Channel
@OldNewsPit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
754subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003837164068 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OldNewsPit |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 27 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OldNewsPit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 754 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 756 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 762 | +9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 753 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 752 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 752 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
310 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 95 | 30.6% | |
| 😁 | 52 | 16.8% | |
| 👍 | 40 | 12.9% | |
| 🤬 | 40 | 12.9% | |
| 🤮 | 17 | 5.48% | |
| 🌚 | 14 | 4.52% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 4.19% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 2.58% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 2.26% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 1.61% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 1.61% | |
| 🤨 | 4 | 1.29% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 0.645% | |
| 🎃 | 1 | 0.323% | |
| 🎅 | 1 | 0.323% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.323% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.323% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.323% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.323% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.323% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.323% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 310 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
American foreign funding will shift to route directly through national governments rather than third-party non-governmental organizations (NGOs) : - U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio US senate says FCRA will affect IND - US ties - Link Kejriwal's NGO "Parirvartan" banned in 2015 - 2015
😁4🌚3🤨1
2013: Economist Dr. Manmohan Singh projected India would have to import $300 billion in electronics goods by 2020. Now we are in 2026, and electronics imports are barely $100 billion even India has become one of the top exporter of Iphones. Last year only India was able to manufacture 27 nm (Semiconductor Chips large scale usable chips in various gazettes). Read more about semiconductor journey of India from 1960 …
🤣14🤨2🎃1👍1
Netaji Mulayam's handshake with Atique Ahmed's dog. 😂 Link
🤣16😁2🐳1👨💻1🤩1
Cockroach Janta Party spokes on removal of 370. 04 August 2019
🤮12🤬8
Lashkar-E-Taiba's First Ever Explosive Admission 🔥🔥🔥 Lashkar-e-Taiba/JKUM terrorist Rizwan Hanif openly admits that more than 30 members of the outfit were eliminated by unknown gunmen (Indian agents), across Peshawar, Karachi, Rawalpindi, Rawalakot and Muzaffarabad over the last 3 to 4 years. In the same speech, he used hateful language against another religion, calling them "cow worshippers." This shows how terro…
👍5🔥5🗿1😁1
Saar 2013
😁8🌚6🤣5🤡1🤨1
Video depicts several police personnels kIA during today's sucid@l attack, Swat Pakistan. In July month total 201 &nd forces including some Police personnels has been 72ed by common public and freedom fighters across various regions.
👍8😁7
Rajiv Gandhi failed in Cambridge where it is impossible to fail : Congress Leader MS Aiyar
🤣29
Economics 2008 Chenab Bridge.
😁8❤6🤣5🌚1
Some people were threatening Pappu Yadav in the name of Lawrence Bishnoi. One person threatened him by using his sister (साली ) in laws mobile. Police revealed contradictory to Pappu Yadav's claims. News link Video link
😁9🤣5💩2🌚1
Fake News paddler Dhruv Rathi tried to save image of Arvind Kejriwal and posted a new video and said there is no paper leak in Punjab Here both Kejriwal and and Bhagwant Mann accepting the same. Video link - 2023 Remember AAP, Kejriwal and Dhruv all supported CJP led rioters in Delhi.
😁7👍4❤1👌1🤬1
White washing of Former Counsellor AAP, Tahir Hussain by SM influencers in 2020.
🤬5👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @OldNewsPit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dhurandhar Old News” (@OldNewsPit), 754 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OldNewsPit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.