Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for obsidia

Channel

obsidia

@ObsidianMermaid

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

367subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003970434103
TypeChannel
Username@ObsidianMermaid
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 5 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ObsidianMermaid

Growth

3674153917 August 2026 — 372 subscribers8 August 2026 — 372 subscribers8 August 2026 — 408 subscribers17 August 2026 — 415 subscribers25 August 2026 — 392 subscribers31 August 2026 — 385 subscribers10 September 2026 — 384 subscribers18 September 2026 — 367 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 41 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 360–422 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 05:58367-17
10 Sept 2026, 18:37384-1
31 Aug 2026, 16:34385-7
25 Aug 2026, 03:03392-23
17 Aug 2026, 09:43415+7
8 Aug 2026, 19:46408+36
8 Aug 2026, 06:19372no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:26372first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52512316326265685381727.0%
custom 58728782068428387371320.6%
custom 59766224890426893561117.5%
custom 5050921560601265461914.3%
custom 530304531063168019869.52%
custom 580109978997412018057.94%
custom 519088750103157624023.17%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC72 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @oldmoneysvibe

And Even if we never speak again, I will always protect what we shared.

custom 59766224890426893565custom 50509215606012654612custom 58728782068428387372custom 52512316326265685381

7 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC722 viewsread 8 August 2026

🤍 #fwd this msg and choose a number between 1-30 and I’ll tell you : what your past life was like, how you fell in love and how you died lol Join in my mermaid house xoxo 🤩 numbers u can choose 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

7 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC172 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

jazmin ( disney princess )

custom 58728782068428387374

7 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC170 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @HidenChat_bot

You give off major Blue Lagoon movie vibes:)

custom 59766224890426893564custom 58728782068428387373custom 50509215606012654611

7 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC164 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 50509215606012654615custom 58728782068428387374custom 52512316326265685383custom 59766224890426893562

5 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC134 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 53030453106316801985custom 52512316326265685383custom 50509215606012654611custom 58010997899741201801

Signed kiyana ( siren coded )

5 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC141 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52512316326265685383custom 58010997899741201803custom 51908875010315762401

5 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC181 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I support the girls whose doing a hard thing just to make their life special kiss from here to all of u and try hard 🐣

custom 52512316326265685387custom 51908875010315762401custom 53030453106316801981custom 58010997899741201801

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ObsidianMermaid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“obsidia” (@ObsidianMermaid), 367 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ObsidianMermaid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.