 2000х и нужно больше веселья - сильно советуем заглянуть к нашим друзьям: клубу FIREBALL Уже в эту субботу с их сцены будут звучать легендарные песни русского рока! Самое время погрузиться в атмосферу живых концертов группы КИНО начала 90-х годов вместе с командой КиноХит ! Это действительно то, что нельзя пропускать! Обязательно присоединяйся к нам: 🎙️23.05/ сбор гос…
❤🔥3🌭3🔥2❤1🥰1
Привет привет наши хорошие , на связи Котов Как вы после вечеринки?) Надеюсь остались только самые лучшие воспоминания Как по мне отдохнули мы знатно ))) И музыка , и движ, и приятные люди вокруг, что может быть лучше ? Кстати о важных птичках , уже лично от меня от Котова Благодаря вам Я возвращаю старого себя , того самого Котова с фоторужьем ))) Всегда буду рад вас принять с вашими творческими идеями ещё и у себя)…
🍓4🔥4❤3🌭2💩2👍1🥰1
Ловите записи с моментального дефиле! И еще Дамы и господа, кто помнит что их снимал видеограф и хочет получить оригинальные кадры себе в копилку, смело пишите Анастасии. Вот её личка: @White_moray Тгк: https://t.me/nahodka_adnegel
❤3🔥3🥰3🌭2🍓1
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Номер выступающих с 26 по 30 Ссылка на дефиле: https://disk.yandex.ru/d/OrGnKww1xlx7mw Видеограф: @nahodka_adnegel О.Х.PARTY ВЕЧЕРИНКА 2000х
🥰4❤3🍓3🌭1🔥1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @OX_PARTY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 164,971 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@OX_PARTY named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“O.X. •|17.05|•ВЕЧЕРИНКА 00х•|18+” (@OX_PARTY), 957 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OX_PARTY.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.