Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Eaconomy Signals Free signals ®📈📈📉📉

Channel

Eaconomy Signals Free signals ®📈📈📉📉

@OfficalFx_1

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

42,730subscribers

+30,375 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002066179390
TypeChannel
Username@OfficalFx_1
DescriptionArtificial Intelligence is disrupting the trading industry. You can leverage this dynamic A.I. software by choosing the trading pair of your choice, technical analysis pattern , and timeframe. Then allow Manara™ to do what it does best and scan the market
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OfficalFx_1

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

9.3 average views per post against 42,730 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.022%. Across the 3,666 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,636–99,982 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 1.75% and 11.1%, with a median of 5.05%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (10 August 2026 9 September 2026)
Posts measured408 of 408 published in the window (408 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled3,791
Mature posts only0.031% over 43 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers42,730 measured 9 September 2026
Cohortb31623:eng · 3,666 channels · p10 0.437% · p25 1.75% · p50 5.05% · p75 11.1% · p90 21.6%
Position in cohort0.709th percentile · 1/250 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.068% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 9 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

10,47242,73026,6017 August 2026 — 12,355 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,355 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,333 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,982 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,871 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,761 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,657 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,545 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,427 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,294 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,107 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,022 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,972 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,907 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,872 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,779 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,548 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,472 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,270 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,553 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,478 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,369 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,274 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,424 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,352 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,028 subscribers4 September 2026 — 22,954 subscribers6 September 2026 — 22,786 subscribers9 September 2026 — 42,730 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 33 days, net +30,375. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,633–47,569 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 17:4042,730+19,944
6 Sept 2026, 09:5622,786-168
4 Sept 2026, 01:0022,954-74
2 Sept 2026, 17:5523,028+2,676
1 Sept 2026, 13:5220,352-72
31 Aug 2026, 10:2520,424+150
30 Aug 2026, 10:5820,274-95
29 Aug 2026, 09:3620,369-109
28 Aug 2026, 12:3220,478-75
27 Aug 2026, 13:2820,553+5,283
26 Aug 2026, 14:5615,270+4,798
25 Aug 2026, 14:0210,472-76
24 Aug 2026, 11:3910,548-231
22 Aug 2026, 22:2410,779-93
21 Aug 2026, 08:3810,872-35
20 Aug 2026, 12:0210,907-65
19 Aug 2026, 11:3610,972-50
18 Aug 2026, 13:4211,022-85
17 Aug 2026, 10:4211,107-187
15 Aug 2026, 18:2811,294first reading

Engagement

431 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.022%
avg views ÷ 42,730 subscribers
Avg views / post
9.3
408 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
408
of 431 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 408 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held431 (7 August 20269 September 2026)
Views total3,791
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 17:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
19,600
Videos
838
Links
847

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 431 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 431 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2026, 15:25 UTC4 viewsread 9 September 2026
Photo

EURGBP BUY NOW STOPLOSS @ 0.85615 TP @ 0.85800 TP @ 0.85880 TP @ 0.85980

9 Sept 2026, 15:25 UTC4 viewsread 9 September 2026
Photo

BTCUSD SELL NOW AGAIN STOPLOSS @ 80,350 TP @ 78,600 TP @ 77,950 TP @ 77,100

9 Sept 2026, 15:25 UTC4 viewsread 9 September 2026
Photo

NZDJPY BUY NOW STOPLOSS @ 88.850 TP @ 90.500 TP @ 91.250 TP @ 92.000

9 Sept 2026, 15:25 UTC4 viewsread 9 September 2026
Photo

AUDUSD SELL NOW STOPLOSS @ 0.72525 TP @ 0.72225 TP @ 0.72120 TP @ 0.71980

9 Sept 2026, 15:25 UTC4 viewsread 9 September 2026
Photo

AUDUSD SELL NOW STOPLOSS @ 1.72470 TP @ 1.72200 TP @ 1.72100 TP @ 1.71980

9 Sept 2026, 15:24 UTC3 viewsread 9 September 2026
Photo

XAUUSD 🔤🔤 0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ GOLD RUNNING 110 + PIPS ▶️💵 TP. 1 HIT ENJOY PROFIT💵 WOHOOO 🎉Good start for today🔥🔥🔥 Secure some and breakeven to trade risk free 💯

9 Sept 2026, 15:24 UTC3 viewsread 9 September 2026
Photo

XAUUSD 🔤🔤 0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ GOLD RUNNING 150 + PIPS ▶️💵 TP. 2 HIT ENJOY PROFIT💵 WOHOOO 🎉Good start for today🔥🔥🔥 Secure some and breakeven to trade risk free 💯

9 Sept 2026, 15:24 UTC5 viewsread 9 September 2026
Photo

XAUUSD 🔤🔤 0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ GOLD RUNNING 350 + PIPS ▶️💵 TP. 3 HIT ENJOY PROFIT💵 WOHOOO 🎉Good start for today🔥🔥🔥 Secure some and breakeven to trade risk free 💯

9 Sept 2026, 15:23 UTC3 viewsread 9 September 2026

XAUUSD BUY 4392/4389 TP 4395 TP 4398 TP 4401 TP 4404 TP 4407 TP 4410 SL 4379

Showing the 12 most recent of 431 posts we hold for @OfficalFx_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTCAnonymous Poll0 voters

Should I open 5 VIP Lifetime Spots for $220 only?

  1. Yes0%
  2. Definitely0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 431 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

VOLATILITY INDICES STEP INDEX SIGNALS
@Volatility_Indices_Index_Signals · 260,394
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Eaconomy Signals Free signals ®📈📈📉📉” (@OfficalFx_1), 42,730 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OfficalFx_1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.