Channel
@Oberadjutant
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
40subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002396811931 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Oberadjutant |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Oberadjutant |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:28 | 40 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 38 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 37 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 37 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
64 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 23.4% | |
| 🐳 | 15 | 23.4% | |
| 🍾 | 11 | 17.2% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 17.2% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 7.81% | |
| 😈 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 3.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
- Не могу говорить, но так уж и быть, вот вам контекст. 🙄 - Так ты же сам позвонил… Мистеры «Такова моя природа» и Божий одуванчик, который может и по голове саблей дать. Я не в состоянии передать все перипетии игрового лора, тем более что это, скорее, перенос лорных концептов на исторические реалии (к чему сюжет игры очень располагает), но было интересно выписать часть идей из своей головы. Единственное, что стоит…
🔥4🍾3🍓2🐳2
В честь того, что коммьюнити Reverse: 1999 теперь представляет, как могут выглядеть персонажи со сдвоенными аффлатусами, - долгожданный инсерт, на который я копил ульту почти год. Накопил недостаточно, потому что без версий до возвышения, но тут ещё фантазировать и фантазировать. 🤩 Контекст есть только у одного человека с голосовыми сообщениями суммарно на час, но игру я всем искренне советую. #kavalergard_croquis …
🔥4🐳3😈3❤1
Ну вы сами знаете, что есть лучший подарок для рисующего человека в день рождения. Особенно в Телеге, где вообще не понятно, как распространять своё творчество. Кто узнал большинство старых полноценок - поздравляю, вы явно ветеран кампании 1809 года. 🥂 #kavalergard_birthday
🐳7🍾5🥰3🫡2❤1
В последний день радужного месяца контент может быть только такой. 🦄 Хотелось бы нарисовать что-то специально, но, видимо, это будет либо чуть позже, либо уже никогда. Искренне завидую всем, у кого на руках есть реально квирные историчности, чью память они всячески отстаивают. I only have two white straight men with children on my hands, and I do sooo many things to them, а, главное, с каким удовольствием. 💅 #kaval…
❤9🐳2🥰2🍾1
- Sie lesen eine Zeitschrift und stoßen auf ein ganzseitiges Aktfoto eines jungen Mannes… - Wollen Sie damit testen, ob ich ein Replikant oder homosexuell bin, Herr Vernehmer? - Beantworten Sie bitte einfach die Fragen. - Sie zeigen dieses Foto Ihrer Frau, und es gefällt ihr so gut, dass sie es an die Wand Ihres Schlafzimmers hängt. - Das würde ich nicht erlauben. - Warum nicht? - Ich allein sollte ihr doch reichen. …
❤4🔥3🍾2🐳1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @Oberadjutant. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Его Благородие и пыльный шкаф” (@Oberadjutant), 40 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Oberadjutant.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.