Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Олег Ганн. Блог 🏫

Channel

Олег Ганн. Блог 🏫

@Oleg_Gann

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,398subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001426761807
TypeChannel
Username@Oleg_Gann
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Oleg_Gann

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3921,4061,3996 August 2026 — 1,406 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,406 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,405 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,404 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,401 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,400 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,398 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,395 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,394 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,392 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,396 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,398 subscribers1,3986 August 202616 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 41 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,390–1,408 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 23:211,398+2
13 Sept 2026, 02:371,396+4
8 Sept 2026, 22:201,392-2
3 Sept 2026, 07:481,394-1
30 Aug 2026, 16:141,395-3
27 Aug 2026, 10:061,398-2
24 Aug 2026, 13:381,400-1
20 Aug 2026, 15:361,401-3
17 Aug 2026, 11:271,404-1
10 Aug 2026, 10:181,405-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:011,406no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:561,406first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1925.7%
👍1824.3%
💩1723.0%
1216.2%
🔥79.46%
👏11.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Oleg_Gann. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC113 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Простое решение от спама и мошенников в соцсетях. Предложил в поддержку Макса. Телега, думаю, по идеологическим соображениям никогда такое не введёт: Предложение сделать дополнительную верификацию. Верификацию проводить только вживую с паспортом в МФЦ или отделениях Сбербанка/ВТБ. Сделать 4 уровня пользователей: 0 уровень. Без верификации. Ограничен в правах и если пишет другому человеку, то обязательно уведомлять,

💩9

2 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC300 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Немного юмора от ИИшницы. Оказывается, Сбер нефть и газ добывает. Интересно как? Ваши варианты в комментах ⬇️

30 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC392 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

"Весь мир - театр жопа. А люди в нем - актеры какашки" (с) У. Шекспир Олег Ганн ...и тех и тех в конце тоннеля ждёт свет. Настроение в четверг. У вас как дела?

😁6💩5

23 Jul 2026, 07:57 UTC518 viewsread 6 August 2026

В Москве уже на заправках всё в порядке. У вас как? И стоило оно того? Паниковать на пустом месте

23 Jul 2026, 07:57 UTC531 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @auantonov

Кстати, почему никто не говорит о том, что в России заканчивается этот смертельный и бесповоротный топливный кризис? Где сообщения об этом в каналах, которые громче всех тогда возмущались? Где видео от так называемых лидеров мнений, которые один раз не смогли заправиться и из этого делали вывод, что всё, кончилась Россия? Или у них уже какая-то новая тема для грусти? А почему они всё время только о грустном говоря

😁13🔥6💩3

22 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC516 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://vkvideo.ru/live-201991021_456241466?uh=5e96ab1b75f3b7 Обзор рынка сегоДНА. 22 июля, в 19:15

8

21 Jul 2026, 07:07 UTC493 viewsread 6 August 2026

ИИкономика по факту оказывается не экономной вовсе. Второй раз встречается ситуация - проект тесно завязан на ИИшницах, куча агентов, действительно полезных решений. Я такой - ВАУ! Молодцы! А потом начинаешь считать ИИкономику и становится грустно: Первый пример: экосистема из ИИшниц-агентов, которые помогают более глубоко делать анализ рынка, могут анализировать твою торговую систему. Даже код для бота по трейдин

16 Jul 2026, 17:33 UTC508 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Этим постом хочу напомнить что половина лета уже ту-ту. Пупупу *присылайте свои фотки лета

👍2

16 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTC501 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Понимаю, рынок сейчас тяжелый и 1$ - это уже серьезная сумма. Так что надо постараться. Ответы в комментариях 👇

15 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC396 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://www.rbc.ru/finances/15/07/2026/6a5732609a7947c8b46a01bb

14 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC432 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Один из трудных для меня сейчас вопросов - это "Как дела?" Потому что то, что хорошо сейчас не обязательно так и останется навсегда или даже может быть моментом перед очередным звиздецом. Вспомните - когда прям хорошо шло всё в торговле, хочется со всеми поделиться радостью - что потом наступает? И даже плохие ситуации по жизни потом, со временем, оказываются важными событиями, которые (если правильно их решить) -

👍9

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Oleg_Gann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Олег Ганн. Блог 🏫” (@Oleg_Gann), 1,398 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Oleg_Gann.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.